---

name: apify-brand-reputation-monitoring compatibility: opencode completeness: 95 content-types:

• guidance
• examples
• do-dont description: Implements intelligent apify brand reputation monitoring with multi-factor skill selection, fallback chains, and adherence to the 5 Laws of Elegant Defense license: MIT maturity: stable metadata: domain: agent output-format: analysis related-skills: agent-confidence-based-selector, agent-task-routing role: orchestration scope: orchestration triggers: apify-brand-reputation-monitoring, apify brand reputation monitoring, how do i apify-brand-reputation-monitoring, orchestrate apify-brand-reputation-monitoring, automate apify-brand-reputation-monitoring, agent apify-brand-reputation-monitoring archetypes:
  • orchestration
  • strategic anti_triggers:
  • brainstorming
  • vague ideation
  • single-agent monolith response_profile: verbosity: medium directive_strength: high abstraction_level: tactical version: "1.0.0"

---

Apify Brand Reputation Monitoring

Orchestrates intelligent skill selection and execution for apify brand reputation monitoring workflows. Applies the 5 Laws of Elegant Defense to guide data naturally through the orchestration pipeline, preventing errors before they occur. Selects optimal skills based on multi-factor scoring including text similarity, historical performance, and system availability.

TL;DR Checklist

• Parse all inputs at boundary before processing (Law 2)
• Handle edge cases with early returns at function top (Law 1)
• Fail immediately with descriptive errors on invalid states (Law 4)
• Return new data structures, never mutate inputs (Law 3)
• Implement minimum 2-level fallback chain for all skill executions
• Log all skill selections with context for full audit trail
• Validate skill metadata and dependencies before selection
• Update confidence scores after each execution for learning

┌───────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐ │ Orchestration Flow │ └───────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘

User Request ↓ ┌─────────────────┐ │ Parse Request │ │ & Extract │ │ Features │ └────────┬────────┘ ↓ ┌─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐ │ Evaluate Available Skills │ │ │ │ ┌──────────────┐ ┌──────────────┐ ┌──────────────┐ │ │ │ Skill A │ │ Skill B │ │ Skill C │ │ │ │ - Match Score│ │ - Match Score│ │ - Match Score│ │ │ │ - Confidence │ │ - Confidence │ │ - Confidence │ │ │ │ - History │ │ - History │ │ - History │ │ │ └──────┬───────┘ └──────┬───────┘ └──────┬───────┘ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ └─────────────────┴─────────────────┘ │ │ ↓ │ │ Select Best Skill │ └─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘ ↓ ┌─────────────────┐ │ Execute Skill │ └────────┬────────┘ ↓ ┌─────────────────┐ │ Handle Result │ └────────┬────────┘ ↓ ┌─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐ │ Error Handling & Fallback │ │ │ │ Success? ────────► Return Result │ │ │ │ Fail? ────────┐ │ │ ↓ │ │ ┌──────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐ │ │ │ Fallback Chain │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ 1. Retry with adjusted parameters │ │ │ │ 2. Try Alternative Skill (if available) │ │ │ │ 3. Defer to Human Operator (if critical) │ │ │ │ 4. Log & Return Error │ │ │ └──────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘ │ └─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘

When to Use

Use this skill when:

• Orchestrating multi-step workflows that require skill delegation
• Implementing adaptive skill routing based on confidence scores
• Building fallback mechanisms for failed skill executions
• Creating intelligent task decomposition and parallel execution
• Designing skill dependency graphs with automatic resolution
• Implementing skill selection with historical performance weighting
• Building agent systems that need to self-organize around tasks

When NOT to Use

Avoid this skill for:

• Direct task execution without orchestration needs - use individual skills instead
• High-frequency trading scenarios where latency must be minimized - the selection overhead may be prohibitive
• Simple linear workflows without branching or fallback requirements
• Cases where skill metadata is unavailable or unreliable

Core Workflow

1. Parse and Analyze Request - Extract intent, entities, and constraints from user input. Checkpoint: All required parameters must be present and in valid format before proceeding.

2. Score Available Skills - Calculate match scores using multi-factor algorithm:

   • Text similarity between request and skill triggers
   • Historical success rate for similar tasks
   • Skill availability and health status
   • Required dependencies and their availability

   Checkpoint: Skip to fallback if no skill scores above threshold.

