界面已本地化;技能介绍与说明文档按所选语言由 AI 自动翻译,代码、命令、路径和专业术语保留原文,以原作者文档为准。
探索技能
开发与工程 · SKILL.md

session-flow

session-flow

【开发与工程】Reorient in the current Claude Code session with an evidence-backed map of its goal, pivots, outcomes, current step, and open decisions.

独立 GitHub 快照 · 自动分类 · 以原作者文档为准

技能说明

GitHub

name: session-flow description: Reorient in the current Claude Code session with an evidence-backed map of its goal, pivots, outcomes, current step, and open decisions. argument-hint: "[short|reset]" disable-model-invocation: true

Session Flow

Build a compact, evidence-backed map of how this conversation actually unfolded so the user can reorient after switching sessions or compacting. This is an advisory summary, not a planner, executor, or replacement for the user's task list.

Modes

  • No argument: render the full map and reconcile its session-flow Tasks when native Task tools are available.
  • short: return only the goal, current stage, and what (if anything) needs the user. Read-only; do not change Tasks.
  • reset: discover and delete only Tasks owned by this skill, then confirm what was removed. Do not render a new map.

Workflow

  1. Reconstruct the flow from this conversation's user messages and tool results. Do not treat repository state alone as evidence that a stage happened. Separate the original goal from explicit goal changes, pivots, completed outcomes, dropped paths, and decisions still waiting on the user.
  2. Make 4–8 meaningful stages when the history supports them; use fewer rather than padding sparse histories or inventing work. Use one outcome per stage:
    • ✅ completed with an outcome supported by the conversation
    • ▶ the current unfinished stage
    • ○ an explicitly planned but unstarted stage
    • ✂ dropped, with the stated reason
    • ↪ a pivot, with the old direction and the evidenced new direction
  3. Give every stage one compact evidence pointer. Use a real URL or artifact path when one appears in the conversation; otherwise cite a distinctive short user quote or tool result. Never invent a link or state an inference as fact. Mark uncertain or pre-compaction reconstruction as inferred.
  4. Keep the full map to at most 15 lines: one line per stage, plus concise goal, Needs you, and Next lines. Include open decisions in Needs you; say none when there are none. Next must be a concrete next action only when the conversation supports one.
  5. In the default and reset modes, call TaskList and inspect every [S<number>] candidate with TaskGet before mutating it. A Task belongs to this skill only when its subject starts with [S<number>] and its description contains the exact marker line session-flow: managed stage. Never edit, complete, delete, or reuse an unmarked Task.
  6. In the default mode, update owned Tasks that still represent a stage, create missing stages with TaskCreate, a subject beginning [S<number>], and a description whose first line is the ownership marker followed by stage evidence. Match statuses to the map: completed (including dropped or pivoted) is completed, current is in_progress, and planned is pending. Delete owned Tasks for stages no longer in the reconstructed map with TaskUpdate status deleted; keep surviving stage numbers stable and avoid collisions with unowned Tasks.
  7. The OMC continuation hook excludes Tasks with both the [S<number>] subject prefix and the exact ownership marker, so these descriptive records are not treated as unfinished work. Preserve both markers on every create or update. short must not call mutating Task tools.
  8. For reset, discover owned Tasks with TaskList and TaskGet, then use TaskUpdate status deleted only on confirmed owned Tasks.
  9. If the native Task tools are unavailable, render the map without claiming it was persisted. For reset, report that owned Tasks could not be inspected or removed; do not guess which Tasks belong to the skill.

Output

Use a stable, concise shape:

🎯 Goal: <goal and any evidenced change>
✅ S1 <stage> → <outcome> — evidence: <source pointer>
↪ S2 <old direction> → <new direction> — evidence: <source pointer>
▶ S3 <current stage> — evidence: <source pointer>
✂ S4 <dropped path> — <reason> — evidence: <source pointer>
⏸ Needs you: <decision or none>
➡ Next: <supported next action or none>

Omit example rows that do not apply. Keep the stage order stable across calls unless the conversation provides evidence to correct it; update the owned Tasks to match any correction.

我的收藏