算法艺术创作
algorithmic-art
通过代码和可调参数创作生成艺术与交互式视觉效果。
ornament-style-color【设计与创意】Design polychromatic ornamental patterns grounded in Alexander Speltz's classical ornament taxonomy. Builds on monochrome structural analysis by adding period-authentic color palettes, color-to-motif mapping, and rendering styles suited to painted, illuminated, and glazed ornament. Use when creating decorative designs where color is integral to the t…
独立 GitHub 快照 · 自动分类 · 以原作者文档为准
合史色學+AI 生像作彩飾。承 ornament-style-mono 之構基,加期實彩盤+色和則+彩、繪、釉飾之渲法。
擇期+識其色語。飾之色非偶—各期之盤本於可得之顏料、文化象、材境。
Historical Ornament Periods with Characteristic Palettes:
┌───────────────────┬─────────────────┬────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐
│ Period │ Date Range │ Characteristic Palette │
├───────────────────┼─────────────────┼────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┤
│ Egyptian │ 3100–332 BCE │ Lapis blue, gold/ochre, terracotta red, black, white │
│ │ │ Mineral pigments: flat, unmodulated, high contrast │
├───────────────────┼─────────────────┼────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┤
│ Greek │ 800–31 BCE │ Terracotta red, black, ochre, white, blue (rare) │
│ │ │ Pottery palette; architectural color largely lost │
├───────────────────┼─────────────────┼────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┤
│ Roman │ 509 BCE–476 CE │ Pompeii red, ochre yellow, black, white, verdigris │
│ │ │ Fresco palette: warm earth tones, strong red dominant │
├───────────────────┼─────────────────┼────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┤
│ Byzantine │ 330–1453 CE │ Gold (dominant), deep blue, crimson, purple, white │
│ │ │ Mosaic tesserae: jewel tones, gold ground, luminous │
├───────────────────┼─────────────────┼────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┤
│ Islamic │ 7th–17th c. │ Turquoise/cobalt blue, white, gold, emerald green │
│ │ │ Tile glazes: luminous, saturated, geometric precision │
├───────────────────┼─────────────────┼────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┤
│ Romanesque │ 1000–1200 CE │ Ochre, rust red, deep green, dark blue, cream │
│ │ │ Manuscript and stone: earthy, muted, mineral-derived │
├───────────────────┼─────────────────┼────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┤
│ Gothic │ 1150–1500 CE │ Ultramarine blue, ruby red, emerald green, gold, white │
│ │ │ Stained glass + illumination: saturated, luminous │
├───────────────────┼─────────────────┼────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┤
│ Renaissance │ 1400–1600 CE │ Rich earth tones, azure blue, gold leaf, warm greens │
│ │ │ Oil and fresco: naturalistic, modulated, subtle │
├───────────────────┼─────────────────┼────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┤
│ Baroque/Rococo │ 1600–1780 CE │ Pastel pink, powder blue, cream, gold, soft green │
│ │ │ (Rococo) vs deep burgundy, gold, forest green (Baroque) │
├───────────────────┼─────────────────┼────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┤
│ Art Nouveau │ 1890–1910 CE │ Sage green, dusty rose, amber/gold, muted purple, │
│ │ │ teal. Organic, muted, nature-derived palette │
└───────────────────┴─────────────────┴────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘
得: 期+盤+材境明識。
敗: 用者求表外之期→以 WebSearch「[期] ornament color palette pigments」研其色語、立同條目。期顏料可得性為實導。
譯史盤為 3-5 色具角集。
色角框:
Color Distribution (60/30/10 Rule):
┌──────────────┬────────────┬──────────────────────────────────────────┐
│ Role │ Proportion │ Function │
├──────────────┼────────────┼──────────────────────────────────────────┤
│ Dominant │ ~60% │ Ground color or primary structural color │
│ Secondary │ ~30% │ Motif fill or supporting structural color │
│ Accent │ ~10% │ Highlights, details, focal points │
│ (Optional) │ — │ Additional accent or metallic (gold) │
│ (Optional) │ — │ Background / ground if different from │
│ │ │ dominant │
└──────────────┴────────────┴──────────────────────────────────────────┘
色和法:
例盤:
得: 3-5 色+角+比+和+情皆定。
敗: 色擇覺隨—錨於材境。問:「何顏料可得?」「何為地材?」(金箔於犢、釉於陶、漆於灰)—材限+實盤。
解所擇紋之構文法、承單色析+色↔構映。
行同 ornament-style-mono 步二之構析:
加 色↔構映:
例映:
Islamic Star Pattern:
- Star forms: turquoise (dominant)
- Interlocking geometric ground: white (secondary)
- Star center details: cobalt blue (accent)
- Outline/border: gold (detail)
→ Color follows form strictly — each geometric shape is one flat color
得: 構述+各構元之具色賦。
敗: 映不明→以 WebSearch「[期] [紋] ornament color」覽史例—史飾幾必以色明構、勿掩。