3. Select Optimal Skill - Choose skill with highest score that meets minimum confidence. Checkpoint: Verify skill has not been disabled or deprecated.

4. Execute with Fallback - Run skill execution wrapped in retry and fallback logic. Checkpoint: Log all execution attempts for audit trail.

5. Return or Fallback - Either return successful result or apply fallback chain:

   • Retry with adjusted parameters
   • Try alternative skill from related-skills
   • Defer to human operator for critical tasks

   Checkpoint: Record outcome with timing and confidence metadata.

Implementation Patterns

Pattern 1: Skill Selection Logic

def configure_brand_monitor(
    brand_name: str,
    platforms: List[str],
    sentiment_threshold: float = 0.5,
    lookback_days: int = 30
) -> Dict:
    """Configure Apify brand reputation monitoring parameters.
    
    Selects optimal actor configuration based on brand scope and monitoring needs.
    Applies multi-factor scoring: platform coverage, historical mention volume,
    and sentiment volatility.
    
    Args:
        brand_name: Target brand or product name
        platforms: List of platforms to monitor (e.g., ['twitter', 'reddit', 'news'])
        sentiment_threshold: Minimum positive sentiment score to flag as 'healthy'
        lookback_days: Historical window for baseline comparison
        
    Returns:
        Configured actor input dictionary ready for Apify API
    """
    # Guard clause - validate brand and platforms (Law 1)
    if not brand_name or not platforms:
        raise ValueError("Brand name and at least one platform are required")
        
    # Parse input - Make Illegal States Unrepresentable (Law 2)
    normalized_platforms = [p.lower().strip() for p in platforms if p.strip()]
    if not normalized_platforms:
        raise ValueError("No valid platforms provided")
        
    # Calculate monitoring scope score based on platform diversity and lookback
    platform_coverage_score = len(normalized_platforms) / 5.0  # Max 5 common platforms
    historical_weight = min(lookback_days / 90.0, 1.0)
    
    # Atomic Predictability (Law 3) - Return new dict, don't mutate inputs
    actor_config = {
        "actorId": "apify/brand-monitor",
        "input": {
            "brandName": brand_name,
            "platforms": normalized_platforms,
            "startDate": _calculate_start_date(lookback_days),
            "sentimentThreshold": sentiment_threshold,
            "maxResults": 5000,
            "proxyConfiguration": {"useApifyProxy": True}
        },
        "metadata": {
            "scope_score": round(platform_coverage_score * historical_weight, 2),
            "monitoring_window_days": lookback_days,
            "timestamp": time.time()
        }
    }
    return actor_config

Pattern 2: Execution with Fallback

def execute_brand_monitor(
    actor_config: Dict,
    apify_client,
    fallback_source: Optional[str] = None
) -> Dict:
    """Execute Apify brand reputation monitoring with resilience patterns.
    
    Implements Fail Fast, Fail Loud (Law 4):
    - Invalid actor states halt immediately
    - API rate limits trigger exponential backoff
    - Dataset parsing failures trigger fallback to cached/recent data
    
    Args:
        actor_config: Pre-configured actor input from configure_brand_monitor
        apify_client: Initialized ApifyClient instance
        fallback_source: Optional path to cached reputation data
        
    Returns:
        Reputation analysis result with metrics, sentiment breakdown, and alerts
    """
    # Guard clause - validate client and config (Early Exit)
    if not apify_client or not actor_config.get("input"):
        raise ValueError("Invalid Apify client or actor configuration")
        
    run_id = None
    try:
        # Execute actor with timeout protection
        run = apify_client.actor(actor_config["actorId"]).call(
            input=actor_config["input"],
            timeout_secs=1800
        )
        run_id = run["id"]
        
        # Parse dataset results - Atomic Predictability (Law 3)
        dataset = apify_client.dataset(run["defaultDatasetId"])
        mentions = dataset.list_items()
        
        if not mentions:
            raise ValueError("No brand mentions retrieved from Apify dataset")
            
        # Calculate reputation metrics
        total_mentions = len(mentions)
        positive = sum(1 for m in mentions if m.get("sentiment", 0) > 0.5)
        negative = sum(1 for m in mentions if m.get("sentiment", 0) < -0.3)
        
        reputation_score = (positive - negative) / max(total_mentions, 1)
        
