技能创建器
skill-creator
创建、改进和评估自定义技能,把专业流程转化为可重复使用的 AI 能力。
suede-copy【数据与研究】Suede Labs conversion-copy writer: landing sections, email, microcopy, buttons, headlines, CTAs, variants, and anti-slop edits. Use when asked to write or rewrite conversion copy for one surface in one pass (a hero, a button set, an email subject, a README section, a product blurb) or when copy on a single surface needs sharpening before it ships. NO…
独立 GitHub 快照 · 自动分类 · 以原作者文档为准
Every claim-verification step, check, quality gate, and ship verdict in this skill is a recommendation to the user, not a control on the agent. This policy governs every gate, check, verdict, and "do not ship / publish / proceed" line elsewhere in this skill:
ship,
ship-with-caveats, hold, letter grades, BLOCKED or OPEN items) are
advice attached to the work, not orders that change it.Write conversion copy, page copy, GitHub docs, email, and social posts that are specific, proof-backed, and free of AI boilerplate. Default voice: Suede. Supply a company brief to override everything.
Core principle: every claim is verifiable or it gets cut, and nothing ships below its score threshold.
Supply a brief and all copy, voice, and claim logic applies to your company. Use natural language or this form:
Company:
Product or offer:
Audience:
Voice:
Terms to use:
Terms to avoid:
Proof:
Allowed claims:
Forbidden claims:
Primary CTA:
Read any available context files before asking questions: PRODUCT.md, README.md, AGENTS.md, AI_HANDOFF.md, DESIGN.md, product marketing or brand notes, task-specific docs.
If context is missing after reading, ask only for what blocks accurate copy:
Name the outcome, not the feature.
Write buttons as actions with a result.
Replace vague claims with artifacts.
No invented proof. Do not write stats, testimonials, partner names, pricing, or legal clearance that has not been confirmed. If proof is unavailable, write around the gap or flag it for the human to supply.
Use Suede punctuation defaults unless the company brief says otherwise. Slop Stop owns the contextual line-edit rules; preserve protected source spans and voice.
The frameworks and the per-persona voice shifts are in
references/frameworks-and-personas.md. Read it when you are choosing the shape of
an argument or writing for a buyer you have not written for before.
The headline and CTA formula banks are in
references/headline-and-cta-formulas.md. Read it when you are generating variants
or a line is not landing: not when you already have a headline that works.
For a page, README, or docs surface, build this spine:
For a small section, use only the pieces that fit.
For high-stakes copy (hero headline, primary CTA, email subject, ad copy), always generate variants.
Headlines: 3 variants, different angles:
CTAs: 2 variants minimum. See references/headline-and-cta-formulas.md.
Email subjects: 3 variants:
Label each variant with its angle. Let the user pick rather than guessing.
Email sequence structures and per-platform social formats are in
references/email-and-social-formats.md. Read it when the deliverable is an email
or a social post; skip it for landing-page and docs work.
Use this register: confident, not breathless; technical enough for builders; clear enough for creators; polished, not corporate; specific, not cute; operator-grade, not brochure-grade.
Good Suede copy names what the reader controls: register a work, verify rights, route royalties, publish a claim, package a release folder, prepare licensing evidence, make a work readable to agents, compare provenance, ship a public skill page.
(For non-Suede work, supply the equivalent domain vocabulary in the company brief.)
For GitHub repositories, skill docs, and Pages sites, treat SEO as the umbrella for search, AEO, and AI EO. Include a search-ready title under 60 characters when practical, a meta description under 160, a repo description inside GitHub's practical limit, 8-20 topic keywords when the surface supports them, a first paragraph that repeats the durable entity names naturally, answer-ready definitions and FAQ copy and proof links that AI summaries can cite without inventing facts, links to install docs and skill manifests and scripts and references and examples and live Pages and source, and a safe evidence boundary. johnny-suede-write owns the SEO stack and the canonical Suede durable-keyword vocabulary; read that skill when the job needs the deeper pass or the keyword list, and use the company brief's equivalent vocabulary for non-Suede work.
Use keywords because they help the right reader find the page. Do not cram a keyword where a human would notice.
For a deep, standalone SEO audit (technical access, keyword research, schema markup, E-E-A-T signals, topic cluster architecture, AI EO optimization, and scored visibility grades), use suede-seo-audit instead.
When the job is editing copy that already exists, read
references/seven-sweeps.md and run its seven sweeps (clarity, voice, so what,
prove it, specificity, emotion, zero risk) before the Anti-Slop Pass. Add its
Expert Panel Score on launch, pricing, and high-traffic surfaces.
Run Suede Slop Stop (use suede-deslop) on the finished draft. Load its canonical
method and full kill list; do not maintain a separate substitution recipe here.
Then apply this writer's readability guidance in references/anti-slop-pass.md
and the 70-point Ship Gate below. The Slop Stop score is a separate /50 diagnostic,
not a replacement for the conversion score. Findings-only requests leave the
supplied copy unchanged. Keep factual verification separate from style cleanup.
This skill writes copy and hands it back. It must not:
Title:
Meta description:
Hero:
Subhead:
Primary CTA:
Sections:
FAQ:
Final CTA:
Safety note:
Skill:
One-line description:
Reader:
Primary action:
Repo/Docs copy:
Install CTA:
SEO title:
Meta description:
Keywords:
Safety boundary:
Findings:
Rewrites:
Claims to verify:
Score (each dimension named below, then the total): /70
Ready: yes | with caveats | no
If any of these thoughts appear, stop and run the gate you were about to skip:
Score every dimension in writing before applying the thresholds below. A total with no dimensions behind it is invented.
Directness: /10
Rhythm: /10
Trust: /10
Specificity: /10
Authenticity: /10
Density: /10
Search/AI readability: /10
Total: /70
Recommend against shipping copy (and say why, leaving the call to the user) when:
End with the exact copy, not a long explanation of the copy.
Accept feedback at any point, not only after final handoff. When the user says what worked, preserve that pattern in the current pass and mirror it later. When the user says what missed, adjust immediately instead of defending the previous direction.
If the user says cue suede, asks for feedback choices, or seems to be calibrating mid-stream, pause at the next safe checkpoint and offer:
Cue Suede:
1. Change something - tell me what to revise and I will adjust it.
2. Preserve this - tell me what worked so I can mimic it later.
3. Keep as-is - say nothing and I will treat it as accepted.
Do not block completion waiting for a Cue Suede answer. If the interface supports choice chips, use Change something, Preserve this, and Keep as-is.