计划执行与检查节点
executing-plans
按既定实施计划完成工作,保持过程检查和反馈。
runway-rate-limits【效率与协作】Analyze and control Runway generation concurrency, rolling daily quota, spend limits, and queued tasks without inventing an RPM cap. Use when production traffic is throttled or scaling. Trigger with: "Runway rate limits", "Runway THROTTLED tasks", "Runway concurrency".
独立 GitHub 快照 · 自动分类 · 以原作者文档为准
name: runway-rate-limits description: >- Analyze and control Runway generation concurrency, rolling daily quota, spend limits, and queued tasks without inventing an RPM cap. Use when production traffic is throttled or scaling. Trigger with: "Runway rate limits", "Runway THROTTLED tasks", "Runway concurrency". allowed-tools: Read, Grep, Write, Edit version: 2.0.0 argument-hint: '[workload-and-tier]' model: inherit effort: high license: MIT author: Jeremy Longshore jeremy@intentsolutions.io tags:
Runway generation capacity is governed by usage-tier limits, not a universal requests-per-minute number. The application must distinguish accepted-but-queued THROTTLED tasks from create requests rejected with 429, then apply local admission control to protect deadlines and budget.
Review the organization Usage page and current tiers documentation. Record per-model concurrency, rolling 24-hour generation cap, 30-day spend cap, and any approved enterprise exception.
Count create attempts, accepted task IDs, THROTTLED depth and age, running tasks, terminal states, queue wait, execution time, and rolling daily use per model and organization.
Use per-model semaphores below the provider concurrency boundary, a global budget guard, priority queues, and customer deadlines. Do not add arbitrary RPM sleeps that hide the actual capacity model.
THROTTLED correctlyKeep the existing task ID and continue bounded observation. Do not create a replacement task; Runway has already stored and queued it.
429 correctlyDetermine whether the rolling daily generation quota or another documented limit was exceeded. Stop new admission, calculate when capacity returns, and retry only within the documented transient policy and operation deadline.
Adjust worker concurrency from queue age, terminal throughput, failure rate, and spend—not request count alone. Request an official exception when the documented tiers cannot meet the service objective.
Usage and task reads use the same server-side organization credential as generation. Limit telemetry should identify organization and model without exporting the API secret, prompt contents, or temporary media URLs.
Use Read and Grep to inspect application configuration, provider documentation, lockfiles, fixtures, schemas, tests, and redacted operational evidence before proposing a change. Use Write or Edit only for an approved implementation, configuration, test, runbook, or redacted receipt. Do not create, cancel, delete, retry, deploy, rotate, revoke, publish, or otherwise mutate production Runway resources without explicit operator approval.
Return the environment, organization alias, operation and task identifiers, API and SDK versions, model or router policy, source-contract fingerprint, task-state evidence, credit boundary, output disposition, unresolved risk, rollback state, and final decision without exposing API secrets, prompt or media contents, or temporary signed URLs.
An organization can run five concurrent jobs for a model. The service admits four, keeps one slot for urgent work, retains additional jobs in its own priority queue, and never duplicates a provider task observed as THROTTLED.
| Failure | Response |
|---|---|
| Engineer assumes a fixed RPM limit | Replace the assumption with current per-model concurrency, rolling daily quota, and spend evidence. |
THROTTLED tasks are resubmitted | Stop the duplicate path, reconcile task IDs, and account for unintended credits. |
Daily quota returns 429 | Pause admission until rolling capacity is available or obtain an approved tier exception. |
Load-test the local queue with a fake provider, prove per-model isolation and no duplicate resubmission, simulate THROTTLED and rolling-quota 429, and compare configured controls with current organization limits.