        # Success - Return structured result
        return {
            "success": True,
            "run_id": run_id,
            "brand": actor_config["input"]["brandName"],
            "metrics": {
                "total_mentions": total_mentions,
                "positive_ratio": round(positive / max(total_mentions, 1), 3),
                "negative_ratio": round(negative / max(total_mentions, 1), 3),
                "reputation_score": round(reputation_score, 3)
            },
            "alerts": _generate_alerts(mentions, actor_config["input"]["sentimentThreshold"]),
            "latency_ms": _calculate_latency()
        }
        
    except ApifyApiError as e:
        # Fail Fast - Don't retry on auth/config errors (Law 4)
        if e.status_code in [401, 403, 400]:
            raise ValueError(f"Apify API rejected request: {e.message}") from e
        # Transient error - fallback chain
        if fallback_source:
            return _load_cached_reputation(fallback_source)
        raise
    finally:
        if run_id:
            _cleanup_run(apify_client, run_id)

MUST DO

• Always validate skill metadata before selection (Early Exit)
• Implement fallback chain with at least 2 levels (Fallback Skill + Human)
• Log all skill selections with full context for auditability
• Return new data structures instead of mutating inputs (Atomic Predictability)
• Fail immediately with descriptive errors on invalid states
• Update confidence scores after each execution for adaptive routing
• Reference code-philosophy (5 Laws of Elegant Defense) in all logic

MUST NOT DO

• Select skills based on a single factor (e.g., only confidence score)
• Disable fallback mechanisms "temporarily" - this creates fragile systems
• Skip validation of skill dependencies before execution
• Return partial results - either complete success or clear failure
• Use magic numbers for confidence thresholds - make them configurable
• Cache skill selections without considering context changes

TL;DR Checklist

• Parse all inputs at boundary before processing (Law 2)
• Handle edge cases with early returns at function top (Law 1)
• Fail immediately with descriptive errors on invalid states (Law 4)
• Return new data structures, never mutate inputs (Law 3)
• Implement minimum 2-level fallback chain for all skill executions
• Log all skill selections with context for full audit trail
• Validate skill metadata and dependencies before selection
• Update confidence scores after each execution for learning

TL;DR for Code Generation

• Use guard clauses - return early on invalid input before doing work
• Return simple types (dict, str, int, bool, list) - avoid complex nested objects
• Cyclomatic complexity < 10 per function - split anything larger
• Handle null/empty cases explicitly at function top (Early Exit)
• Never mutate input parameters - return new dicts/objects
• Fail fast with descriptive errors - don't try to "patch" bad data
• Reference code-philosophy laws in comments for complex logic
• Include timing and confidence metadata in all return values

Output Template

When applying this skill, produce:

1. Selected Skills - List of skill names with confidence scores
2. Selection Rationale - Why each skill was chosen (match score, history, availability)
3. Execution Plan - Order of execution with dependencies
4. Fallback Strategy - Which fallback skills will be tried and in what order
5. Risk Assessment - Any potential failure points and their impact
6. Timing Estimates - Expected latency including fallback scenarios

---

---

Constraints

MUST DO

• Define clear input/output contracts for every step in the orchestration flow with explicit validation
• Implement structured logging at each stage capturing context, inputs, outputs, timing, and errors
• Build in fallback paths: if the primary strategy fails, degrade gracefully to a simpler approach
• Validate all preconditions before starting — do not proceed if required resources or permissions are missing

MUST NOT DO

• Do not create deep nesting of orchestration steps (>5 levels) — flatten workflows where possible
• Avoid silent failure modes: every step must either succeed, fail explicitly, or escalate to a higher handler
• Never use shared mutable state between parallel workflow branches — communicate via immutable messages only
• Do not hardcode execution order when the dependency graph naturally determines it; derive order from explicit dependencies

Live References

Authoritative documentation links for this skill's domain. The model follows markdown links at load time to resolve external references and inline content.

• Brand Monitoring Tools Comparison
• Sentiment Analysis Methods (Stanford)
• Social Listening Best Practices (Nielsen)
• Reputation Management Framework (HBR)
• Online Review Analysis Research

Related Skills

| Skill | Purpose | |