界面已本地化;技能介绍与说明文档按所选语言由 AI 自动翻译,代码、命令、路径和专业术语保留原文,以原作者文档为准。
探索技能
数据与研究 · SKILL.md

miro-prod-checklist

miro-prod-checklist

【数据与研究】Audit repository readiness for a fail-closed Miro production release across authorization, data, resilience, rollback, and an approval-gated live handoff. Use when preparing to enable a Miro integration in production. Trigger with "ship Miro integration".

独立 GitHub 快照 · 自动分类 · 以原作者文档为准

技能说明

GitHub

name: miro-prod-checklist description: "Audit repository readiness for a fail-closed Miro production release across authorization, data, resilience, rollback, and an approval-gated live handoff. Use when preparing to enable a Miro integration in production. Trigger with "ship Miro integration"." argument-hint: "[release-sha] [environment]" allowed-tools: Read, Glob, Grep, WebFetch, Write, Edit version: 1.9.0 author: Jeremy Longshore jeremy@intentsolutions.io license: MIT tags:

  • saas
  • miro
  • production
  • release model: inherit effort: high compatibility: Designed for Claude Code; live work requires an authorized Miro app and redacted evidence

Miro Production Readiness Gate

Overview

Turn production approval into an evidence-backed decision bound to one immutable release and app configuration; use the evidence produced here to make the next decision explicit and reviewable.

Prerequisites

  • Immutable release candidate and deployment manifest
  • Production app/team ownership and approved scopes
  • Test, observability, incident, rollback, and data-handling evidence

Tool Discipline

Use Read, Glob, and Grep to inspect the repository, configuration names, adapters, tests, and evidence. Use WebFetch only for current official Miro documentation. Use Write or Edit after confirming the requested mode, target environment, tenant, board, and approval boundary. These declared tools do not call authenticated Miro APIs or deployment CLIs; implement client, configuration, and test changes, then return exact operator commands or an approval-gated handoff for live execution.

Current Contract

  • Production REST uses v2 resource endpoints and OAuth under /v1/oauth.
  • Experimental features are not production contracts and must be isolated behind explicit risk acceptance.
  • Rate capacity is credit-weighted and must include all callers for a user/application pair.
  • Miro service status, token revocation, and tenant mismatch need operational responses before launch.

Authentication

For REST work, use OAuth 2.0 Authorization Code with the narrowest Miro scopes. Bind each encrypted token record to its user, application, authorized team, and granted scopes. Never print access tokens, refresh tokens, client secrets, authorization codes, or board content.

Instructions

  1. Bind the review to release SHA, dependency lock, app ID hash, scopes, redirect URIs, and environment.
  2. Verify tenant isolation, expiring-token rotation, revocation, least privilege, and redaction controls.
  3. Run unit, contract, bounded live-read, failure, rate, rollback, and recovery tests.
  4. Confirm dashboards, alerts, runbooks, owner/on-call, status dependency, retention, and support escalation.
  5. List every mutation and experimental dependency; require an explicit disposition for each.
  6. Issue GO only when all blocking evidence is current; otherwise return NO-GO with owners and retest criteria.

Approval Boundaries

Production deployment, new app installation, scope changes, initial write enablement, and risk acceptance require the designated owners' explicit approval. Pause when the responsible owner or exact target is uncertain.

Output

Return GO/NO-GO, immutable identity, gate table, evidence links, approvals, rollback trigger, residual risks, and expiry date. State what was not inspected or changed so the receipt cannot overclaim coverage.

Error Handling

ConditionResponse
Release identity changesInvalidate the approval and rerun affected gates.
Evidence is missing or staleReturn NO-GO.
Rollback is untestedReturn NO-GO for write-capable releases.
Experimental dependency is undisclosedStop and route for explicit risk review.

Examples

The example is a redacted operator receipt; identifiers are hashes or bounded labels, not board content or credentials.

sha=8f2c1a7; env=prod; gates=18/18; scopes=approved; rollback=passed; experimental=0; decision=GO

Resources

我的收藏