Writing Skills
writing-skills
效率与协作技能,来自 obra/superpowers,查看原文获取完整用途和操作说明。
optimize-cloud-costs【部署与运维】Implement cloud cost optimization strategies for Kubernetes workloads using tools like Kubecost for visibility, right-sizing recommendations, horizontal and vertical pod autoscaling, spot/preemptible instances, and resource quotas. Covers cost allocation, showback reporting, and continuous optimization practices. Use when cloud costs are growing with…
独立 GitHub 快照 · 自动分类 · 以原作者文档为准
Cut k8s cloud spend.
See Extended Examples for complete configuration files and templates.
Kubecost / OpenCost.
Install Kubecost:
# Add Kubecost Helm repository
helm repo add kubecost https://kubecost.github.io/cost-analyzer/
helm repo update
# Install Kubecost with Prometheus integration
helm install kubecost kubecost/cost-analyzer \
--namespace kubecost \
--create-namespace \
--set kubecostToken="your-token-here" \
--set prometheus.server.global.external_labels.cluster_id="production-cluster" \
--set prometheus.nodeExporter.enabled=true \
--set prometheus.serviceAccounts.nodeExporter.create=true
# For existing Prometheus, configure Kubecost to use it
helm install kubecost kubecost/cost-analyzer \
--namespace kubecost \
--create-namespace \
--set prometheus.enabled=false \
--set global.prometheus.fqdn="http://prometheus-server.monitoring.svc.cluster.local" \
--set global.prometheus.enabled=true
# Verify installation
kubectl get pods -n kubecost
kubectl get svc -n kubecost
# Access Kubecost UI
kubectl port-forward -n kubecost svc/kubecost-cost-analyzer 9090:9090
# Open http://localhost:9090
Cloud provider integration:
# kubecost-cloud-integration.yaml
apiVersion: v1
kind: Secret
metadata:
name: cloud-integration
namespace: kubecost
type: Opaque
stringData:
# For AWS
cloud-integration.json: |
{
"aws": [
{
"serviceKeyName": "AWS_ACCESS_KEY_ID",
"serviceKeySecret": "AWS_SECRET_ACCESS_KEY",
"athenaProjectID": "cur-query-results",
"athenaBucketName": "s3://your-cur-bucket",
"athenaRegion": "us-east-1",
"athenaDatabase": "athenacurcfn_my_cur",
"athenaTable": "my_cur"
}
]
}
---
# For GCP
apiVersion: v1
kind: Secret
metadata:
name: gcp-key
namespace: kubecost
type: Opaque
data:
key.json: <base64-encoded-service-account-key>
---
# For Azure
apiVersion: v1
kind: ConfigMap
metadata:
name: azure-config
namespace: kubecost
data:
azure.json: |
{
"azureSubscriptionID": "your-subscription-id",
"azureClientID": "your-client-id",
"azureClientSecret": "your-client-secret",
"azureTenantID": "your-tenant-id",
"azureOfferDurableID": "MS-AZR-0003P"
}
Apply:
kubectl apply -f kubecost-cloud-integration.yaml
# Verify cloud costs are being imported
kubectl logs -n kubecost -l app=cost-analyzer -c cost-model --tail=100 | grep -i "cloud"
# Check Kubecost API for cost data
kubectl port-forward -n kubecost svc/kubecost-cost-analyzer 9090:9090 &
curl http://localhost:9090/model/allocation\?window\=7d | jq .
→ Kubecost pods running. UI shows breakdown by ns/deployment/pod. Cloud costs importing (24-48h initial sync). API returns allocation data.
If err:
kubectl get svc -n monitoring prometheus-serverkubectl logs -n kubecost -l app=cost-analyzer -c cost-modelID over-provisioned + opportunities.
Query utilization:
# Get resource requests vs usage for all pods
kubectl top pods --all-namespaces --containers | \
awk 'NR>1 {print $1,$2,$3,$4,$5}' > current-usage.txt
# Compare requests to actual usage
cat <<'EOF' > analyze-utilization.sh
#!/bin/bash
echo "Pod,Namespace,CPU-Request,CPU-Usage,Memory-Request,Memory-Usage"
for ns in $(kubectl get ns -o jsonpath='{.items[*].metadata.name}'); do
kubectl get pods -n $ns -o json | jq -r '
.items[] |
select(.status.phase == "Running") |
{
name: .metadata.name,
namespace: .metadata.namespace,
containers: [
.spec.containers[] |
{
name: .name,
cpuReq: .resources.requests.cpu,
memReq: .resources.requests.memory
}
]
} |
"\(.name),\(.namespace),\(.containers[].cpuReq // "none"),\(.containers[].memReq // "none")"
' 2>/dev/null
done
EOF
chmod +x analyze-utilization.sh
./analyze-utilization.sh > resource-requests.csv
# Get actual usage from metrics server
kubectl top pods --all-namespaces --containers > actual-usage.txt
Kubecost recommendations:
# Get right-sizing recommendations via API
curl "http://localhost:9090/model/savings/requestSizing?window=7d" | jq . > recommendations.json
# Extract top wasteful resources
jq '.data[] | select(.totalRecommendedSavings > 10) | {
cluster: .clusterID,
# ... (see EXAMPLES.md for complete configuration)
Util dashboard:
# grafana-utilization-dashboard.yaml
apiVersion: v1
kind: ConfigMap
metadata:
name: utilization-dashboard
namespace: monitoring
# ... (see EXAMPLES.md for complete configuration)
→ Clear view requests vs actual. ID pods <30% util (over-provision). List opportunities + savings est. Trend dashboard.
