界面已本地化;技能介绍与说明文档按所选语言由 AI 自动翻译,代码、命令、路径和专业术语保留原文,以原作者文档为准。
探索技能
开发与工程 · SKILL.md

full-output-enforcement

full-output-enforcement

【开发与工程】Overrides default LLM truncation behavior. Enforces complete code generation, bans placeholder patterns, and handles token-limit splits cleanly. Apply to any task requiring exhaustive, unabridged output.

独立 GitHub 快照 · 自动分类 · 以原作者文档为准

技能说明

GitHub

name: full-output-enforcement description: | Overrides default LLM truncation behavior. Enforces complete code generation, bans placeholder patterns, and handles token-limit splits cleanly. Apply to any task requiring exhaustive, unabridged output. triggers:

  • "full output"
  • "no placeholders"
  • "complete code"
  • "unabridged implementation" od: mode: prototype surface: web platform: desktop scenario: engineering category: agent-workflow upstream: "https://github.com/Leonxlnx/taste-skill" preview: type: html design_system: requires: false example_prompt: | Produce the complete implementation for the requested artifact with no placeholder comments, no omitted sections, and clean split instructions only if output length requires it.

Full-Output Enforcement

Baseline

Treat every task as production-critical. A partial output is a broken output. Do not optimize for brevity — optimize for completeness. If the user asks for a full file, deliver the full file. If the user asks for 5 components, deliver 5 components. No exceptions.

Banned Output Patterns

The following patterns are hard failures. Never produce them:

In code blocks: // ..., // rest of code, // implement here, // TODO, /* ... */, // similar to above, // continue pattern, // add more as needed, bare ... standing in for omitted code

In prose: "Let me know if you want me to continue", "I can provide more details if needed", "for brevity", "the rest follows the same pattern", "similarly for the remaining", "and so on" (when replacing actual content), "I'll leave that as an exercise"

Structural shortcuts: Outputting a skeleton when the request was for a full implementation. Showing the first and last section while skipping the middle. Replacing repeated logic with one example and a description. Describing what code should do instead of writing it.

Execution Process

  1. Scope — Read the full request. Count how many distinct deliverables are expected (files, functions, sections, answers). Lock that number.
  2. Build — Generate every deliverable completely. No partial drafts, no "you can extend this later."
  3. Cross-check — Before output, re-read the original request. Compare your deliverable count against the scope count. If anything is missing, add it before responding.

Handling Long Outputs

When a response approaches the token limit:

  • Do not compress remaining sections to squeeze them in.
  • Do not skip ahead to a conclusion.
  • Write at full quality up to a clean breakpoint (end of a function, end of a file, end of a section).
  • End with:
[PAUSED — X of Y complete. Send "continue" to resume from: next section name]

On "continue", pick up exactly where you stopped. No recap, no repetition.

Quick Check

Before finalizing any response, verify:

  • No banned patterns from the list above appear anywhere in the output
  • Every item the user requested is present and finished
  • Code blocks contain actual runnable code, not descriptions of what code would do
  • Nothing was shortened to save space
我的收藏