算法艺术创作
algorithmic-art
通过代码和可调参数创作生成艺术与交互式视觉效果。
retention-design【设计与创意】Design retention and engagement features using the Hook Model. Use when the user says "improve retention", "reduce churn", "make it habit-forming", "engagement design", "hook model", "trigger action reward", "users aren't coming back", "increase DAU/MAU", or wants to design features that bring users back repeatedly - even if they don't explicitly say…
独立 GitHub 快照 · 自动分类 · 以原作者文档为准
name: retention-design description: > Design retention and engagement features using the Hook Model. Use when the user says "improve retention", "reduce churn", "make it habit-forming", "engagement design", "hook model", "trigger action reward", "users aren't coming back", "increase DAU/MAU", or wants to design features that bring users back repeatedly
Based on Hooked by Nir Eyal. The Hook Model is a four-phase loop that drives habit formation in products. Habits require frequent, perceived utility, and a degree of pain when the habit is disrupted. Products that become habits are harder to churn from - not because users are locked in, but because the product genuinely fills a need they return to automatically.
The four phases: Trigger - Action - Variable Reward - Investment
Use this skill ethically. Eyal's own caveat: design habits for products that genuinely improve users' lives. Manipulating users into unhealthy habits is both wrong and unsustainable.
What behavior should become automatic?
Triggers prompt action. Two types:
The goal: move users from external to internal triggers over time.
For your feature: what external trigger will prompt first use? What internal trigger will sustain it?
Eyal's formula: Motivation + Ability + Trigger = Action
Reduce friction on the action:
Fogg's six elements of simplicity: time, money, physical effort, brain cycles, social deviation, non-routine. Reduce the one that's the biggest barrier.
Variable rewards drive repeat behavior (Skinner's research). Three types:
Key: variability is what makes rewards compelling. Predictable rewards lose their pull. Design for some uncertainty in the reward.
Investment makes users more likely to return. Four forms:
Investment also loads the next trigger: "You have 3 unread notifications" brings users back.
Draw the loop explicitly:
Trigger -> [what prompts the behavior]
Action -> [the simplest behavior]
Reward -> [what the user gets, with some uncertainty]
Investment -> [what the user puts in that makes them return]
-> Next Trigger: [how investment loads the next trigger]
Before shipping: would you be comfortable if users knew exactly how you designed this? Would you use this product yourself? Would you recommend it to someone you care about?
1. Designing triggers without investment Bad: Sending notifications that bring users in but give them nothing to do. Good: Every trigger should lead to an action that builds investment.
2. Predictable rewards Bad: "You earned 10 points" every single time. Good: Variable - sometimes 10 points, sometimes a badge, sometimes a streak milestone. Variability sustains engagement.
3. Investment that traps instead of enriches Bad: Making it painful to leave (dark patterns, data hostage-taking). Good: Investment that genuinely improves the product for the user over time.
4. External triggers forever Bad: Users still need a push notification to open the app after 6 months. Good: Design toward internal triggers. If users don't develop internal triggers, the habit hasn't formed.