协作头脑风暴
brainstorming
在实现前澄清需求、探索设计选择,并形成清晰的开发方向。
memex-wrap【开发与工程】Close out a finished memex milestone slice by writing the handoff trail: update `docs/CONTINUE_HERE.md` §1 current-state and §3 next-slice, tick the `docs/ROADMAP.md` scoreboard (milestone header ✅ + version, `- [x]` items), confirm any new observation is logged (deferring to memex-observe), and propose the git tag plus a `MN Slice X:` commit subject…
独立 GitHub 快照 · 自动分类 · 以原作者文档为准
docs/CONTINUE_HERE.md §1 current-state and §3 next-slice, tick the
docs/ROADMAP.md scoreboard (milestone header ✅ + version, - [x] items),
confirm any new observation is logged (deferring to memex-observe), and
propose the git tag plus a MN Slice X: commit subject. Use after you finish
a milestone slice in the memex repo and before you commit/tag it, when handing
the next slice to a fresh session, or whenever CONTINUE_HERE and ROADMAP have
drifted behind what actually shipped.
license: MIT
allowed-tools: Read Edit Bash
metadata:
author: Philipp Thoss
version: "1.0"
domain: memex
complexity: intermediate
language: multi
tags: memex, handoff, milestone, continue-here, roadmapClose the loop on a finished slice. A slice ships code; the wrap ships the
trail that lets the next session resume without re-deriving where things
stand. Two docs carry that trail — docs/CONTINUE_HERE.md (where we are,
what's next) and docs/ROADMAP.md (the milestone scoreboard) — and the
wrap leaves both consistent with what actually landed. It does not log
observations or run the verification gates itself; it confirms the first was
done (deferring to memex-observe) and hands off to the second (memex-verify).
- [x]-sized
unit of work) and are about to commit and tag it.CONTINUE_HERE.md to point at the right starting line.CONTINUE_HERE.md §1 or ROADMAP.md's scoreboard has drifted behind
what actually shipped, and you want to reconcile them before moving on.cwd = repo root (a
checkout of github.com/pjt222/memex). All paths below are repo-relative.docs/CONTINUE_HERE.md and docs/ROADMAP.md present and
writable.$MEMEX_STORE_PATH / $MEMEX_PG_URL — only needed if Step 3
ends up logging a new observation, and even then the logging itself is
delegated to memex-observe, which owns those prerequisites.This skill edits docs and proposes git commands. It does not push, tag, or
run the test gate — those belong to commit-changes and memex-verify.
docs/CONTINUE_HERE.md §1 (current state) and §3 (next slice)Read the file first; both sections are prose with a specific shape you must match, not free-form.
# Orient: the "Last updated" line, §1 Current state, §3 Next milestone
sed -n '1,40p' docs/CONTINUE_HERE.md
awk '/^## 1\./,/^## 2\./' docs/CONTINUE_HERE.md
awk '/^## 3\./,/^## 3a\./' docs/CONTINUE_HERE.md
Then edit (use the Edit tool — keep surrounding prose intact):
Last updated: line near the top — set today's date and a one-line
summary of the slice (mirror the existing format: date — what landed +
the commit short-SHAs + branch + state).M_ ... (shortsha, tag vX.Y.Z)
cadence. If the slice opened new tech-debt or deferrals, note them where
the section already tracks those.ROADMAP.md). If the milestone has more
slices left, narrow §3's "tasks in order" to the next slice so the
fresh session starts on the right line.Expected: §1 names the just-shipped slice under Shipped with its SHA(s)
and (if a milestone closed) tag; §3 describes the next concrete slice. The
Last updated: line reflects today.
On failure: If the section headers don't match (## 1. / ## 3.), the
doc has been restructured — re-read it top-to-bottom and adapt to its current
headings rather than forcing the old shape. Never fabricate a SHA; if the
commit doesn't exist yet, write (<commit pending>) and fill it after Step 4.
docs/ROADMAP.md scoreboardThe scoreboard encodes completion two ways: a milestone header gains a
✅ (vX.Y.Z) suffix when the milestone is done, and each finished line item
flips - [ ] to - [x]. Read the relevant block first.
# Find the milestone block you're closing items in
awk '/^## M5/,/^## M6/' docs/ROADMAP.md
Then, with the Edit tool:
- [ ] into - [x].
Leave genuinely-incomplete or deferred items as - [ ] (a deferred item
often carries a — deferred to MX.Y note; preserve it). ✅ (vX.Y.Z) to the ## MN — ... header, matching shipped milestones
above it (e.g. ## M4 — MCP ✅ (v0.4.0)). A milestone with any unchecked,
non-deferred item is not done — do not flag its header.Expected: Every item the slice completed reads - [x]; the header shows
✅ (vX.Y.Z) if and only if all of its non-deferred items are checked. The
new version matches the tag you propose in Step 4.
