视觉画布设计
canvas-design
基于设计原则创作静态视觉作品,用于海报与品牌图形。
product-onboarding-flow【文档与办公】Use this skill when designing user onboarding flows: activation milestones, funnel mapping, progressive disclosure, and drop-off analysis. This skill enforces: activation milestone definition, funnel mapping, progressive disclosure patterns, onboarding experimentation. Do NOT use for: email drip campaigns, documentation writing, tutorial video produc…
独立 GitHub 快照 · 自动分类 · 以原作者文档为准
Designs and optimizes user onboarding flows including activation milestones, funnel mapping, progressive disclosure, and experimentation. The goal is to get new users to experience the core value of the product as quickly as possible, maximizing activation rate and long-term retention.
Exact user phrases: onboarding flow, user onboarding, user activation, new user experience, product tour, activation rate.
Onboarding flow design with activation milestone, funnel steps, progressive disclosure plan, and experiment framework.
## Onboarding Flow Design
### Activation Milestone
{action} within {timeframe} → User activated
### Funnel
Signup → {step 1} → {step 2} → Activation
Current CR: {X%} | Target CR: {Y%}
### Progressive Disclosure
Day 1: {core features shown}
Day 3: {advanced features shown}
Day 7: {power features shown}
### Drop-off Analysis
Step | Drop-off | Root Cause | Action
{step} | {X%} | {cause} | {solution}
### Experiment Pipeline
{hypothesis} | {variant} | {expected lift}
No preamble. No postamble. No explanations.
7000 tokens
| Level | Name | Characteristics | Metrics |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | None | No defined onboarding, users left to explore | High drop-off, low activation |
| 2 | Basic | Generic product tour, welcome email | Basic activation tracking |
| 3 | Guided | In-app guidance, checklist, role-based path | Funnel tracked, experiments running |
| 4 | Personalized | Segment-specific flows, adaptive content | Segmented activation, behavior-triggered |
| 5 | Continuous | Onboarding never stops; re-onboarding, upgrade paths | Lifecycle onboarding, full user journey |
Unaware → Aware → Interested → Signed Up → Setup Started → First Value → Activated → Engaged → Retained
0% 10% 25% 40% 55% 70% 85% 92% 100%
The critical transition is from "First Value" to "Activated" — this is where users experience the Aha moment.
| Type | Description | Best For | Example |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sequential wizard | Step-by-step setup flow | Complex products with configuration | Project setup, profile creation |
| Progressive disclosure | Features revealed over time | Feature-rich products | SaaS platforms, creative tools |
| Empty state guided | First-use experience with sample data | Content-heavy products | CRM, project management |
| Interactive demo | Simulated product experience | Sales-led products | Enterprise SaaS |
| Self-serve exploration | Minimal guidance, powerful defaults | Simple consumer products | Social apps, messaging |
| Checklist-based | Task list guiding to activation | Goal-oriented products | Productivity tools |
| Role-based | Different flows for different user types | Multi-user products | Admin vs member onboarding |
An Aha moment is the specific interaction where users realize the product's value. Characteristics:
Identify the Aha moment — the specific action where users realize the product's core value. Define activation as a measurable event (not time): e.g., created first project, invited team member, completed first workflow. Set target time window (within 24h, within first session). Validate that activated users retain at higher rates.
To identify the Aha moment:
Example analysis:
Candidate Event | D30 Retention (Did Event) | D30 Retention (Didn't) | Lift
First project created | 65% | 22% | 2.95x
First team member invited | 72% | 31% | 2.32x
First workflow completed | 58% | 28% | 2.07x
≡≡ Activation = Created first project within 24 hours of signup
Map the full onboarding funnel: signup → welcome → setup → first action → activation → engagement. Measure conversion rate at each step. Segment funnel by acquisition channel, plan tier, and user role. Calculate absolute drop-off (most users lost at which step). Identify friction points per step.