If err:
kubectl get deployment metrics-server -n kube-systemcurl http://prometheus:9090/api/v1/query?query=node_cpu_seconds_totalAuto-scale on CPU/mem/custom metrics.
HPA CPU-based:
# hpa-cpu.yaml
apiVersion: autoscaling/v2
kind: HorizontalPodAutoscaler
metadata:
name: api-server-hpa
namespace: production
# ... (see EXAMPLES.md for complete configuration)
Deploy + verify:
kubectl apply -f hpa-cpu.yaml
# Check HPA status
kubectl get hpa -n production
kubectl describe hpa api-server-hpa -n production
# Monitor scaling events
kubectl get events -n production --field-selector involvedObject.kind=HorizontalPodAutoscaler --watch
# Generate load to test autoscaling
kubectl run load-generator --rm -it --image=busybox -- /bin/sh -c \
"while true; do wget -q -O- http://api-server.production.svc.cluster.local; done"
# Watch replicas scale
watch kubectl get hpa,deployment -n production
→ HPA shows current/target. Scales up under load, down after stabilization. Events logged. No thrashing.
If err:
kubectl get apiservice v1beta1.metrics.k8s.iokubectl describe hpa api-server-hpa -n productionkubectl logs -n kube-system -l app=kube-controller-manager | grep horizontal-pod-autoscalerAuto-adjust requests by usage patterns.
Install:
# Clone VPA repository
git clone https://github.com/kubernetes/autoscaler.git
cd autoscaler/vertical-pod-autoscaler
# Install VPA
./hack/vpa-up.sh
# Verify installation
kubectl get pods -n kube-system | grep vpa
# Check VPA CRDs
kubectl get crd | grep verticalpodautoscaler
VPA policies:
# vpa-policies.yaml
apiVersion: autoscaling.k8s.io/v1
kind: VerticalPodAutoscaler
metadata:
name: api-server-vpa
namespace: production
# ... (see EXAMPLES.md for complete configuration)
Deploy + monitor:
kubectl apply -f vpa-policies.yaml
# Check VPA recommendations
kubectl get vpa -n production
kubectl describe vpa api-server-vpa -n production
# View detailed recommendations
kubectl get vpa api-server-vpa -n production -o jsonpath='{.status.recommendation}' | jq .
# Monitor VPA-initiated pod updates
kubectl get events -n production --field-selector involvedObject.kind=VerticalPodAutoscaler --watch
# Compare recommendations to current requests
kubectl get deployment api-server -n production -o json | \
jq '.spec.template.spec.containers[].resources.requests'
→ VPA gives recommendations or auto-updates requests. Recs based on percentile (typ P95). Pods restart in Auto/Recreate mode. No HPA-VPA conflict (HPA→replicas, VPA→per-pod).
If err:
kubectl get pods -n kube-system | grep vpakubectl logs -n kube-system -l app=vpa-admission-controllerkubectl get mutatingwebhookconfigurations vpa-webhook-configCost-effective spot scheduling.
Spot node pools:
# For AWS (via Karpenter)
apiVersion: karpenter.sh/v1alpha5
kind: Provisioner
metadata:
name: spot-provisioner
spec:
# ... (see EXAMPLES.md for complete configuration)
Workloads for spot:
# spot-workload.yaml
apiVersion: apps/v1
kind: Deployment
metadata:
name: batch-processor
namespace: production
# ... (see EXAMPLES.md for complete configuration)
Deploy + monitor:
kubectl apply -f spot-workload.yaml
# Monitor spot node allocation
kubectl get nodes -l node-type=spot
# Check workload distribution
# ... (see EXAMPLES.md for complete configuration)
→ Workloads on spot. Big savings (typ 60-90% vs on-demand). Graceful interruptions w/ pod reschedule. Monitor interruption rate + recovery.
If err:
kubectl logs -n karpenter -l app.kubernetes.io/name=karpenterHard limits + cost control.
Resource quotas:
# resource-quotas.yaml
apiVersion: v1
kind: ResourceQuota
metadata:
name: production-quota
namespace: production
# ... (see EXAMPLES.md for complete configuration)
Budget alerts:
# kubecost-budget-alerts.yaml
apiVersion: v1
kind: ConfigMap
metadata:
name: budget-alerts
namespace: kubecost
# ... (see EXAMPLES.md for complete configuration)
Apply + monitor:
kubectl apply -f resource-quotas.yaml
kubectl apply -f kubecost-budget-alerts.yaml
# Check quota usage
kubectl get resourcequota -n production
kubectl describe resourcequota production-quota -n production
# ... (see EXAMPLES.md for complete configuration)
→ Quotas enforce limits per ns. Pod creation blocked over quota. Alerts fire on threshold breach. Spike detect works. Reports to stakeholders.
If err:
kubectl get resourcequota,limitrange -Akubectl get events -n production | grep quotakubectl logs -n kubecost -l app=cost-analyzer | grep alertcurl http://prometheus:9090/api/v1/query?query=kubecost_monthly_costdeploy-to-kubernetes — app deployment w/ proper requestssetup-prometheus-monitoring — monitoring infra for cost metricsplan-capacity — capacity planning (cost+perf)setup-local-kubernetes — local dev avoids cloudwrite-helm-chart — template requests + limitsimplement-gitops-workflow — GitOps for cost-optimized configs