On failure: If you're unsure whether an item is truly done versus
partially done, leave it - [ ] and note the partial state in
CONTINUE_HERE.md §1 instead — an over-optimistic scoreboard is the exact
drift this skill exists to prevent. Match the existing checkbox/version
formatting; don't invent a new style.
memex-observe)A slice that surfaced a bias, a near-miss, or a reusable lesson should have a matching observation in the bias-log. The wrap's job is to confirm that — not to author the entry or restate the logging CLI.
# Quick existence check: does the bias-log already hold this slice's lesson?
sed -n '1,40p' docs/OBSERVATIONS.md
Decide:
CONTINUE_HERE.md §1
("no new observations this slice") so the next session knows it was
considered, not skipped, and move on.memex-observe skill to
add it. That skill owns the memex add --type observation ... command shape
(body piped via stdin, --title required) and the prerequisites. Do not
restate or inline that command here — invoke the skill.The observation body shape lives in docs/OBSERVATIONS.md (the
authoritative "Two paths to add an observation" block is lines 10–21). The
current form (example, current as of v0.4.0; parsed by
crates/memex-extract/src/meditate_vipassana.rs) is:
N. **Title.** Body sentence(s). Mitigation: <what to do next time>. Origin: <date> + <context>.
Treat docs/OBSERVATIONS.md lines 10–21 as the source of truth for this
shape — if it has moved on from the v0.4.0 form, follow the file, not this
example.
Expected: Either a recorded decision that there's nothing to log (noted
in §1), or a new observation added via memex-observe with the next entry
number.
On failure: If you can't tell whether a lesson is observation-worthy, err toward logging it — a redundant observation costs little; a lost one costs a re-derivation next session.
Don't commit or tag here — propose both so the operator (or the
commit-changes skill) can execute them. Use the memex commit convention:
subject = MN Slice X: <summary>.
# Surface what's staged/unstaged so the proposed subject matches reality
git -C . status --short
git -C . diff --stat
Propose:
MN Slice X: <imperative summary> (e.g.
M5 Slice A: per-file project helper + watcher skeleton). Keep the
subject tight; put the why and the doc-trail updates in the body.✅ (vX.Y.Z) you set in Step 2 (e.g. v0.5.0
for M5). A mid-milestone slice gets a commit but no tag — say so
explicitly rather than proposing a tag.Present both as a ready-to-run block for the operator to confirm:
Proposed commit subject: M5 Slice A: per-file project helper + watcher skeleton
Proposed tag: (none — mid-milestone slice; tag at M5 close as v0.5.0)
Expected: A clearly-labeled proposal: one commit subject in
MN Slice X: form, and either a concrete vX.Y.Z tag (milestone close) or
an explicit "no tag this slice" note. Nothing is committed or tagged by this
skill.
On failure: If the milestone number / slice letter is ambiguous, read
ROADMAP.md and CONTINUE_HERE.md §3 to fix the MN and X; never guess
a version — derive it from the scoreboard you just ticked in Step 2.
CONTINUE_HERE.md §1 lists the just-shipped slice under Shipped with
its commit SHA(s), and Last updated: reflects todayCONTINUE_HERE.md §3 points at the next concrete slice (advanced to the
next milestone if this slice closed one)ROADMAP.md item the slice completed is now - [x]; deferred
items remain - [ ] with their deferral notes intactROADMAP.md milestone header carries ✅ (vX.Y.Z) iff all its
non-deferred items are checkedmemex-observe, or §1 explicitly
records that none was neededMN Slice X: form is proposed, plus a concrete
tag (milestone close) or an explicit "no tag" note — nothing committed
or tagged by this skill✅
on the header is an all-items claim. Tick items in Step 2 first, then check
the header only if nothing non-deferred remains.memex add to memex-observe. Inlining the command
duplicates a surface that drifts — reference the skill instead.memex init. That is the CLI store/db setup command, not part
of any wrap or session ritual. Wrapping a slice never calls memex init.git log after the commit exists. Use a
(pending) placeholder rather than a fabricated value.commit-changes' job, and the test/format gate is memex-verify's. Keep
the boundary — don't let the heaviest skill absorb its neighbors.memex-verify, and even there the gate is exit 0 / "test result: ok" —
counts (e.g. "~60 at v0.4.0") are informational and grow per milestone.## 1. / ## 3. or
the scoreboard headings have changed, adapt to the file as it is now; the
doc-reading order itself is owned by adapters/session-init.txt.memex-init — the session-start counterpart: loads the trail this skill
writes. Wrap closes the loop that init opens.memex-observe — owns logging a bias-log observation; Step 3 defers to it
rather than restating its CLI.memex-verify — runs the test/format/build gate; the wrap proposes the
commit, verify confirms the slice is green before it lands.write-continue-here — the general-purpose continuation-file skill; this
skill is its memex-specific specialization for §1/§3 and the scoreboard.commit-changes — executes the commit subject and tag that Step 4 proposes.