协作头脑风暴
brainstorming
在实现前澄清需求、探索设计选择,并形成清晰的开发方向。
workhuman-cost-tuning【开发与工程】Govern Workhuman recognition budget, award spend, redemption, licensing, services, and integration operations using current customer evidence. Use when reviewing cost and value. Trigger with "optimize Workhuman cost".
独立 GitHub 快照 · 自动分类 · 以原作者文档为准
Build a dated cost and value model that separates contract charges, recognition awards, redemption effects, services, and customer-operated integration costs.
Use Read, Glob, and Grep to inspect approved financial and operational evidence, WebFetch for current public context, and Write or Edit for models, scenarios, and redacted decision records.
Workhuman publicly describes active spend monitoring and control in Admin Hub and a points-based global Store. Public pages do not provide universal customer pricing or prove that one API call, award, point, or redemption has a fixed cost; use customer contract and ledger evidence.
Use read-only authorized exports or reports for analysis. Separate financial, program, and technical access and never expose individual compensation, award, balance, or redemption details in broad reports.
Do not change budgets, award values, eligibility, redemption policy, licenses, contracts, or workforce communications without accountable owners.
Return the reconciled baseline, dated sources, allocation and value metrics, anomalies, scenarios, assumptions, approvals, canary result, and review date.
| Condition | Response |
|---|---|
| Invoice and ledger totals disagree | Preserve both, stop optimization, and route reconciliation to finance and the program owner. |
| A scenario harms equity or recognition quality | Reject it even if nominal spend falls. |
| Pricing evidence is stale | Mark the model provisional and obtain current customer terms. |
A redacted completion receipt might look like this:
window=FY2026-Q3; sources=invoice+award-ledger+ops; reconciliation=exact; scenarios=3; recommendation=canary-schedule-change; savings=not-guaranteed
Review approved changes after a representative cycle and reverse them if participation, equity, quality, or outcomes regress.