界面已本地化;技能介绍与说明文档按所选语言由 AI 自动翻译,代码、命令、路径和专业术语保留原文,以原作者文档为准。
探索技能
开发与工程 · SKILL.md

agent-teams

agent-teams

【开发与工程】Team composition knowledge for Claude Code Agent Teams - when teams fit, optimal sizing, spawn prompt patterns. Use only when the user has explicitly enabled agent teams for the session.

独立 GitHub 快照 · 自动分类 · 以原作者文档为准

技能说明

GitHub

name: agent-teams description: Team composition knowledge for Claude Code Agent Teams - when teams fit, optimal sizing, spawn prompt patterns. Use only when the user has explicitly enabled agent teams for the session. allowed-tools: []

Agent Teams Composition Skill

You have expertise in composing and orchestrating Claude Code Agent Teams. Use this knowledge when the user's task would benefit from parallel multi-session work.

Agent teams are off by default. Use them only when the user explicitly started the session with CLAUDE_CODE_EXPERIMENTAL_AGENT_TEAMS=1; otherwise use ordinary subagents, and don't propose teams unprompted.

When Agent Teams Fit

With teams enabled, they fit when:

  • The user asks for comprehensive code review (suggest 3-reviewer team)
  • The task involves work across multiple layers (frontend + backend + database)
  • The user describes a bug with unclear root cause (suggest competing hypothesis investigation)
  • The user wants to evaluate multiple technologies or approaches (suggest research panel)
  • The task can be clearly split into independent, file-separated workstreams

Do NOT suggest agent teams when:

  • The task is sequential or involves same-file edits
  • A single session or subagent would suffice
  • The coordination overhead would exceed the benefit
  • The user is on a tight token budget

Team Templates

Full Review (3 teammates)

Security reviewer + Performance reviewer + Correctness reviewer (edge cases, error paths, callers). Each reviews independently, then lead synthesizes findings.

Feature Dev (3 teammates)

Architect (plan approval required) + Implementer + Reviewer. Architect plans first, implementer follows, reviewer validates the diff by review.

Debug Squad (3-5 teammates)

Each teammate investigates a different hypothesis. Adversarial debate structure -- teammates challenge each other's theories.

Cross-Platform (3 teammates)

iOS developer + Android developer + Shared architect. Each platform teammate owns their own directory. Architect coordinates API contracts.

Full-Stack (3 teammates)

Frontend + Backend + Database. Clear file ownership per layer. Coordinate on API contracts first.

Research Panel (3 teammates)

Simplicity advocate + Performance advocate + Devil's advocate. Each evaluates from a different perspective, then synthesize.

Spawn Prompt Formula

Every spawn prompt should include:

  1. Role: "You are the [role] teammate responsible for [domain]"
  2. Files: "You own files in [directories]. Do not modify files outside your scope."
  3. Focus: "Specifically look for / implement [details]"
  4. Context: "[Project-specific information the teammate needs]"
  5. Deliverable: "Report your findings as [format] / Implement [specific output]"

Cross-Platform Awareness

  • macOS and Linux: full support (in-process + tmux split panes)
  • Windows: in-process mode only (automatic with auto setting)
  • Always use --teammate-mode auto (default) for automatic detection

Related Documentation

  • ~/.claude/docs/AGENT-TEAMS.md - Full guide with examples
  • ~/.claude/docs/reference/workflows/agent-teams.md - Decision framework
  • ~/.claude/commands/assemble-team.md - Quick team assembly command
我的收藏