技能创建器
skill-creator
创建、改进和评估自定义技能,把专业流程转化为可重复使用的 AI 能力。
light-citation【数据与研究】Verify scholarly references and claim-citation support for Light stage 10. Use when auditing a manuscript, claim map, bibliography, DOI/arXiv/PMID/ISBN/URL, BibTeX/CSL, citekeys, chimeric or fabricated citations, retraction/correction alerts, or preparing a canonical citation registry for typesetting. Builds provenance-preserving inventories, confirm…
独立 GitHub 快照 · 自动分类 · 以原作者文档为准
Make every author-used reference traceable, real, correctly identified, and honestly connected to the claim it is supposed to support. Treat formatting, metadata existence, publication-integrity facts, and semantic support as four different questions.
Read citation-resource-map.md before a full
manuscript audit. Read
references/registry_contract.md before
producing or consuming the canonical registry. Read
references/locator_audit.md before judging
claim support.
light.paper_claims.v1, exact claim/source locators,
current claim text hashes, reviewer-bound citation-support hashes,
manuscript, figures/tables, supplement, and reference candidates.light.citation_registry.v1, BibTeX, CSL JSON, source-level evidence,
failure records, claim-edge review, citekey audit, and
light.findings.v1(producer=citation).citation_verify: confirmed missing works
and chimeric citations. Metadata conflicts, unavailable sources, claim
relevance, formatting, and publication-update alerts are warn/skip.ROUTES has no key 10; never invent a
back-edge.references.bib, citekey-audit.json, registry and delivery.json to
typesetting. Typesetting compiles and checks keys; it does not re-decide
authenticity. delivery.json must declare status and per-deliverable
sha256: hashes so typesetting can reject stale or edited handoffs.CONFIRMED-MISSING only when DOI Registration Agency explicitly
reports non-existence and Crossref plus DataCite both return 404/410.CONFIRMED only when registration metadata and at least one
independent field source confirm the work. Otherwise retain
UNAVAILABLE or UNRESOLVED.updated-by; the notice carries inverse update-to.SUPPORTS requires a locator-backed semantic review.Use the claim map, manuscript, figures/tables and supplement together:
python scripts/citation_registry.py \
--claim-map claim_plan.json \
--draft paper.tex \
--figure figure_notes.md \
--supplement supplement.md \
--refs-spec citation_input.json \
--out-dir citation-delivery
Preserve claim_id, exact claim, claim locator, artifact path, occurrence
locator, citekey and raw identifier. Use
templates/citation_input.json when the
project has no reference spec.
Normalize DOI, arXiv, PMID, ISBN and URL. Deduplicate exact works. Keep arXiv, accepted manuscript, versioned dataset and published DOI as explicit versions under one work only when the inputs establish the relationship. If not established, keep them separate and mark the relationship unresolved.
python scripts/verify_refs.py \
--spec citation_input.json \
--self-author Smith \
--out verify.json
Use Crossref or DataCite as the registration source. Use PubMed, Semantic
Scholar, or configured OpenAlex as the independent field source. Keep each
endpoint, HTTP status, outcome, timestamp and returned fields in
source_evidence,并保存实际参与判定的 normalized-field SHA-256。Crossref polite-pool
email、OpenAlex/Semantic Scholar key 只用于请求,绝不写入 endpoint、registry 或日志。
Interpret status exactly:
| Status | Meaning | Action |
|---|---|---|
CONFIRMED | registration source + independent field source | eligible for canonical BibTeX/CSL |
CONFIRMED-MISSING | DOI RA explicit non-existence + Crossref/DataCite 404 | critical; replace or delete |
UNAVAILABLE | transport/rate/auth/5xx prevents lookup | retry or use another free source |
UNRESOLVED | partial evidence or second source incomplete | investigate; do not call verified |
Compare the author's cited title, authors and year against registration
metadata. Inspect field_conflicts source by source. Keep the user's raw
citation unchanged until a human resolves the conflict.
Treat these as chimeric critical:
Treat a single title translation, subtitle, year-online/year-print difference, author omission or ordering issue as metadata warning unless corroborating evidence establishes a chimera.
Inspect publication_updates. Confirm relation direction with both the
affected work and notice DOI when the alert matters. Record type, notice DOI,
source and direction. Send those facts to research-ethics; do not label a
correction notice itself retracted because it has update-to.