Funnel mapping template:
Funnel: New User Onboarding
Timebox: 24 hours from signup
Step | Event | Users Entering | Step Conversion | Absolute Conversion | Drop-off
1. Signup | signup_completed | 10,000 | 100% | 100% | 0%
2. Email verified | email_verified | 8,500 | 85% | 85% | 15%
3. Account setup | setup_completed | 6,000 | 71% | 60% | 29%
4. First core action | first_core_action | 4,200 | 70% | 42% | 30%
5. Activation | activation_milestone | 3,000 | 71% | 30% | 29%
Biggest absolute drop-off: Step 3 → Step 4 (1,800 users lost)
Segment the funnel by:
Design a progressive disclosure schedule. Day 1: show only core features needed for activation. Day 3: introduce complementary features that deepen engagement. Day 7: reveal advanced and power-user features. Use tooltips, banners, and checklists. Avoid overwhelming new users.
Progressive disclosure schedule template:
Phase 1 (First Session — 0-30 min):
Goal: Reach activation milestone
Show: Signup → Onboarding checklist → Core feature → Activation celebration
UI Patterns: Guided setup wizard, progress bar, inline tips
Phase 2 (Day 1-3):
Goal: Deepen engagement with core feature
Show: Secondary features, integrations, team setup
UI Patterns: Tooltip announcements, contextual suggestions, email tips
Phase 3 (Day 4-7):
Goal: Build habit and power usage
Show: Advanced features, shortcuts, templates, power user tips
UI Patterns: Feature discovery modal, in-app messages, weekly digest
Phase 4 (Day 8+):
Goal: Prevent churn, drive advocacy
Show: Referral program, premium features (for free users), best practices
UI Patterns: Re-engagement campaigns, feature highlight banners, NPS survey
Analyze where and why users drop off. Common causes: unclear value proposition, too many steps, technical friction (slow load, broken flow), information overload, no clear next step. Quantify impact of each friction point. Prioritize fixes by impact on activation rate.
Root cause analysis techniques:
| Technique | When to Use | Method |
|---|---|---|
| Session replay analysis | Visual drop-off without clear cause | Watch 20-30 sessions of users who dropped off at each step |
| User survey | Need direct feedback | Exit survey: "What prevented you from completing?" |
| Heatmap analysis | Interface confusion | Heatmap + click tracking on onboarding pages |
| Expert review | Known UX issues common to your product type | Heuristic evaluation of onboarding flow |
| A/B test diagnosis | Testing multiple hypotheses | Controlled experiments on suspected friction points |
Common onboarding friction categories:
| Category | Examples | Fix Strategy |
|---|---|---|
| Motivational | "Why should I do this?" | Strengthen value prop, show benefits, social proof |
| Technical | Slow loading, broken links, errors | Performance optimization, error handling, fallback states |
| Cognitive | Too many choices, unclear instructions | Simplify, reduce options, progressive disclosure |
| Commitment | "Is this worth my time?" | Reduce required fields, allow skip, show progress |
| Confidence | "Will I break something?" | Undo options, preview before committing, safety nets |
Create experiment pipeline to improve activation. Typical experiments: reduce signup fields, add interactive demo, improve welcome email, change CTAs, add progress indicator, implement checklist. Measure activation rate, time-to-activation, and Day 7 retention. Iterate on winning variants.
