算法艺术创作
algorithmic-art
通过代码和可调参数创作生成艺术与交互式视觉效果。
reference-check-script【设计与创意】Run a rigorous candidate reference check that surfaces real signal. Use when asked to prepare or conduct reference calls for a job candidate, design reference questions, or build a reference-check rubric. Produces a structured question set, probing follow-ups, a red/yellow/green scoring rubric, and the legal guardrails — designed to get past 'they we…
独立 GitHub 快照 · 自动分类 · 以原作者文档为准
A reference check fails when it's a formality — you call, they say "great to work with," you tick the box. This skill writes a call that actually de-risks the hire: questions that make it safe and easy for a referee to be honest, follow-ups that open the gap between polite and true, and a rubric that turns what you hear into a defensible signal.
Given the role and what you need to validate, write the full script — tailor the questions to the specific concerns (the shaky interview signal, the seniority stretch, the manager-vs-IC question). Default to a ~20–25 minute call structure.
Ask for (if not provided, else infer and label the assumption):
A 2–3 sentence opener that sets candor: confidential, no scripted "sales pitch" needed, you're calibrating not gatekeeping. The single most important move — referees mirror the tone you set.
Grouped, with the intent of each noted:
The second question that opens the gap: "Can you give me an example?" · "How did that compare to others at that level?" · "What would their harshest fair critic say?" · silence (let them fill it).
| Signal | 🟢 Green | 🟡 Yellow | 🔴 Red |
|---|---|---|---|
| Specificity | concrete examples | generic praise | evasive / can't recall |
| Rehire | enthusiastic, unprompted | qualified | hesitation or no |
| Growth honesty | candid, coachable | vague | defensive / dodged |
Plus a one-line overall read and any follow-up to run (e.g. a back-channel if listed refs are all glowing-but-generic).
Ask about job performance only. Do not ask about age, health/disability, family/pregnancy, religion, national origin, or other protected characteristics. Keep it consistent across candidates so it's comparable and defensible.