---

name: ui-visual-validator description: "CI/CD visual regression setup and pre-commit visual verification checklist. Scoped complement to reality-checker agent — adds: visual regression tool ecosystem (Chromatic, Percy, Applitools, BackstopJS, Playwright Visual), 13-item mandatory verification checklist, and GitHub Actions screenshot diff pipelines. Use when setting up automated visual regression tests in CI/CD or running systematic pre-PR visual verification beyond what reality-checker provides." risk: low source: community (adapted for workspace) date_added: "2026-02-27" updated: "2026-03-15" allowed-tools: Read, Bash metadata: triggers: visual regression, screenshot testing, visual diff, Chromatic, Percy, Applitools, BackstopJS, Playwright visual, visual testing CI, pixel diff, visual QA, UI looks wrong, before and after screenshot related-skills: browser-testing, accessibility-audit, web-design-guidelines, design-system domain: quality role: specialist scope: review output-format: report last-reviewed: "2026-03-15"

Iron Law

DO NOT REPLACE reality-checker — USE IT FIRST for live browser screenshots and binary APPROVED/NEEDS WORK verdict. This skill adds: (1) visual regression tooling setup for CI/CD pipelines, (2) the 13-item mandatory verification checklist for systematic pre-PR checks, (3) automated screenshot diff configuration. Use both together.

UI Visual Validator

Systematic visual verification methodology + CI/CD visual regression tooling. Skeptic-first: the modification goal has NOT been achieved until proven with visual evidence.

Scope vs reality-checker

Capability	reality-checker agent	ui-visual-validator (this skill)
Live browser screenshot	✅ Chrome DevTools MCP	❌ (use reality-checker for this)
Binary APPROVED/NEEDS WORK verdict	✅	❌ (defer to reality-checker)
Visual regression tool setup (CI/CD)	❌	✅ Chromatic, Percy, Applitools, BackstopJS
GitHub Actions visual diff workflow	❌	✅
13-item mandatory verification checklist	❌	✅
Accessibility visual compliance checklist	❌	✅
Pre-commit systematic analysis protocol	❌	✅

Workflow: Run ui-visual-validator checklist → gather screenshots → pass to reality-checker for final verdict.

When to Use This Skill

• Setting up Chromatic, Percy, or Playwright Visual in a CI/CD pipeline
• Before a PR that touches Angular components or Flutter screens — run through the 13-item checklist
• Investigating "it looks different on CI than locally" — visual regression diagnosis
• New Angular component needs visual baseline established for regression testing
• Flutter screen needs screenshot test added to CI

When NOT to Use This Skill

• For live browser screenshots — use browser-testing skill + Chrome DevTools MCP
• For the final APPROVED/NEEDS WORK gate — use reality-checker agent
• For WCAG compliance audit — use accessibility-audit skill

---

Core Principle

The modification goal has NOT been achieved until proven by visual evidence. Ignore code hints. Base judgments solely on visual output.

Forbidden behaviors:

• Assuming code changes automatically produce correct visual results
• Quick conclusions without systematic analysis
• Accepting "looks different" as "looks correct"
• Using expectation to replace direct observation

Required output format (when performing visual analysis): Always start with: "From the visual evidence, I observe..."

---

13-Item Mandatory Verification Checklist

Run through ALL 13 items before declaring a UI change complete:

Structural

• 1. Objective description — Described actual visual content without assumptions?
• 2. Goal verification — Compared each element against stated modification goals systematically?
• 3. Measurement validation — For rotation/position/size changes: verified through actual visual measurement (not assumed from code)?

Visual Quality

• 4. Responsive breakpoints — Verified at 375px, 768px, 1024px, 1440px?
• 5. Dark/light mode — Both themes validated (if applicable)?
• 6. Loading and transition states — Skeleton/spinner shown correctly? Transitions smooth?
• 7. Error and edge cases — Empty states, error states, disabled states all verified?

Accessibility (Visual)

• 8. Color contrast — WCAG 4.5:1 minimum for normal text verified visually?
• 9. Focus indicators — Visible focus rings on interactive elements?
• 10. Touch targets — Interactive elements >= 44px (Angular) / 48dp (Flutter)?

Design System

• 11. Token compliance — No hardcoded colors visible that should use semantic tokens?
• 12. Design system alignment — Component matches design system spec?

Regression

• 13. Reverse validation — Actively looked for evidence the modification FAILED (not just succeeded)?

---

Visual Regression Tool Setup

Option 1: Playwright Visual (Recommended for Angular)

# Install
npm install -D @playwright/test

# angular.json — add e2e target

// visual.spec.ts
import { test, expect } from '@playwright/test';

test('dashboard visual regression', async ({ page }) => {
  await page.goto('/dashboard');
  await page.waitForLoadState('networkidle');

  // Full page snapshot
  await expect(page).toHaveScreenshot('dashboard.png', {
    fullPage: true,
    threshold: 0.1, // 10% pixel difference tolerance
  });
});

test('mobile breakpoint', async ({ page }) => {
  await page.setViewportSize({ width: 375, height: 812 });
  await page.goto('/dashboard');
  await expect(page).toHaveScreenshot('dashboard-mobile.png');
});

# .github/workflows/visual-regression.yml
name: Visual Regression
on: [pull_request]
jobs:
  visual-test:
    runs-on: ubuntu-latest
    steps:
      - uses: actions/checkout@v4
      - uses: actions/setup-node@v4
        with:
          node-version: '20'
      - run: npm ci
      - run: npx playwright install --with-deps chromium
      - run: npx ng build --configuration=production
      - run: npx playwright test --reporter=html
      - uses: actions/upload-artifact@v4
        if: failure()
        with:
          name: playwright-visual-report
          path: playwright-report/

Option 2: Chromatic (Storybook-based, component-level)

npm install --save-dev chromatic
npx chromatic --project-token=<token> --auto-accept-changes main

# GitHub Actions
- name: Publish to Chromatic
  uses: chromaui/action@latest
  with:
    projectToken: ${{ secrets.CHROMATIC_PROJECT_TOKEN }}
    onlyChanged: true  # Only test changed components

Best for: Angular component libraries with Storybook stories.

Option 3: BackstopJS (Config-based, no Storybook needed)

npm install -g backstopjs
backstop init

// backstop.json
{
  "viewports": [
    { "label": "mobile", "width": 375, "height": 812 },
    { "label": "tablet", "width": 768, "height": 1024 },
    { "label": "desktop", "width": 1440, "height": 900 }
  ],
  "scenarios": [
    {
      "label": "Dashboard",
      "url": "http://localhost:4200/dashboard",
      "selectors": ["#main-content"],
      "delay": 500,
      "misMatchThreshold": 0.1
    }
  ],
  "engine": "playwright"
}

backstop reference  # Create baseline screenshots
backstop test       # Compare against baseline
backstop approve    # Approve changes as new baseline

Option 4: Percy (Cross-browser, cloud-based)

npm install --save-dev @percy/cli @percy/playwright

// In Playwright test
import percySnapshot from '@percy/playwright';

test('dashboard', async ({ page }) => {
  await page.goto('/dashboard');
  await percySnapshot(page, 'Dashboard');
});

---

Flutter Visual Testing

// widget_test.dart — golden file testing
import 'package:flutter_test/flutter_test.dart';
import 'package:golden_toolkit/golden_toolkit.dart';

testGoldens('DashboardScreen renders correctly', (tester) async {
  await loadAppFonts();

  final builder = DeviceBuilder()
    ..overrideDevicesForAllScenarios(devices: [
      Device.phone,
      Device.iphone11,
      Device.tabletPortrait,
    ])
    ..addScenario(
      widget: const DashboardScreen(),
      name: 'default state',
    )
    ..addScenario(
      widget: const DashboardScreen(isLoading: true),
      name: 'loading state',
    );

  await tester.pumpDeviceBuilder(builder);
  await screenMatchesGolden(tester, 'dashboard');
});

# Generate golden files (baseline)
flutter test --update-goldens

# Run comparison
flutter test

---

Analysis Protocol

When performing visual analysis:

1. Describe first — What is literally visible? (shapes, colors, positions, text)
2. Verify goals — Does each element match the stated change?
3. Measure — For rotation/size/position: measure actual pixels, don't estimate
4. Reverse-validate — What would failure look like? Is that what I see?
5. Accessibility — Is contrast sufficient? Are focus rings visible?
6. Cross-platform — Same breakpoints, same themes?
7. Edge cases — Long text, empty states, error states?
8. Conclude — "From the visual evidence, I observe [X]. The goal [is/is not] achieved because [Y]."

---

How This Fits the Review Stack

Layer	Tool	What It Catches
Layer 1 — Design tokens	/lint-design-system	Hardcoded colors, raw spacing
Layer 2 — WCAG	accessibility-auditor agent	Contrast, ARIA, keyboard nav
Layer 3 — Interaction patterns	web-design-guidelines	Loading/empty/error states
Layer 4 — Live screenshot	reality-checker agent	Binary pass/fail with visual evidence
Layer 5 — CI regression	ui-visual-validator (this skill)	Baseline regression, cross-browser

---

Related Skills and Agents

• reality-checker agent — run BEFORE this skill for live browser verdict (Chrome DevTools MCP)
• browser-testing skill — Chrome DevTools MCP + Browser-Use for live UI interaction
• accessibility-audit skill — deeper WCAG 2.1 AA compliance (beyond visual checks)
• web-design-guidelines skill — Vercel Web Interface Guidelines audit (loading/error/empty state patterns)
• design-system skill — token compliance enforcement

Additional Resources

• Playwright Visual Comparisons
• Chromatic Docs
• BackstopJS GitHub
• Flutter Golden Toolkit
• Percy Docs