协作头脑风暴
brainstorming
在实现前澄清需求、探索设计选择,并形成清晰的开发方向。
pm-weekly-review【开发与工程】Structure a PM's weekly review and planning session. Use when doing a weekly PM review, writing a weekly update, preparing for Monday planning, or reviewing sprint health. Produces a shareable weekly update covering metrics movement, shipping progress, blockers, insights, and next week's top 3 priorities.
独立 GitHub 快照 · 自动分类 · 以原作者文档为准
Turn the chaotic end-of-week brain dump into a structured 20-minute ritual that keeps you, your team, and your stakeholders aligned — without a meeting.
Not quite this? Use
weekly-review-ritualwhen you want a personal GTD-style weekly review rather than a product review.
5 min — Metrics check: What moved? What didn't? What's surprising? 5 min — Ship progress: What shipped? What slipped? What's blocked? 5 min — Insights: Any customer feedback, support tickets, or research findings? 5 min — Next week priorities: What are the 3 things that matter most?
Product Area: [What you own] Written by: [PM Name] Time to read: ~3 minutes
| Metric | This Week | Last Week | Target | Trend |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| [Primary metric] | [Value] | [Value] | [Target] | ↑ / ↓ / → |
| [Secondary metric] | [Value] | [Value] | [Target] | ↑ / ↓ / → |
| [Health metric] | [Value] | [Value] | [Target] | ↑ / ↓ / → |
Notable movement:
Concern to watch:
Shipped:
In Progress:
Slipped / Blocked:
Carry-forward to next week:
Customer feedback:
Support signals:
Research / data:
| # | Priority | Why This Week | Owner | Done = |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | [Most important thing] | [Reason it can't wait] | [Name] | [Clear definition of done] |
| 2 | [Second priority] | [Why] | [Name] | [Done criteria] |
| 3 | [Third priority] | [Why] | [Name] | [Done criteria] |
Decisions needed:
Asks / dependencies:
What's one thing from this week I'd do differently? [Your honest answer — 1–2 sentences]
What's the biggest unknown I'm carrying into next week? [Name the uncertainty explicitly]
Work from what is given. If any of these is missing, still produce the complete output: fill each gap with a reasonable assumption marked (assumed, confirm) and list those assumptions at the end. Ask a question first only when the core subject itself is missing (there is nothing to write about).