界面已本地化;技能介绍与说明文档按所选语言由 AI 自动翻译,代码、命令、路径和专业术语保留原文,以原作者文档为准。
探索技能
效率与协作 · SKILL.md

project-stage-detect

project-stage-detect

【效率与协作】Automatically analyze project state, detect stage, identify gaps, and recommend next steps based on existing artifacts.

独立 GitHub 快照 · 自动分类 · 以原作者文档为准

技能说明

GitHub

name: project-stage-detect description: "Automatically analyze project state, detect stage, identify gaps, and recommend next steps based on existing artifacts." argument-hint: "[optional: role filter like 'programmer' or 'designer']" user-invocable: true allowed-tools: Read, Glob, Grep, Bash

Project Stage Detection

This skill scans your project to determine its current development stage, completeness of artifacts, and gaps that need attention. It's especially useful when:

  • Starting with an existing project
  • Onboarding to a codebase
  • Checking what's missing before a milestone
  • Understanding "where are we?"

Workflow

1. Scan Key Directories

Analyze project structure and content:

Design Documentation (design/):

  • Count GDD files in design/gdd/*.md
  • Check for game-concept.md, game-pillars.md, systems-index.md
  • If systems-index.md exists, count total systems vs. designed systems
  • Analyze completeness (Overview, Detailed Design, Edge Cases, etc.)
  • Count narrative docs in design/narrative/
  • Count level designs in design/levels/

Source Code (src/):

  • Count source files (language-agnostic)
  • Identify major systems (directories with 5+ files)
  • Check for core/, gameplay/, ai/, networking/, ui/ directories
  • Estimate lines of code (rough scale)

Production Artifacts (production/):

  • Check for active sprint plans
  • Look for milestone definitions
  • Find roadmap documents

Prototypes (prototypes/):

  • Count prototype directories
  • Check for READMEs (documented vs undocumented)
  • Assess if prototypes are archived or active

Architecture Docs (docs/architecture/):

  • Count ADRs (Architecture Decision Records)
  • Check for overview/index documents

Tests (tests/):

  • Count test files
  • Estimate test coverage (rough heuristic)

2. Classify Project Stage

Based on scanned artifacts, determine stage:

StageIndicators
ConceptNo code or minimal prototype, maybe idea docs
Pre-productionDesign docs started, prototypes, no main src/
ProductionActive src/, sprint plans, growing systems
Post-LaunchReleased, production/ has release history, maintenance focus

3. Collaborative Gap Identification

DO NOT just list missing files. Instead, ask clarifying questions:

  • "I see combat code (src/gameplay/combat/) but no design/gdd/combat-system.md. Was this prototyped first, or should we reverse-document?"
  • "You have 15 ADRs but no architecture overview. Should I create one to help new contributors?"
  • "No sprint plans in production/. Are you tracking work elsewhere (Jira, Trello, etc.)?"
  • "I found a game concept but no systems index. Have you decomposed the concept into individual systems yet, or should we run /design-systems?"
  • "Prototypes directory has 3 projects with no READMEs. Were these experiments, or do they need documentation?"

4. Generate Stage Report

Use template: .claude/docs/templates/project-stage-report.md

Report structure:

# Project Stage Analysis

**Date**: [date]
**Stage**: [Concept/Pre-production/Production/Post-Launch]

## Completeness Overview
- Design: [X%] ([N] docs, [gaps])
- Code: [X%] ([N] files, [systems])
- Architecture: [X%] ([N] ADRs, [gaps])
- Production: [X%] ([status])
- Tests: [X%] ([coverage estimate])

## Gaps Identified
1. [Gap description + clarifying question]
2. [Gap description + clarifying question]

## Recommended Next Steps
[Priority-ordered list based on stage and role]

5. Role-Filtered Recommendations (Optional)

If user provided a role argument (e.g., /project-stage-detect programmer):

Programmer:

  • Focus on architecture docs, test coverage, missing ADRs
  • Code-to-docs gaps

Designer:

  • Focus on GDD completeness, missing design sections
  • Prototype documentation

Producer:

  • Focus on sprint plans, milestone tracking, roadmap
  • Cross-team coordination docs

General (no role):

  • Holistic view of all gaps
  • Highest-priority items across domains

6. Request Approval Before Writing

Collaborative protocol:

I've analyzed your project. Here's what I found:

[Show summary]

Gaps identified:
1. [Gap 1 + question]
2. [Gap 2 + question]

Recommended next steps:
- [Priority 1]
- [Priority 2]
- [Priority 3]

May I write the full stage analysis to production/project-stage-report.md?

Wait for user approval before creating the file.


Example Usage

# General project analysis
/project-stage-detect

# Programmer-focused analysis
/project-stage-detect programmer

# Designer-focused analysis
/project-stage-detect designer

Follow-Up Actions

After generating the report, suggest relevant next steps:

  • Concept exists but no systems index? → /design-systems to decompose into systems
  • Missing design docs? → /reverse-document design src/[system]
  • Missing architecture docs? → /architecture-decision or /reverse-document architecture
  • Prototypes need documentation? → /reverse-document concept prototypes/[name]
  • No sprint plan? → /sprint-plan
  • Approaching milestone? → /milestone-review

Collaborative Protocol

This skill follows the collaborative design principle:

  1. Question First: Ask about gaps, don't assume
  2. Present Options: "Should I create X, or is it tracked elsewhere?"
  3. User Decides: Wait for direction
  4. Show Draft: Display report summary
  5. Get Approval: "May I write to production/project-stage-report.md?"

Never silently write files. Always show findings and ask before creating artifacts.

我的收藏