---

name: figma-design-brief description: "Write a structured design brief for a Figma design task from a product requirement or feature request. Use when asked to write a design brief, create a design spec for Figma, turn a PRD into design requirements, or brief a designer on what to build in Figma. Produces a brief with goals, scope, user flows, components needed, constraints, and success criteria."

Figma Design Brief Skill

Converts a product requirement or feature request into a structured design brief — everything a designer needs to open Figma and start building confidently.

Not quite this? Use figma-design-qa when the design already exists and you are checking it against the spec.

Required Inputs

• Feature or requirement (paste PRD snippet, ticket, or describe the feature)
• User goal (what is the user trying to accomplish?)
• Platform (iOS / Android / Web / Responsive / All)
• Existing components available (optional)
• Timeline (when does design need to be ready?)

Programmatic Helper

Contrast ratios cannot be eyeballed. The AA line sits at 4.5:1, and #777777 on white is 4.478 (fails) while #767676 is 4.54 (passes) — no amount of looking at a screenshot separates those. Compute them:

npx --yes notugly fix "#8ab4f8" "#ffffff"     # ratio, APCA, and the nearest passing colour
npx --yes notugly onepager <url> --out review.html   # every pairing, printable
npx --yes notugly vision                      # which colours merge for colour-blind viewers

notugly fix returns the ratio, the APCA lightness contrast, and the closest colour to the one already chosen that passes — same hue, same chroma. Paste those numbers into the tables below rather than estimating them.

Deterministic, zero dependencies, and no model call — so it costs nothing to run and gives the same answer every time.

If the brief specifies colours, state the measured ratio for each intended text/background pairing. A brief that specifies an unreachable pairing wastes a design cycle before anybody notices.

Output Structure

1. Brief Header

Feature, PM, Designer, Platform, Design due, Dev handoff dates.

2. What We Are Designing and Why

• The goal: [One sentence — user problem being solved]
• Context: [2-3 sentences. Why now? What triggers this?]
• Success looks like: [Specific observable outcome]

3. User Flows to Design

Flow N: [Flow name]

• Entry point: [Where user starts]
• Steps: [Numbered key steps]
• Exit point: [Where flow ends]
• Edge cases: [empty state, error state, loading state]

4. Screens Required

Screen	New / Update	Notes
[Screen]	New	[Key requirement]

5. Components Needed

Component	In library?	Action
[Component]	Yes/No/Needs variant	Use/Create/Extend

6. Constraints and Requirements

• Must haves: [Non-negotiable constraints]
• Must avoid: [Design patterns to not use]
• Accessibility: [WCAG level, touch target sizes]

7. Open Questions

• [Question — with owner]

Quality Checks

• Goal is outcome-focused (not "design the feature")
• All flows include edge cases
• Components table identifies create vs reuse
• Constraints include accessibility requirements
• Open questions have owners

Anti-Patterns

• Do not write a design brief that describes the solution — the brief must describe the problem and constraints, not the design answer
• Do not skip the success criteria — designers need to know what "done" looks like before starting
• Do not omit existing components to reuse — briefs that ignore the design system lead to inconsistent implementations
• Do not leave open questions unresolved — escalate them before design work starts, not during it
• Do not confuse requirements with design instructions — the brief defines what, not how

Example Trigger Phrases

• "Write a design brief for [feature]"
• "Turn this PRD into a Figma design brief"
• "Brief the designer on what to build for [requirement]"
• "Create a design spec for [feature] for Figma"
• "What does the designer need to know to design [feature]?"