---

name: test-team-coordination locale: caveman source_locale: en source_commit: 82c77053 fence_basis_commit: 82c77053 translator: "Julius Brussee homage — caveman" translation_date: "2026-05-03" description: > Execute a test scenario against a team, observing coordination pattern behaviors, evaluating acceptance criteria, and generating a structured RESULT.md. Use when validating that a team's coordination pattern produces the expected behaviors during a realistic task, comparing coordination patterns on equivalent workloads, or establishing baseline performance for a team composition. license: MIT allowed-tools: Read Write Edit Bash Grep Glob Agent SendMessage TaskCreate metadata: author: Philipp Thoss version: "1.0" domain: review complexity: advanced language: natural tags: review, testing, teams, coordination, validation

Test Team Coordination

Execute test scenario from tests/scenarios/teams/ against target team. Observe coordination pattern behaviors, evaluate acceptance criteria, score rubric, produce RESULT.md in tests/results/.

When Use

• Validate team's coordination pattern produces expected behaviors
• Run structured test after modifying team definition or agent
• Compare coordination patterns by running same scenario with different teams
• Establish baseline performance metrics for team composition
• Regression testing after adding new agents or changing team membership

Inputs

• Required: Path to test scenario file (e.g., tests/scenarios/teams/test-opaque-team-cartographers-audit.md)
• Optional: Run ID override (default: YYYY-MM-DD-<target>-NNN auto-generated)
• Optional: Team size override (default: from scenario frontmatter)
• Optional: Skip scope change (default: false — inject scope change if defined)

Steps

Step 1: Load and Validate Test Scenario

1.1. Read the test scenario file specified in the input.

1.2. Parse YAML frontmatter and extract:

• target — the team to test
• coordination-pattern — the expected pattern
• team-size — number of members to spawn
• Acceptance criteria table
• Scoring rubric (if present)
• Ground truth data (if present)

1.3. Verify the scenario file has all required sections:

• Objective
• Pre-conditions
• Task (with Primary Task subsection)
• Expected Behaviors
• Acceptance Criteria
• Observation Protocol

Got: Scenario file loads, parses, contains all required sections.

If fail: File missing or unparseable? Abort with error message identifying missing file or malformed section. Optional sections (Rubric, Ground Truth, Variants) absent? Note absence, continue.

Step 2: Verify Pre-conditions

2.1. Walk through each pre-condition checkbox in the scenario.

2.2. For file-existence checks, use Glob to verify.

2.3. For registry count checks, parse the relevant _registry.yml and compare total_* against actual file counts on disk.

2.4. For branch/git state checks, run git status --porcelain and git branch --show-current.

Got: All pre-conditions satisfied.

If fail: Any pre-condition fails? Record as BLOCKED in results. Decide whether to proceed (soft pre-condition) or abort (hard pre-condition like missing target team file). Document decision.

Step 3: Load Coordination Pattern Criteria

3.1. Read tests/_registry.yml and locate the coordination_patterns entry matching the scenario's coordination-pattern value.

3.2. Extract the key_behaviors list for this pattern.

3.3. These behaviors become the observation checklist — each must be watched for during execution and recorded as observed/not observed.

Got: Pattern key behaviors loaded, ready for observation.

If fail: Coordination pattern not defined in registry? Use scenario's Expected Behaviors section as sole observation source. Log warning.

Step 4: Execute Task

4.1. Create the result directory: tests/results/YYYY-MM-DD-<target>-NNN/.

4.2. Record T0 (task start timestamp).

4.3. Read the target team's definition from teams/<target>.md, extract the CONFIG block, and activate the team: call TeamCreate with the team name, spawn teammates using each member's subagent_type, and create tasks from the CONFIG tasks list. Use the team-size from the scenario. Pass the Primary Task prompt verbatim from the scenario's Task section.

4.4. Observe the team's execution phases. Record timestamps for:

• T1: Form assessment / task decomposition complete
• T2: Role assignments visible

4.5. If the scenario defines a Scope Change Trigger and skip-scope-change is false:

• Wait until Phase 2 (role assignment) is visible
• Record T3 (scope change injection timestamp)
• Send the scope change prompt to the team via SendMessage
• Record T4 (scope change absorbed — role adjustment visible)

4.6. Continue observing until the team delivers its output.

• Record T5 (integration begins)
• Record T6 (final report delivered)

4.7. Capture the team's complete output.

Got: Team executes task through coordination pattern phases. Timestamps recorded for all transitions. Scope change (if applicable) injected and absorbed.