Experiment prioritization framework:
| Hypothesis | Expected Lift | Effort | Confidence | Priority |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Reduce signup from 8 fields to 4 | +15% activation | 2 days | High | P0 |
| Add interactive product demo | +20% activation | 2 weeks | Medium | P1 |
| Personalized onboarding path by role | +10% activation | 3 weeks | Medium | P2 |
Experiments to consider:
| Experiment | Description | Typical Impact | Implementation |
|---|---|---|---|
| Reduce form fields | Shorter signup forms | +10-25% completion | Remove non-essential fields, defer to later |
| Social signup | Google/Apple login | +15-30% signup rate | OAuth integration |
| Interactive demo | Simulated product experience | +15-20% activation | Guided product tour with sample data |
| Progress indicator | Show onboarding progress | +10-15% completion | Progress bar with milestones |
| Value-first design | Show value before asking for setup | +20-30% activation | "See your dashboard" before "Set up your profile" |
| Checklist | Gamified task list | +15-25% activation | Visual checklist with rewards |
| Email sequence | Nurture emails during onboarding | +10-20% activation | Drip campaign triggered by user actions |
| In-app guidance | Contextual tooltips and hints | +5-15% activation | Hotspots, tooltips, banners |
Design the experience after activation to ensure users don't churn after the initial success:
Post-activation milestones:
| Milestone | Description | Timing | Metric |
|---|---|---|---|
| Repeated activation | User performs activation action again | Day 3 | D3 return rate |
| Feature expansion | User adopts second core feature | Week 1 | Feature adoption rate |
| Habit formation | User uses product with increasing frequency | Week 2 | DAU/MAU trend |
| Value reinforcement | User achieves significant outcome | Month 1 | Goal completion |
| Pitfall | Description | Prevention |
|---|---|---|
| One-size-fits-all onboarding | Same flow for all user segments | Segment users by role, intent, and source |
| Feature overload in first session | Showing too many features at once | Progressive disclosure; limit to activation-relevant features |
| Ignoring mobile users | Desktop-optimized onboarding on mobile | Design responsive/adaptive onboarding flows |
| No post-activation plan | Users activate then churn | Design Day 3/7/30 engagement sequences |
| Fake activation metrics | Defining activation too loosely (e.g., "viewed dashboard") | Activation must be a meaningful value event correlated with retention |
| Skipping empty states | Not designing for users with no data | Empty states with guidance and sample data |
| No failure recovery | Users error and have no way to get help | Error messages, help links, support chat during onboarding |
| Too much text | Walls of instructions no one reads | Visual guidance, short tooltips, video alternatives |
| Over-engineering before validation | Building complex onboarding before testing hypothesis | MVP onboarding: test with 5 users, iterate |
| Silent friction | Not measuring drop-off causes | Session recording, exit surveys, heatmaps |
| Practice | Rationale |
|---|---|
| Show value before asking for commitment | Users who see value first are more willing to set up |
| Reduce every form to minimum viable fields | Each extra field drops conversion 5-10% |
| Use social signup as primary option | Reduces friction and improves data quality |
| Design empty states with guidance | First-time users see clear next steps, not blank screens |
| Celebrate activation milestones | Positive reinforcement builds momentum |
| Provide undo for everything | Reduces anxiety about making mistakes |
| Use progress indicators during multi-step flows | Users are more likely to complete with visible progress |
| A/B test everything, even the welcome email | Small changes can have outsized impact on activation |
| Personalize onboarding by user role and intent | Relevant content converts better than generic |
| Monitor time-to-activation alongside activation rate | Fast activation correlates with better retention |
Hypothesis: {action} within {timeframe} is the activation milestone
Analysis:
1. Users who completed {action} within {timeframe}: {N} — {X%} D30 retention
2. Users who did NOT complete {action} within {timeframe}: {N} — {Y%} D30 retention
3. Retention lift: {X / Y}x
4. Minimum lift threshold: 2.0x
Validation: {Pass/Fail — lift exceeds threshold}
Activation definition confirmed: {Yes/No}
User Segment: {segment description}
Source: {acquisition channel}
Goal: {what success looks like for this segment}
Funnel Steps:
| # | Step | Success Event | Expected CR | Target CR | Notes |
|---|------|---------------|-------------|-----------|-------|
| 1 | {step} | {event} | {X%} | {Y%} | {notes} |
| 2 | {step} | {event} | {X%} | {Y%} | {notes} |
Activation Milestone: {event} within {timeframe}
Progressive Disclosure:
- Session 1: {features}
- Day 2-3: {features}
- Week 1: {features}
- Week 2+: {features}
Potential Friction Points:
1. {point} — {mitigation}
2. {point} — {mitigation}
Experiment Ideas:
1. {idea} — {expected impact}
2. {idea} — {expected impact}
| Event | Trigger | Properties | Purpose |
|---|---|---|---|
| onboarding_started | User begins onboarding flow | source, plan_tier, user_role | Funnel entry |
| onboarding_step_completed | User completes a step | step_name, step_number | Step conversion tracking |
| onboarding_skipped | User skips a step | step_name, skip_reason | Friction analysis |
| onboarding_dropped_out | User leaves without completing | last_step, time_spent, page_exit | Drop-off analysis |
| activation_milestone_reached | User completes activation event | event_name, time_since_signup | Activation tracking |
| guided_tip_dismissed | User dismisses a tooltip | tip_id, time_to_dismiss | Guidance effectiveness |
A B2B SaaS product had a 10-field signup form with only 25% completion rate. Analytics showed 55% of users started the form but 40% dropped off at the "company size" field, which was required but appeared too early. The team reduced the form to 4 fields (email, password, name, role), moved company info to a post-signup survey, and added Google SSO. Signup completion increased from 25% to 68%, and overall activation rate increased 40% because more users reached the activation milestone.
