技能创建器
skill-creator
创建、改进和评估自定义技能,把专业流程转化为可重复使用的 AI 能力。
polymarket-research【数据与研究】Polymarket research and directional trading sub-strategy. Part of paper-trader skill. Research-based probability assessment for directional prediction market trades. SUB-STRATEGY: Managed by parent paper-trader orchestrator.
独立 GitHub 快照 · 自动分类 · 以原作者文档为准
PARENT: This is a sub-strategy of paper-trader. Portfolio-level rules in ../../SKILL.md take precedence.
ROLE: Research-based directional trading on Polymarket to maximize PnL through information edge.
Report to parent orchestrator:
references/research_journal.mdCheck parent before trading:
../../references/master_portfolio.mdYour job within the system:
references/research_journal.md - Trade logsreferences/strategy_evolution.md - Methodology improvementsreferences/thesis_library.md - Active and past thesesreferences/calibration_log.md - Probability calibrationreferences/source_quality.md - Rated sources../../references/rick_preferences.md - Rick's preferences (parent level)Expected Value = (Your Probability × Payout) - (Your Probability of Loss × Stake)
You profit when: Your probability estimate > Market probability + fees
Synthesize public information better than the market.
Sources:
Edge: Markets are slow to process dispersed information
Use historical patterns to estimate probabilities.
Method:
Edge: Markets often anchor on recent events, ignore base rates
Understand what actors will do based on incentives.
Questions:
Edge: Markets underweight game theory
Apply specialized knowledge to niche markets.
Areas:
Edge: Retail traders lack domain expertise
Identify when market sentiment diverges from fundamentals.
Signals:
Edge: Markets overreact to narratives
Initial Screen (5 mins)
Research Phase (30-60 mins)
Probability Estimation
Edge Calculation
Your estimate: X%
Market price: Y%
Fee-adjusted breakeven: Y% + 2%
Edge = X% - (Y% + 2%)
If Edge > 5%: Strong opportunity
If Edge 2-5%: Moderate opportunity
If Edge < 2%: Skip
Thesis Documentation
Document in references/thesis_library.md
f* = (p × (b + 1) - 1) / b
Where:
- f* = fraction of bankroll to bet
- p = your probability estimate
- b = odds (payout / stake - 1)
Use quarter Kelly (f* / 4) to be conservative
EVERY trade must be logged to references/research_journal.md:
## Trade #[N] - [DATE]
**Market**: [Name/URL]
**Direction**: YES/NO
**Entry Price**: $0.XX
**Position Size**: $XXX
**Thesis ID**: [Link to thesis]
### Probability Analysis
- **Base Rate**: X% (from [source])
- **Market Price**: X%
- **My Estimate**: X%
- **Confidence**: High/Medium/Low
- **Edge**: X%
### Key Research Points
1. [Point 1]
2. [Point 2]
3. [Point 3]
### What Would Change My Mind
- [Falsification criterion 1]
- [Falsification criterion 2]
### Outcome
- **Resolution**: YES/NO won
- **P&L**: +/-$XX
- **My estimate was**: Correct/Wrong by X%
### Post-Mortem
- [What I got right]
- [What I got wrong]
- [What I'd do differently]
US Elections:
International:
Policy Decisions:
Price Targets:
Protocol Events:
Regulatory:
Game Outcomes:
Awards/Achievements:
Awards:
Cultural Events:
REQUIRED: Send updates to Rick via Telegram unprompted.
[CLAWDBOT POLYMARKET RESEARCH UPDATE]
Paper Portfolio: $X,XXX (+/-X.X%)
Active Positions (X total):
- [Market]: [YES/NO] @ $0.XX
Thesis: [1-line summary]
Current: $0.XX (+/-X%)
Edge remaining: X%
Today's Research:
- Markets analyzed: X
- New positions: X
- Positions closed: X
Top Opportunity:
[Market name]
- My probability: X%
- Market price: X%
- Edge: X%
- Thesis: [Summary]
Key Developments:
[News affecting positions]
Strategy Notes:
[Research methodology observations]
Calculate metrics:
Calibration Analysis:
For each probability bucket (e.g., 70-80%):
- How many trades were in this bucket?
- What was the actual win rate?
- Am I overconfident or underconfident?
Update references/strategy_evolution.md:
## Iteration #[N] - [DATE]
### Performance Last 10 Trades
- Win Rate: XX%
- Brier Score: X.XX
- Net P&L: +/-$XXX
### Calibration
| Estimate Range | Trades | Actual Win% | Calibration |
|---------------|--------|-------------|-------------|
| 50-60% | X | XX% | Over/Under |
| 60-70% | X | XX% | Over/Under |
| 70-80% | X | XX% | Over/Under |
| 80-90% | X | XX% | Over/Under |
| 90%+ | X | XX% | Over/Under |
### By Category
| Category | Trades | Win% | Avg Edge | P&L |
|----------|--------|------|----------|-----|
| Politics | X | XX% | X% | $XX |
| Crypto | X | XX% | X% | $XX |
| ... | | | | |
### Research Method Effectiveness
- [Which research approaches found edge]
- [Which were waste of time]
### Adjustments
- [Changes to research process]
- [Changes to edge threshold]
- [Categories to focus/avoid]
Update this SKILL.md:
Primary Sources:
News:
Data:
Expert Opinion:
Contrarian Check:
references/research_journal.md - All trade logsreferences/strategy_evolution.md - Methodology improvementsreferences/thesis_library.md - Active and past thesesreferences/source_quality.md - Rated information sourcesreferences/calibration_log.md - Probability calibration trackingAfter every conversation with Rick:
Rick's Known Preferences: