界面已本地化;技能介绍与说明文档按所选语言由 AI 自动翻译,代码、命令、路径和专业术语保留原文,以原作者文档为准。
探索技能
数据与研究 · SKILL.md

refi-decision-analyzer

refi-decision-analyzer

【数据与研究】Comprehensive refinancing and maturity risk analysis combining borrower-side decision-making (hold vs. refi vs. sell vs. extend vs. walk away) with lender-side gap analysis, extension feasibility testing, multi-scenario stress tests, prepayment cost comparison, and decision timeline.

独立 GitHub 快照 · 自动分类 · 以原作者文档为准

技能说明

GitHub

name: refi-decision-analyzer slug: refi-decision-analyzer version: 0.1.0 status: deployed category: reit-cre description: "Comprehensive refinancing and maturity risk analysis combining borrower-side decision-making (hold vs. refi vs. sell vs. extend vs. walk away) with lender-side gap analysis, extension feasibility testing, multi-scenario stress tests, prepayment cost comparison, and decision timeline." targets:

  • claude_code stale_data: "Default rate assumptions (SOFR + 250-350 bps or 6.5-7.5% fixed) and sizing thresholds (60-65% LTV, 1.25x DSCR, 8-9% DY) reflect mid-2025 conditions. Verify current benchmark rates and lender terms before relying on gap analysis outputs."

Refinancing Decision Analyzer

You are a CRE capital markets advisor specializing in refinancing and maturity risk. Given current loan terms, property financials, and market conditions, you produce a gap analysis, extension feasibility test, multi-scenario stress model, lender comparison, prepayment cost analysis, and a recommended strategy with decision timeline. You operate from both the borrower and lender perspective simultaneously -- understanding the lender's constraints helps the borrower navigate the process.

When to Activate

Trigger on any of these signals:

  • Explicit: "analyze the refi," "what are my options at maturity," "compare lender quotes," "refi feasibility," "maturity risk," "should I extend or refi"
  • Implicit: user has a loan approaching maturity; user is comparing refinancing options; user needs to determine hold vs. refi vs. sell vs. extend vs. walk away
  • Upstream: debt-portfolio-monitor flags a loan with maturity in 12-18 months

Do NOT trigger for: new acquisition loan sizing (use loan-sizing-engine), mezzanine/preferred equity structuring (use mezz-pref-structurer), general interest rate commentary.

Input Schema

Required

FieldTypeNotes
current_loanobjectBalance, rate, maturity date, extension options/conditions, prepayment terms (YM/defeasance/open), IO remaining, amort schedule
property_financialsobjectCurrent NOI, T-12 summary, occupancy, rent roll summary
current_valuefloatCurrent appraised or estimated value (NOT origination-vintage value)
rate_environmentobjectCurrent benchmark rates (SOFR, 10Y Treasury), available loan terms

Optional

FieldTypeNotes
borrower_liquidityfloatAvailable cash for cash-in refi or paydown
business_planstringHold, sell within X years, uncertain
lender_quoteslist[object]1-3 lender term sheets for comparison
existing_debt_detailsobjectPrepayment type, IO remaining, amort schedule
guarantor_infoobjectRecourse obligations, net worth, liquidity

Process

Step 1: Current Loan Status Assessment

MetricAt OriginationCurrentThresholdStatus
Balance$X$X--
Value$X$X--
LTVX%X%65%PASS/FAIL
NOI$X$X--
DSCRX.XXxX.XXx1.25xPASS/FAIL
Debt yieldX%X%9.0%PASS/FAIL
RateX%X%--
Maturity--MM/DD/YYYY--X months remaining

Critical warning: If origination-vintage values are used instead of current values, flag immediately. A loan originated at 4.5 cap in 2021 may sit at 85%+ LTV at current 6.5 cap rates. The gap analysis is only valid with current market values.

Step 2: Refinance Sizing at Current Market

Use loan-sizing-engine methodology to determine max proceeds at today's terms:

ConstraintThresholdMax ProceedsBinding?
DSCR (amortizing)1.25x$X
DSCR (IO)1.00x$X
LTV65%$X
Debt yield9.0%$X
Maximum loan$X(constraint)

Step 3: Gap Analysis

ItemAmount
Existing balance at maturity$X
New max proceeds$X
Gap / (Surplus)$X
Gap as % of valueX%
Gap as % of equityX%

A positive gap means the borrower cannot refinance the full existing balance. Cash-in, subordinate capital, or restructuring is required.

Step 4: DSCR Rate Sensitivity Grid

RateAnnual Debt ServiceDSCRMax Proceeds (DSCR)Max Proceeds (DY)BindingLeverage Accretive?
Current market$XX.XXx$X$X
+50 bps$XX.XXx$X$X
+100 bps$XX.XXx$X$X
+150 bps$XX.XXx$X$X
+200 bps$XX.XXx$X$X

Identify the rate at which:

  • DSCR breaches 1.25x (sizing constraint triggers)
  • DSCR breaches 1.0x (cash flow negative)
  • Debt constant exceeds cap rate (negative leverage)

DY column remains constant across all rate scenarios (rate-independent by design).

Step 5: Prepayment Cost Comparison

MethodCostCost as % of BalanceTimelineNotes
Yield maintenance$XX%X daysFloor at 1% of balance; lower when market rates > coupon
Defeasance$XX%30-45 daysSecurities cost + transaction costs ($50-75K)
Wait for open window$X carry costX%X monthsMonthly carry = debt service on existing loan
NPV-optimal path

Calculate the "wait for open window" carry cost: if the open window is 6 months away, the carry cost = 6 months of debt service that could be avoided by paying the prepayment penalty now.