Method: Funnel analysis + session replay on signup form Key finding: Company size field caused 40% drop-off due to appearing too early Impact: Signup completion 25% to 68%, activation rate increased 40%
A team collaboration tool with 5 user roles (admin, manager, contributor, viewer, external) used the same onboarding for everyone. Activation rate was 22% for admins but only 8% for contributors. Role-specific onboarding paths were created: admins saw workspace setup, contributors saw task management, viewers saw reporting. Contributor activation increased from 8% to 31%, and overall activation rose from 18% to 34%.
Method: User segmentation analysis → role-based onboarding design Key insight: Different roles have different Aha moments and setup needs Impact: Contributor activation 8% to 31%, overall activation 18% to 34%
A data analytics SaaS tested two onboarding approaches. The original product tour (screenshot slides explaining features) had a 12% activation rate. An interactive demo (sample dataset with guided analysis tasks) was tested against it. The interactive demo achieved a 34% activation rate — nearly 3x higher. Users who went through the interactive demo also had 25% higher D30 retention.
Method: A/B test: product tour vs interactive demo Key finding: Active learning (doing tasks) beats passive learning (viewing slides) Impact: Activation 12% to 34%, D30 retention improved 25%
For analytics tracking of onboarding metrics, hand off to product-analytics. For A/B testing onboarding changes, hand off to product-ab-testing.
` interface EventObserver { onEvent(event: T): Promise; }
class EventBus { private observers: Set<EventObserver> = new Set(); subscribe(observer: EventObserver): void { this.observers.add(observer); } unsubscribe(observer: EventObserver): void { this.observers.delete(observer); } async emit(event: T): Promise { const results = Array.from(this.observers).map(o => o.onEvent(event)); await Promise.allSettled(results); } } `
config: defaults: timeout: 30s retryCount: 3 overrides: production: timeout: 60s retryCount: 5 development: timeout: 300s retryCount: 1
| Metric | Threshold | Severity | Action |
|---|---|---|---|
| Error rate | > 1% over 5min | Critical | Page on-call |
| p99 latency | > 2s over 5min | Warning | Investigate |
| Throughput drop | > 50% over 1min | Critical | Check upstream |
| Queue depth | > 1000 over 1min | Warning | Scale consumers |
| Disk usage | > 85% | Warning | Clean or expand |
| Memory usage | > 90% heap | Critical | Restart or scale |
| Anti-Pattern | Symptom | Root Cause | Solution |
|---|---|---|---|
| Premature optimization | Complex code for no measured benefit | Guessing instead of profiling | Measure first, optimize based on data |
| Copy-paste reuse | Duplicate code across codebase | Lack of abstraction | Extract shared logic into libraries |
| Gold-plating | Features with no current requirement | Over-engineering | YAGNI — build what's needed now |
| Magical thinking | Assumptions without validation | Skipping error handling | Handle all failure modes explicitly |
Cache hierarchy: L1 (in-memory local) → L2 (distributed Redis/Memcached) → L3 (CDN/Edge). Cache invalidation: TTL-based (simple, stale), event-based (complex, fresh), write-through (consistent, higher write latency), write-behind (fast writes, eventual consistency).