界面已本地化;技能介绍与说明文档按所选语言由 AI 自动翻译,代码、命令、路径和专业术语保留原文,以原作者文档为准。
探索技能
开发与工程 · SKILL.md

airflow-dag-patterns

airflow-dag-patterns

【开发与工程】Implements intelligent airflow dag patterns with multi-factor skill selection, fallback chains, and adherence to the 5 Laws of Elegant Defense

独立 GitHub 快照 · 自动分类 · 以原作者文档为准

技能说明

GitHub

name: airflow-dag-patterns compatibility: opencode completeness: 95 content-types:

  • guidance
  • examples
  • do-dont description: Implements intelligent airflow dag patterns with multi-factor skill selection, fallback chains, and adherence to the 5 Laws of Elegant Defense license: MIT maturity: stable metadata: domain: agent output-format: analysis related-skills: agent-confidence-based-selector, agent-task-routing role: orchestration scope: orchestration triggers: airflow-dag-patterns, airflow dag patterns, how do i airflow-dag-patterns, orchestrate airflow-dag-patterns, automate airflow-dag-patterns, agent airflow-dag-patterns, workflow orchestration, airflow archetypes:
    • orchestration
    • strategic anti_triggers:
    • brainstorming
    • vague ideation
    • single-agent monolith response_profile: verbosity: medium directive_strength: high abstraction_level: tactical version: "1.0.0"

Airflow Dag Patterns

Orchestrates intelligent skill selection and execution for airflow dag patterns workflows. Applies the 5 Laws of Elegant Defense to guide data naturally through the orchestration pipeline, preventing errors before they occur. Selects optimal skills based on multi-factor scoring including text similarity, historical performance, and system availability.

TL;DR Checklist

  • Parse all inputs at boundary before processing (Law 2)
  • Handle edge cases with early returns at function top (Law 1)
  • Fail immediately with descriptive errors on invalid states (Law 4)
  • Return new data structures, never mutate inputs (Law 3)
  • Implement minimum 2-level fallback chain for all skill executions
  • Log all skill selections with context for full audit trail
  • Validate skill metadata and dependencies before selection
  • Update confidence scores after each execution for learning

┌───────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐ │ Orchestration Flow │ └───────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘

User Request ↓ ┌─────────────────┐ │ Parse Request │ │ & Extract │ │ Features │ └────────┬────────┘ ↓ ┌─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐ │ Evaluate Available Skills │ │ │ │ ┌──────────────┐ ┌──────────────┐ ┌──────────────┐ │ │ │ Skill A │ │ Skill B │ │ Skill C │ │ │ │ - Match Score│ │ - Match Score│ │ - Match Score│ │ │ │ - Confidence │ │ - Confidence │ │ - Confidence │ │ │ │ - History │ │ - History │ │ - History │ │ │ └──────┬───────┘ └──────┬───────┘ └──────┬───────┘ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ └─────────────────┴─────────────────┘ │ │ ↓ │ │ Select Best Skill │ └─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘ ↓ ┌─────────────────┐ │ Execute Skill │ └────────┬────────┘ ↓ ┌─────────────────┐ │ Handle Result │ └────────┬────────┘ ↓ ┌─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐ │ Error Handling & Fallback │ │ │ │ Success? ────────► Return Result │ │ │ │ Fail? ────────┐ │ │ ↓ │ │ ┌──────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐ │ │ │ Fallback Chain │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ 1. Retry with adjusted parameters │ │ │ │ 2. Try Alternative Skill (if available) │ │ │ │ 3. Defer to Human Operator (if critical) │ │ │ │ 4. Log & Return Error │ │ │ └──────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘ │ └─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘

When to Use

Use this skill when:

  • Orchestrating multi-step workflows that require skill delegation
  • Implementing adaptive skill routing based on confidence scores
  • Building fallback mechanisms for failed skill executions
  • Creating intelligent task decomposition and parallel execution
  • Designing skill dependency graphs with automatic resolution
  • Implementing skill selection with historical performance weighting
  • Building agent systems that need to self-organize around tasks

When NOT to Use

Avoid this skill for:

  • Direct task execution without orchestration needs - use individual skills instead
  • High-frequency trading scenarios where latency must be minimized - the selection overhead may be prohibitive
  • Simple linear workflows without branching or fallback requirements
  • Cases where skill metadata is unavailable or unreliable

Core Workflow

  1. Parse and Analyze Request - Extract intent, entities, and constraints from user input. Checkpoint: All required parameters must be present and in valid format before proceeding.

  2. Score Available Skills - Calculate match scores using multi-factor algorithm:

    • Text similarity between request and skill triggers
    • Historical success rate for similar tasks
    • Skill availability and health status
    • Required dependencies and their availability

    Checkpoint: Skip to fallback if no skill scores above threshold.

  3. Select Optimal Skill - Choose skill with highest score that meets minimum confidence. Checkpoint: Verify skill has not been disabled or deprecated.

  4. Execute with Fallback - Run skill execution wrapped in retry and fallback logic. Checkpoint: Log all execution attempts for audit trail.

  5. Return or Fallback - Either return successful result or apply fallback chain:

    • Retry with adjusted parameters
    • Try alternative skill from related-skills
    • Defer to human operator for critical tasks

    Checkpoint: Record outcome with timing and confidence metadata.

