界面已本地化;技能介绍与说明文档按所选语言由 AI 自动翻译,代码、命令、路径和专业术语保留原文,以原作者文档为准。
探索技能
开发与工程 · SKILL.md

vibe-workflow

vibe-workflow

【开发与工程】Select the appropriate planning, implementation, or debugging workflow for an app project.

独立 GitHub 快照 · 自动分类 · 以原作者文档为准

技能说明

GitHub

name: vibe-workflow description: "Select the appropriate planning, implementation, or debugging workflow for an app project." allowed-tools: Read, Write, Edit, Glob, Grep, Bash, AskUserQuestion

App workflow router

Use the request and existing project state to choose the next useful action. Load only the context needed to identify the outcome, constraints, and current implementation. An existing file does not prove that a stage is complete.

  • New product: use research, PRD, and technical design skills selectively. Quick mode needs a clear outcome, constraints, and acceptance journey; deeper planning is useful for unresolved integrations or consequential decisions.
  • Existing product: implement the requested change in the current architecture. Use a change skill if available; missing planning documents do not require restarting discovery.
  • Broken behavior: reproduce, diagnose, fix, and verify the failure. Use a debugging skill if available, without redoing the new-product interview.
  • Instructions or handoff only: produce the requested artifacts and report their limits; do not begin an unrequested implementation or deployment.

Use vibe-agents when creating project instructions, vibe-build for a new implementation, and an available verification skill for a relevant user journey. Only invoke skills actually present in the target environment. The five stages are a useful route, not five approval gates or a mandatory document set for every edit.

Reuse answered questions and Handoff Context. Ask for missing consequential decisions; otherwise proceed with clearly stated assumptions. Keep stable constraints in AGENTS.md, decisions in product documents, and current progress in MEMORY.md where the project uses it. One builder is sufficient unless independent work and available tools justify delegation.

Complete the scope the user requested, including relevant checks and fixes. When reporting, distinguish actual results from unperformed checks and name any concrete blocker. Do not stop at the first implementation if a working product was requested; do not publish merely because local work is complete.

我的收藏