立 Z-Image 生用之文 prompt、含色+渲法。
Prompt 模:
[Rendering style] of [motif name] ornament in the [period] style,
[composition type], [color palette description],
[color mood], [structural details from Step 3],
[application context], [additional qualifiers]
色適渲法:
painted ornament—筆觸見、實色、壁畫/油畫質illuminated manuscript—金箔、富寶色、犢地glazed ceramic tile—亮面、平色、緣精stained glass—透色、形間黑鉛watercolor illustration—透洗、軟緣、紙見enamel on metal—硬亮色、金地mosaic—小磚、間隙見、明printed poster—平色區、新藝/工藝美Prompt 中色描:
例 prompt:
glazed ceramic tile ornament in the Islamic style, geometric star pattern, turquoise blue and white with cobalt blue accents and gold outlines, vivid saturated colors, repeating tessellation, Iznik tilework qualityilluminated manuscript border in the Gothic style, vine and trefoil ornament, ultramarine blue and ruby red with gold leaf details on cream vellum, rich jewel tones, vertical panel, medieval book of hours qualitywatercolor illustration of Art Nouveau floral ornament, whiplash curves with lily motif, sage green and dusty rose with amber gold accents, muted organic tones, vertical panel, Alphonse Mucha influence得: 25-50 字 prompt、明渲法、紋、期、構、色。
敗: 生色不合盤→色描置 prompt 前(紋前)—Z-Image 重前 token。亦可名具 hex 或顏料名(ultramarine、vermillion、ochre)。
擇解+生參。彩飾常須步多於單色。
Resolution by Application (same as ornament-style-mono):
┌────────────────────┬─────────────────────┬────────────────────────────────┐
│ Application │ Recommended │ Rationale │
├────────────────────┼─────────────────────┼────────────────────────────────┤
│ Medallion / Roundel│ 1024x1024 (1:1) │ Radial symmetry needs square │
│ Tile / Repeat Unit │ 1024x1024 (1:1) │ Square for seamless tiling │
│ Horizontal Frieze │ 1280x720 (16:9) │ Wide format for running border │
│ Vertical Panel │ 720x1280 (9:16) │ Portrait format for columns │
│ Wide Border │ 1344x576 (21:9) │ Ultrawide for architectural │
│ General / Flexible │ 1152x896 (9:7) │ Balanced landscape format │
│ Large Detail │ 1536x1536 (1:1) │ Higher res for fine color work │
└────────────────────┴─────────────────────┴────────────────────────────────┘
steps 10-12(色細+盤準須多步)shift 為 3(默)random_seed: true、重生則 random_seed: false+具種得: 全參定。彩飾通須 ≥ 10 步以盤忠。
敗: 不定→1024x1024 + 10 步—諸彩境之穩默。
呼 Z-Image MCP 具:
mcp__hf-mcp-server__gr1_z_image_turbo_generate:
prompt:步四所立resolution:步五steps:步五(薦 10-12)shift:步五random_seed:步五seed:若 random_seed 為假則具種得: 生像有可識飾形+見色。色或非全合—評時治之。
敗: MCP 不可達→驗 hf-mcp-server 已配(見 configure-mcp-server/troubleshoot-mcp-connection)。生像全抽→prompt 須具構語—回步四。色全錯→色名置 prompt 前。
依五準評。
Polychromatic Ornament Evaluation Rubric:
┌─────────────────────┬───────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐
│ Criterion │ Evaluation Questions │
├─────────────────────┼───────────────────────────────────────────────────────┤
│ 1. Palette Match │ Do the colors in the image approximate the specified │
│ │ palette? Are the named colors present? Are there │
│ │ unwanted colors that break the palette? │
├─────────────────────┼───────────────────────────────────────────────────────┤
│ 2. Color │ Does the color distribution roughly follow the │
│ Distribution │ 60/30/10 allocation? Is the dominant color actually │
│ │ dominant? Does the accent appear sparingly? │
├─────────────────────┼───────────────────────────────────────────────────────┤
│ 3. Rendering Style │ Does the image look like the specified rendering │
│ │ style? Does a "glazed tile" look glossy and flat? │
│ │ Does "illuminated manuscript" show gold and vellum? │
├─────────────────────┼───────────────────────────────────────────────────────┤
│ 4. Period Accuracy │ Would this design be recognizable as belonging to │
│ │ the specified period? Are motifs period-appropriate? │
│ │ Does the color usage match period conventions? │
├─────────────────────┼───────────────────────────────────────────────────────┤
│ 5. Form-Color │ Does color clarify the ornamental structure or │
│ Balance │ obscure it? Can you "read" the motifs through the │
│ │ color? Does color follow form as intended? │
└─────────────────────┴───────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘
得: 評有具觀。彩比單難控—初生盤+分多為「足」。
敗: 多弱→prompt 須根本重構。常修:色名置 prompt 至前、減色、明指地色、增步至 12。
針對性迭或受。
色迭策:
迭預算: 各概念限 3 迭。彩比單須更多 prompt 調。
得: 1-2 迭後色忠改善。完盤合難—求「可識為合色族」即可。
敗: 迭不收→盤或過具於模能重—簡至少色(5→3)、用廣描(「warm earth tones」非具 hex)、或受最近之近似。
立全錄以重+參。
得: 可重之錄、全色文+hex 約+盤析。
敗: 全錄覺繁→至少錄終 prompt、種、欲↔實色單—足以重+後迭調盤。
ornament-style-mono 修構ornament-style-monoreview-web-designmeditate