If fail: Team fails produce output? Record failure point and any error messages. Team stalls? Note last observed phase and timeout. Proceed to evaluation with partial results.

Step 5: Evaluate Pattern Behaviors

5.1. For each key behavior from Step 3, determine whether it was observed during execution:

• Observed: Clear evidence in the team's output or coordination
• Partial: Some evidence but incomplete or ambiguous
• Not observed: No evidence

5.2. For each task-specific behavior from the scenario's Expected Behaviors section, apply the same evaluation.

5.3. Record findings in the observation log.

Got: All or most pattern-specific and task-specific behaviors observed.

If fail: Unobserved behaviors are findings, not failures of test procedure. Record accurately — they indicate coordination pattern did not fully manifest.

Step 6: Evaluate Acceptance Criteria

6.1. Walk through each acceptance criterion from the scenario.

6.2. For each criterion, assign a determination:

• PASS: Criterion clearly met with observable evidence
• PARTIAL: Criterion partially met (counts toward threshold at 0.5 weight)
• FAIL: Criterion not met despite opportunity
• BLOCKED: Could not evaluate (pre-condition failure, team timeout, etc.)

6.3. If the scenario includes Ground Truth data, verify reported findings against it:

• Calculate accuracy percentages per category
• Flag false positives and false negatives

6.4. If the scenario includes a Scoring Rubric, score each dimension 1-5 with brief justification.

6.5. Calculate summary metrics:

• Acceptance: X/N criteria passed (PARTIAL counts as 0.5)
• Threshold: PASS if >= threshold defined in scenario
• Rubric total: X/Y points (if applicable)

Got: All acceptance criteria have determination. Summary metrics calculated.

If fail: Fewer than half criteria can be evaluated (too many BLOCKED)? Test run inconclusive. Document why, recommend re-running after fixing pre-conditions.

Step 7: Generate RESULT.md

7.1. Create tests/results/YYYY-MM-DD-<target>-NNN/RESULT.md using the Recording Template from the scenario's Observation Protocol.

7.2. Populate all sections:

• Run metadata (observer, timestamps, duration)
• Phase log with all recorded timestamps
• Role emergence log (for adaptive/team tests)
• Acceptance criteria results table
• Rubric scores table (if applicable)
• Ground truth verification table (if applicable)
• Key observations (narrative)
• Lessons learned

7.3. Include the team's raw output as an appendix or in a separate file (team-output.md) in the same result directory.

7.4. Add a summary verdict at the top:

**Verdict**: PASS | FAIL | INCONCLUSIVE
**Score**: X/N criteria (Y/Z rubric points)
**Duration**: Xm

Got: Complete RESULT.md with all sections populated and clear verdict.

If fail: Result file cannot be written? Output results to stdout as fallback. Evaluation data should never be lost.

Checks

• Test scenario file loaded, all required sections present
• Pre-conditions verified (or documented as BLOCKED)
• Coordination pattern key behaviors loaded from registry
• Team spawned, task delivered
• Scope change injected at right time (if applicable)
• All pattern-specific behaviors evaluated (observed/partial/not observed)
• All acceptance criteria have determination (PASS/PARTIAL/FAIL/BLOCKED)
• Ground truth verification completed (if applicable)
• RESULT.md generated with all sections populated
• Summary verdict calculated and recorded

Pitfalls

• Evaluate output quality instead of coordination: This skill tests how team coordinates, not whether task output is perfect. Team that coordinates well but finds only 7/9 broken refs still demonstrates pattern.
• Inject scope change too early: Wait until role assignment clear visible before injecting scope change. Too early means team hasn't differentiated yet, so nothing to adapt.
• Conflate team member output with team output: Opaque team should present unified output. See individual member reports? That's finding about opacity, not test infrastructure problem.
• Exact ground truth matching: Ground truth counts approximate. Evaluate whether findings in right ballpark, not whether they match exact.
• Forget to record timestamps: Timestamps essential for measuring phase durations and adaptation speed. Set as events happen, not retroactive.

See Also

• review-codebase — deep codebase review complements team-level testing
• review-skill-format — validates individual skill format (this skill validates team coordination)
• create-team — creates team definitions that this skill tests
• evolve-team — evolves team definitions based on test findings
• test-a2a-interop — similar testing pattern for A2A protocol conformance
• assess-form — morphic assessment that opaque team lead uses internal