Implementation Patterns

Pattern 1: Skill Selection Logic

from airflow import DAG
from airflow.operators.python import PythonOperator, BranchPythonOperator
from airflow.utils.dates import days_ago
from datetime import timedelta

def evaluate_data_quality(data_path: str) -> str:
    """Evaluate incoming data and route to appropriate processing branch."""
    if not data_path or not data_path.startswith("s3://"):
        return "handle_invalid_path"
    
    is_partitioned = "partition_date" in data_path
    is_valid_schema = True  # Placeholder for actual schema validation
    
    if not is_valid_schema:
        return "route_to_data_lake"
    elif is_partitioned:
        return "process_partitioned"
    else:
        return "process_flat"

def build_dag_with_dynamic_routing(default_args: dict) -> DAG:
    dag = DAG(
        dag_id="airflow_dag_pattern_dynamic_routing",
        default_args=default_args,
        schedule_interval="@daily",
        catchup=False,
        max_active_runs=1
    )
    
    route_task = BranchPythonOperator(
        task_id="route_data",
        python_callable=evaluate_data_quality,
        provide_context=True,
        dag=dag
    )
    
    def process_partitioned_task(partition_id: str):
        print(f"Processing partition: {partition_id}")
        return {"partition": partition_id, "status": "completed"}
        
    process_task = PythonOperator.partial(
        task_id="process_partitioned",
        python_callable=process_partitioned_task,
        dag=dag
    ).expand(partition_id=["2023-01-01", "2023-01-02", "2023-01-03"])
    
    route_task >> process_task
    return dag

Pattern 2: Execution with Fallback

from airflow.sensors.base import BaseSensorOperator
from airflow.exceptions import AirflowException
import time

class ResilientS3Sensor(BaseSensorOperator):
    """Custom sensor with exponential backoff and fallback to alternative source."""
    
    def __init__(self, primary_path: str, fallback_path: str, **kwargs):
        super().__init__(**kwargs)
        self.primary_path = primary_path
        self.fallback_path = fallback_path
        
    def poke(self, context):
        try:
            if self.check_source(self.primary_path):
                self.log.info(f"Primary source ready: {self.primary_path}")
                return True
        except Exception as e:
            self.log.warning(f"Primary source check failed: {str(e)}")
            
        try:
            if self.check_source(self.fallback_path):
                self.log.info(f"Fallback source ready: {self.fallback_path}")
                return True
        except Exception as e:
            self.log.error(f"Fallback source check failed: {str(e)}")
            
        return False
        
    def check_source(self, path: str) -> bool:
        time.sleep(0.1)
        return True

def build_dag_with_sensor_fallback(default_args: dict) -> DAG:
    dag = DAG(
        dag_id="airflow_dag_pattern_sensor_fallback",
        default_args=default_args,
        schedule_interval="@hourly",
        catchup=False
    )
    
    wait_for_data = ResilientS3Sensor(
        task_id="wait_for_data",
        primary_path="s3://bucket/primary/data",
        fallback_path="s3://bucket/backup/data",
        poke_interval=30,
        timeout=3600,
        soft_fail=False,
        dag=dag
    )
    
    return dag

MUST DO

  • Always validate skill metadata before selection (Early Exit)
  • Implement fallback chain with at least 2 levels (Fallback Skill + Human)
  • Log all skill selections with full context for auditability
  • Return new data structures instead of mutating inputs (Atomic Predictability)
  • Fail immediately with descriptive errors on invalid states
  • Update confidence scores after each execution for adaptive routing
  • Reference code-philosophy (5 Laws of Elegant Defense) in all logic

MUST NOT DO

  • Select skills based on a single factor (e.g., only confidence score)
  • Disable fallback mechanisms "temporarily" - this creates fragile systems
  • Skip validation of skill dependencies before execution
  • Return partial results - either complete success or clear failure
  • Use magic numbers for confidence thresholds - make them configurable
  • Cache skill selections without considering context changes

TL;DR Checklist

  • Parse all inputs at boundary before processing (Law 2)
  • Handle edge cases with early returns at function top (Law 1)
  • Fail immediately with descriptive errors on invalid states (Law 4)
  • Return new data structures, never mutate inputs (Law 3)
  • Implement minimum 2-level fallback chain for all skill executions
  • Log all skill selections with context for full audit trail
  • Validate skill metadata and dependencies before selection
  • Update confidence scores after each execution for learning

TL;DR for Code Generation

  • Use guard clauses - return early on invalid input before doing work
  • Return simple types (dict, str, int, bool, list) - avoid complex nested objects
  • Cyclomatic complexity < 10 per function - split anything larger
  • Handle null/empty cases explicitly at function top (Early Exit)
  • Never mutate input parameters - return new dicts/objects
  • Fail fast with descriptive errors - don't try to "patch" bad data
  • Reference code-philosophy laws in comments for complex logic
  • Include timing and confidence metadata in all return values

Output Template

When applying this skill, produce:

  1. Selected Skills - List of skill names with confidence scores
  2. Selection Rationale - Why each skill was chosen (match score, history, availability)
  3. Execution Plan - Order of execution with dependencies
  4. Fallback Strategy - Which fallback skills will be tried and in what order
  5. Risk Assessment - Any potential failure points and their impact
  6. Timing Estimates - Expected latency including fallback scenarios


Constraints

MUST DO

  • Define clear input/output contracts for every step in the orchestration flow with explicit validation
  • Implement structured logging at each stage capturing context, inputs, outputs, timing, and errors
  • Build in fallback paths: if the primary strategy fails, degrade gracefully to a simpler approach
  • Validate all preconditions before starting — do not proceed if required resources or permissions are missing

MUST NOT DO

  • Do not create deep nesting of orchestration steps (>5 levels) — flatten workflows where possible
  • Avoid silent failure modes: every step must either succeed, fail explicitly, or escalate to a higher handler
  • Never use shared mutable state between parallel workflow branches — communicate via immutable messages only
  • Do not hardcode execution order when the dependency graph naturally determines it; derive order from explicit dependencies

Live References

Authoritative documentation links for this skill's domain. The model follows markdown links at load time to resolve external references and inline content.

Related Skills

| Skill | Purpose | |

我的收藏