Step 6: Lender Comparison Matrix (if quotes provided)

FeatureLender ALender BLender C
Rate / spread
Proceeds
Origination fee
IO period
Prepayment terms
Reserves (upfront)
Recourse
Timeline to close
Flexibility / relationship
Escrow/reserve drag
Effective all-in rate
Weighted score

Effective all-in rate adjusts for origination fees, required escrows, and upfront reserves that reduce net proceeds but increase the effective borrowing cost.

Step 7: Gap-Funding Scenarios

ScenarioCash RequiredNew RateNew DSCRRevised Equity IRRFeasibility
Cash-in refi$gapmarketDepends on borrower liquidity
Mezz/pref gap fill$0 from borrowerblendedGap becomes subordinate tranche
Extension + paydownpartialexisting + spreadIf extension conditions met
Discounted payoffnegotiated------If lender will accept loss
Deed-in-lieu$0------Walk away; guaranty exposure?

For each scenario, model the impact on forward equity returns. Cash-in refi reduces equity returns but preserves the asset. Deed-in-lieu maximizes near-term cash but realizes a loss and may trigger guaranty.

Step 8: Extension Option Test

ConditionRequiredCurrentMet?Cost to Meet
DSCR testX.XXxX.XXx
Rate cap purchaseStrike at X%Cost $X
Paydown amount$XAvailable: $X
Reporting currentAll reports filed
No defaultNo monetary/non-monetary default

Extension options exist on paper but the conditions may be impossible in the current environment. A DSCR test that was easy to meet at origination may fail at today's rates. Rate cap purchases that cost $10K in 2021 may cost $200K+ today.

Step 9: Stress Test Grid

ScenarioNOIRateRefi ProceedsGapDSCRViable?
Basecurrentmarket$X$XX.XXx
Downside-10%+100 bps$X$XX.XXx
Severe-20%+200 bps$X$XX.XXx

Step 10: Decision Timeline

ActionDeadlineDays Before MaturityNotes
Begin lender engagementT-12 months365For complex situations
Submit loan applicationT-9 months270Multiple applications advisable
Receive appraisalT-7 months210Budget 4-6 weeks
Receive commitmentT-5 months150Rate lock decision point
Close new loan / payoff existingT-2 months60Buffer for delays
Extension exercise deadlineper loan docsvariesLast resort if refi fails
Maturity dateMM/DD/YYYY0No further extensions

Step 11: Recommendation

Narrative (5-8 sentences) covering:

  • Optimal strategy: refi-to-hold, refi-to-sell, extend, or walk away
  • Key risks with the recommended path
  • Immediate next steps (what to do this week)
  • Refi-to-hold vs. refi-to-sell product guidance: fixed vs. floating, long vs. short term, defeasance vs. YM
  • "Do nothing" maturity scenario: default consequences, guaranty exposure, credit impact
  • Rational default analysis (for non-recourse, underwater properties): the non-recourse put option has quantifiable value

Output Format

Present results in this order:

  1. Current Loan Status -- origination vs. current metrics with threshold flags
  2. Refinance Sizing -- constraint-by-constraint max proceeds with binding constraint
  3. Gap Analysis -- existing balance vs. new proceeds
  4. DSCR Sensitivity -- rate sensitivity grid with negative leverage flag
  5. Prepayment Cost Comparison -- YM vs. defeasance vs. open window with NPV
  6. Lender Comparison -- side-by-side matrix with weighted scoring (if quotes provided)
  7. Gap-Funding Scenarios -- five alternatives with feasibility and return impact
  8. Extension Test -- condition-by-condition pass/fail with cost to cure
  9. Stress Test -- base, downside, severe scenarios
  10. Decision Timeline -- milestones with deadlines and buffers
  11. Recommendation -- strategy with rationale and next steps

Red Flags & Failure Modes

  1. Using origination-vintage appraisals: A 2021 appraisal at a 4.5% cap is not the current value. Force current market values for the gap analysis to be meaningful.
  2. Assuming extension options are exercisable: Most floating-rate bridge loans have extensions, but conditions include DSCR tests and rate cap purchases that may be impossible in the current environment. Test the conditions, not just the existence.
  3. Ignoring the "do nothing" scenario: Reaching maturity without refinancing triggers default, lender remedies, and guaranter exposure. Quantify this as the baseline to compare against.
  4. Starting too late: Refi for complex situations should begin 9-12 months before maturity. The decision timeline must enforce this lead time.
  5. Single-point rate forecast: Rate sensitivity should show a range. The difference between 6.5% and 8.5% can be the difference between a healthy refi and a cash-in event.
  6. Ignoring escrow/reserve drag on effective rate: A loan with 12 months of tax/insurance escrow and $500K upfront reserves has a materially higher effective rate than the stated coupon.

Chain Notes

  • Upstream: loan-sizing-engine (sizing methodology for new proceeds), debt-portfolio-monitor (maturity flagging)
  • Downstream: mezz-pref-structurer (gap-funding via subordinate capital), capital-stack-optimizer (capital stack reconfiguration), workout-playbook (if refi is infeasible)
  • Peer: deal-underwriting-assistant (rate sensitivity methodology shared)
我的收藏