Use
templates/claim_citation_review.json
and the original full text:
supports: the cited locator supports the claim as written;partial: only a narrower statement is supported;related_only: same topic, but not evidence for this proposition;unsupported: the source contradicts or does not support it;review_required: full text/locator/reviewer is missing.Each review must record access, a real non-placeholder source_locator,
source_evidence_sha256, reviewer, an already-occurred ISO reviewed_at, and
reviewed_claim_sha256 for the exact claim text that was reviewed. The registry
also emits the current claim_text_sha256; the two hashes must match, otherwise
the review is stale and is downgraded to REVIEW_REQUIRED. SUPPORTS without
those fields, with a future reviewed_at, with a template/absolute/escaping
locator, or with a mismatched claim hash is downgraded to REVIEW_REQUIRED by
the registry/gate; metadata-only access can never support a claim. If access is only ABSTRACT_ONLY, SUPPORTS also requires
support_scope=ABSTRACT_EXPLICIT or abstract_claim_explicit=true; otherwise
the registry/gate downgrades it to REVIEW_REQUIRED. Check direction,
population, intervention, comparator, metric, time, modality, causal strength
and scope. Change the claim or citation when related-only or unsupported. Do
not promote an abstract-level heuristic to final support.
Normalize the four gates explicitly before delivery:
python scripts/citation_four_gate.py \
--registry citation-delivery/citation-registry.json --as-of 2026-07-05
# 或仅调试模板合约:
python scripts/citation_four_gate.py \
--input templates/citation-four-gate.example.json --as-of 2026-07-05
The public template is intentionally UNKNOWN and must exit 1. A later gate
can never repair an earlier failure: existence → identity → directed
publication status → locator-backed claim support. Prefer --registry so the
four-gate records are derived from the canonical registry rather than a hand
copied template. ABSTRACT_ONLY may be
direct only when the declared claim is explicitly present in the abstract;
metadata alone never supports a claim. Retracted work may document historical
record but cannot silently support a current conclusion.
Run the registry online after inputs are complete:
python scripts/citation_registry.py \
--claim-map claim_plan.json --draft paper.tex \
--refs-spec citation_input.json --online \
--out-dir citation-delivery
python scripts/citekey_audit.py \
--tex paper.tex --bib citation-delivery/references.bib --json
Only confirmed, non-chimeric works enter generated BibTeX/CSL. Preserve every
failure and unresolved review in separate artifacts. The generated
delivery.json is DELIVERED only when citation-failures.json and
claim-citation-review.json are empty and the citekey audit is OK; otherwise
it exposes ERROR or REVIEW_REQUIRED. Use doi_to_any.py for one-off DOI
content negotiation and formatting, not as proof of semantic support.
python scripts/citation_verify_gate.py \
--registry citation-delivery/citation-registry.json \
--tex paper.tex --bib citation-delivery/references.bib \
--report citation_findings.json
python ../light-orchestrator/scripts/run_checkpoint.py \
--file .light/passport.yaml --stage 10 \
--findings citation_findings.json --write --ts <ISO-8601>
Expect citation_verify_gate.py to return exit 1 on a critical finding.
Repair the registry root cause, rebuild all derived artifacts, rerun the gate,
then rerun the same stage-10 checkpoint. Deliver only after the checkpoint
passes and passport records delivered.
| Script | Responsibility |
|---|---|
citation_registry.py | inventory, normalization, version grouping, verification orchestration, claim edges, registry/BibTeX/CSL/evidence/failure/delivery |
verify_refs.py | authoritative multi-source fields, honest status machine, source evidence, conflicts, chimeras, Crossref update direction |
citation_verify_gate.py | stage-10 findings producer; exit 1 on confirmed missing/chimeric |
citekey_audit.py | manuscript ↔ .bib key audit; reused by typesetting |
doi_to_any.py | DOI content negotiation and citation-format output |
verify_citation_edge.py | paper A→B open-index relation; never claim support |
citation_four_gate.py | ordered existence/identity/update/support contract with purpose-aware retraction handling; can derive records directly from light.citation_registry.v1 |
citation-resource-map.md: executable order and resource tiers.references/registry_contract.md: machine artifact semantics.references/locator_audit.md: human semantic-support protocol.references.md: API/style/reference-manager details; load only the relevant
section.templates/*: author input and review contracts.assets/citation_checklist.md: final human checklist.docs/competitors/citation.md: R1 evidence and comparative claims, not an
execution guide.updated-by direction is correct; notices are not inverted.SUPPORTS edge has source evidence SHA-256, reviewer,
non-future reviewed_at, matching claim_text_sha256/reviewed_claim_sha256
and non-metadata access, with no template/absolute/escaping locator.--registry unless there is a documented reason to use a hand-written fixture.delivery.json records status plus sha256: hashes for every
deliverable consumed by typesetting.