算法艺术创作
algorithmic-art
通过代码和可调参数创作生成艺术与交互式视觉效果。
58-positioning-global【设计与创意】Use when positioning needs defining or sharpening — a statement built on Promise, Proof, and Path, a differentiation matrix against competitors, category entry points, a three-level message hierarchy, and tagline directions. Trigger on 'positioning', 'positioning statement', 'what makes us different', 'USP', 'why should customers choose us over them'…
独立 GitHub 快照 · 自动分类 · 以原作者文档为准
name: 58-positioning-global
description: "Use when positioning needs defining or sharpening — a statement built on Promise, Proof, and Path, a differentiation matrix against competitors, category entry points, a three-level message hierarchy, and tagline directions. Trigger on 'positioning', 'positioning statement', 'what makes us different', 'USP', 'why should customers choose us over them', 'we sound the same as everyone else'. Also use when the user can list features but not a reason to pick them. Not for — competitor teardown research, see 08-competitor-research-global; how the brand sounds in writing, see 35-brand-voice-global; the offer and its value stack, see 31-offer-design-global; the launch built on it, see 59-go-to-market-global."
metadata:
version: 1.0.1
category: strategy
license: MIT
triggers:
Positioning is not a pretty tagline. It is an explicit decision: who you serve, what you solve, and who you beat. Sharp positioning gives content an angle, ads a hook, and the team one story. Vague positioning makes everything generic. Run
08-competitor-research-globaland09-customer-insight-globalfirst if you do not yet have competitor data and customer insight.
Read .agents/product-marketing-context-global.md and the Brand Hub if available. If missing, ask up to 4 questions:
Six common directions — choose the one your real strengths can defend:
| Strategy | Description | Example message direction |
|---|---|---|
| By attribute | Lead on one distinctive property | "The only CRM built for field service teams" |
| By price and quality | Premium, or value-for-money | "Agency-grade creative at in-house cost" |
| By use case | Own a specific situation | "Built for teams shipping weekly, not quarterly" |
| By user | Aim at one narrow buyer | "For solo founders doing their own marketing" |
| By category | Category creator or leader | "The first compliance layer for AI agents" |
| Against a competitor | Define yourself by contrast | "Not another course. A working system." |
Define your category: narrow enough to win, wide enough to have a market.
Two layers, use both:
Layer 1 — Full statement (internal, used in every brief):
For [target audience] — people who [specific pain or desire],
[brand/product] is the [category]
that helps them [core outcome],
unlike [competitor or alternative], because [real differentiator].
Layer 2 — Promise + Proof + Path (for content, sales, and landing pages):
| Component | Question | Example (DTC skincare) |
|---|---|---|
| Promise | What do you commit to, based on real customer insight? | "Know exactly what your skin needs before you spend on the wrong products" — not "effective skincare" |
| Proof | What evidence shows the promise is real? | Verified before/after photos, dermatologist review, third-party ingredient testing, published pricing with no hidden fees |
| Path | What steps does the buyer walk to get the promise? | 1. Free skin quiz > 2. Personal routine > 3. Follow the routine > 4. Reassess at 8 weeks |
The Promise fails if it is generic. The Path fails if the buyer cannot picture the next step.
Pull data from 08-competitor-research-global:
| Competitor / Alternative | Their positioning | Strengths | Weaknesses | How you differ (with proof) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Competitor A | ||||
| Competitor B | ||||
| Alternative (DIY or do nothing) |
Then lock 3 real differentiators — each a Claim plus its Proof:
| # | Claim | Proof / reason to believe |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | ||
| 2 | ||
| 3 |
Primary differentiator: one sentence. This is what every piece of content and every ad will reflect.
Market gap (what nobody does well yet): write it down explicitly so you can take it.
Category entry points are the situations that make a buyer think of the category and start looking. Strong positioning means being remembered first in those moments.
| Trigger situation | What the buyer is thinking or searching | How you want to be remembered | Content / channel that serves it |
|---|---|---|---|
| [e.g. breakout two weeks before a wedding] | [needs a fast fix, afraid of being scammed] | [transparent, diagnosis before selling] | [short-form diagnostic video, search] |
| [e.g. month-end and still no idea if we are profitable] | |||
| [e.g. current vendor raised prices or missed a deadline] |
Pick 2-3 priority entry points and map them to awareness stages: unaware (educate — name the problem) > problem-aware but not motivated (agitate) > solution-aware but undecided (compare — differentiate) > ready (close — offer).
| Level | Where it is used | Content |
|---|---|---|
| Level 1 — Core message | Headline, ad hook | Shortest possible: biggest benefit, clearest audience |
| Level 2 — Supporting messages | Body copy, landing page | 2A proof/social proof · 2B differentiation · 2C objection handling |
| Level 3 — Proof points | Testimonials, case studies | Specific numbers, real customer quotes, outcomes achieved |
Tagline directions: 3-5 options, each 5-8 words, anchored on the primary differentiator or the promise. Note which direction to test — the final tagline is chosen after message testing with real buyers, not in a meeting room.
File name: positioning-[product-name]-[YYYYMMDD].md
# Positioning — [Brand / product]
## 1. Positioning statement
- Full statement: "For... is the... that helps... unlike... because..."
- Promise: | Proof: | Path (steps):
## 2. Target segmentation
| Segment | Description | Main pain | Main desire | Priority |
| Primary / Secondary / Tertiary |
- Who this is NOT for:
## 3. Differentiation matrix
| Competitor | Their positioning | Strengths | Weaknesses | How you differ |
- 3 differentiators (Claim + Proof):
- Primary differentiator (one sentence):
- Market gap:
## 4. Category entry points
| Trigger situation | What they think | How you want to be remembered | Content / channel |
## 5. Message hierarchy
- Level 1 core message:
- Level 2 supporting (proof / differentiation / objection):
- Level 3 proof points:
## 6. Tagline directions
| # | Option (5-8 words) | Anchored on which differentiator | Test note |
## 7. Positioning map
[Two axes fitting the category — your position vs competitors — open space]
## 8. Rollout plan
| Where applied | What to update | Owner | Deadline |
| Ads / Landing page / Content pillars / Sales script / Brand Hub |
Pick two axes that fit the category (price x perceived quality; specialist x approachable; premium x mass; trust x entertainment). Read the map: crowded corners are brutal auctions; empty corners are open space you can take — but verify real demand exists there before jumping in.
08-competitor-research-global: run first — supplies the competitive landscape for step 3.09-customer-insight-global: run first — pain, desire, and triggers are the raw material for the Promise and entry points.31-offer-design-global: run after — offer architecture must align with positioning (do not position premium then discount everywhere).59-go-to-market-global: uses the positioning statement as the source message for the GTM plan.02-campaign-brief-global: the core message in the brief comes from message hierarchy Level 1.