技能创建器
skill-creator
创建、改进和评估自定义技能,把专业流程转化为可重复使用的 AI 能力。
suede-revops【数据与研究】Suede-owned revenue-operations discipline. Use when defining lead scoring and routing, MQL or SQL criteria, pipeline stages, CRM hygiene, automation, deal-desk rules, or marketing-to-sales handoffs. NOT FOR: writing outreach (use suede-cold-email), lifecycle campaigns (use suede-emails), pricing strategy (use suede-pricing), or mutating production CR…
独立 GitHub 快照 · 自动分类 · 以原作者文档为准
Suede RevOps maps the lifecycle rules, data contracts, scoring, routing, and handoffs that connect acquisition, sales, and customer success. It produces implementation-ready operating logic while keeping production CRM mutation behind live-schema review and approval.
Check for product marketing context first:
If .agents/product-marketing.md exists (or .claude/product-marketing.md, or the legacy product-marketing-context.md filename, in older setups), read it before asking questions. Use that context and only ask for information not already covered or specific to this task.
Gather this context (ask if not provided):
Work with whatever the user gives you. If they have a clear problem area, start there. Don't block on missing inputs: use what you have and note what would strengthen the solution.
One system of record for every lead and account. If data lives in multiple places, it will conflict. Pick a CRM as the canonical source and sync everything to it.
Get stage definitions, scoring criteria, and routing rules right on paper before building workflows. Automating a broken process just creates broken results faster.
Every handoff between teams is a potential leak. Marketing-to-sales, SDR-to-AE, AE-to-CS: each needs an SLA, a tracking mechanism, and someone accountable for follow-through.
Marketing, sales, and customer success must agree on definitions. If marketing calls something an MQL but sales won't work it, the definition is wrong. Alignment meetings aren't optional.
| Stage | Entry Criteria | Exit Criteria | Owner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subscriber | Opts in to content (blog, newsletter) | Provides company info or shows engagement | Marketing |
| Lead | Identified contact with basic info | Meets minimum fit criteria | Marketing |
| MQL | Passes fit + engagement threshold | Sales accepts or rejects within SLA | Marketing |
| SQL | Sales accepts and qualifies via conversation | Opportunity created or recycled | Sales (SDR/AE) |
| Opportunity | Budget, authority, need, timeline confirmed | Closed-won or closed-lost | Sales (AE) |
| Customer | Closed-won deal | Expands, renews, or churns | CS / Account Mgmt |
| Evangelist | High NPS, referral activity, case study | Ongoing program participation | CS / Marketing |
An MQL requires both fit and engagement:
Neither alone is sufficient. A perfect-fit company that never engages isn't an MQL. A student downloading every ebook isn't an MQL.
Define response times and document them:
For complete lifecycle stage templates and SLA examples: See references/lifecycle-definitions.md
Explicit scoring (fit): Who they are:
Implicit scoring (engagement): What they do:
Negative scoring: Disqualifying signals:
For detailed scoring templates and example models: See references/scoring-models.md
| Method | How It Works | Best For |
|---|---|---|
| Round-robin | Distribute evenly across reps | Equal territories, similar deal sizes |
| Territory-based | Assign by geography, vertical, or segment | Regional teams, industry specialists |
| Account-based | Named accounts go to named reps | ABM motions, strategic accounts |
| Skill-based | Route by deal complexity, product line, or language | Diverse product lines, global teams |
Response time is one of the largest controllable factors in lead conversion. Widely cited vendor studies (Lead Connect, InsideSales) report order-of-magnitude differences; treat the ordering as reliable and the multipliers as unverified until measured on your own data:
Build routing rules that prioritize speed. Alert reps immediately. Escalate if SLA is missed.
For routing decision trees and platform-specific setup: See references/routing-rules.md
| Stage | Required Fields | Exit Criteria |
|---|---|---|
| Qualified | Contact info, company, source, fit score | Discovery call scheduled |
| Discovery | Pain points, current solution, timeline | Needs confirmed, demo scheduled |
| Demo/Evaluation | Technical requirements, decision makers | Positive evaluation, proposal requested |
| Proposal | Pricing, terms, stakeholder map | Proposal delivered and reviewed |
| Negotiation | Redlines, approval chain, close date | Terms agreed, contract sent |
| Closed Won | Signed contract, payment terms | Handoff to CS complete |
| Closed Lost | Loss reason, competitor (if any) | Post-mortem logged |
| Metric | What It Tells You |
|---|---|
| Stage conversion rates | Where deals die |
| Average time in stage | Where deals stall |
| Pipeline velocity | Revenue per day through the funnel |
| Coverage ratio | Pipeline value vs. quota (target 3-4x) |
| Win rate by source | Which channels produce real revenue |
Platform-agnostic build list: the set to design before the stack is decided, in build order:
For the trigger and action definitions per platform: HubSpot workflows, Salesforce Flow equivalents, Calendly/SavvyCal, and Zapier patterns, including round-robin, routing by criteria, and pre-meeting enrichment: See references/automation-playbooks.md. Read it once the CRM is known; build from the list above when it is not.
| Deal Size | Approval Required |
|---|---|
| Standard pricing | Auto-approved |
| 10-20% discount | Sales manager |
| 20-40% discount | VP Sales |
| 40%+ discount or custom terms | Deal desk review |
| Multi-year / enterprise | Finance + Legal |
Document every exception. Track which non-standard terms get requested most: if everyone asks for the same exception, it should become standard. Review quarterly.
Enrichment vendors are listed under Tool Integrations below, with the provenance, freshness, lawful-basis, and credit-cost checks that apply before proposing any of them.
| Metric | Formula / Definition | Benchmark |
|---|---|---|
| Lead-to-MQL rate | MQLs / Total leads | 5-15% |
| MQL-to-SQL rate | SQLs / MQLs | 30-50% |
| SQL-to-Opportunity | Opportunities / SQLs | 50-70% |
| Pipeline velocity | (# deals x avg deal size x win rate) / avg sales cycle | Varies by ACV |
| CAC | Total sales + marketing spend / new customers | LTV:CAC > 3:1 |
| LTV:CAC ratio | Customer lifetime value / CAC | 3:1 to 5:1 healthy |
| Speed-to-lead | Time from form fill to first rep contact | < 5 minutes ideal |
| Win rate | Closed-won / total opportunities | 20-30% (varies) |
Build three views:
When delivering RevOps recommendations, provide:
Format each as a standalone document the user can implement directly. Include platform-specific guidance when the CRM is known.
These are evaluation examples, not guaranteed integrations. Verify the live schema, authenticated account, permissions, API limits, pricing, and vendor documentation before proposing implementation.
| Tool Category | Examples | Verify Before Use |
|---|---|---|
| CRM | HubSpot, Salesforce | Objects, fields, ownership, automation, permissions |
| Scheduling | Calendly, SavvyCal | Routing logic, availability, privacy |
| Enrichment | Clearbit, Apollo | Provenance, freshness, lawful basis, credit cost |
| Automation | ActiveCampaign, Zapier | Trigger scope, retries, rollback, secrets |
| Partner operations | Introw, Crossbeam | Account matching, deal rules, commissions |
suede-prospecting to build and qualify the source list.suede-cold-email for approved outbound sequence copy.suede-sales-enablement for collateral and rep-facing materials.suede-analytics for pipeline measurement and attribution.suede-pricing when deal-desk work turns into a pricing decision:
discount tiers that keep getting overridden, a non-standard term everyone
requests, or list-price and packaging changes.