计划执行与检查节点
executing-plans
按既定实施计划完成工作,保持过程检查和反馈。
s4h-sensory-detail-mining【效率与协作】Finds specific details being overlooked — the most important information is often present but not being registered. Triggers: 'what are we missing', 'go deeper on this', 'find the details', 'be more specific', 'what exactly is happening', 'ground this in specifics'.
独立 GitHub 快照 · 自动分类 · 以原作者文档为准
Abstractions are useful — but they lose the specific detail that often contains the real insight. "Users are frustrated" is an abstraction that conceals which users, in which moment, doing what, saying what exactly. Detail mining forces that concealment back into the open.
Step 1: Take the Current Description Work with whatever account, analysis, or summary exists. This is the starting material — it contains the abstractions to excavate.
Framing check: Confirm the specific subject before continuing. State what you've identified — the actual material being excavated and what kind of abstraction it primarily deals in — in one sentence, then use AskUserQuestion:
Step 2: Identify Where It's Abstract Mark every place the description uses categories, summaries, or generalisations instead of specific observed instances. Words like "often," "users," "usually," "issues," "problems," and "feedback" are abstraction signals.
Step 3: Force Specificity on Each Abstraction For each abstraction: what are the actual, specific instances behind it? Name them. Quote them if possible. Specify who, when, what exactly.
Step 4: Recover Ignored Background Details What is present in the situation but not described — treated as taken-for-granted background? List these. They are often invisible because everyone assumes they are known.
Step 5: Surface Absences as Details What should be there but isn't? Absence is a detail. A missing response, a skipped step, a field left blank — these are observations, not gaps in data.
Step 6: Read What the Specifics Reveal Now that you have the specifics: what do they show that the abstractions concealed? What changes about your understanding?
Before proceeding, use the AskUserQuestion tool. State your interpretation of the situation in 1–2 sentences — what is being analyzed and what the core question is — then ask:
Proceed based on their selection. If the user reframes, incorporate the correction before running any analysis.
| Abstraction | Specific Instances Behind It |
|---|---|
| "users are frustrated" | [exact quote / behaviour / timestamp] |
| ... | ... |
Paragraph summary: how does the specific picture differ from the abstract one? What new questions or insights emerge?
This skill is most useful immediately before a decision, a diagnosis, or a design choice — the moment when abstractions are about to drive action. Getting specific at that point can prevent expensive errors.
After delivering this output, use AskUserQuestion to offer the next move:
/s4h-sensory-signal-detection — Detect signals in the mined details/s4h-writing-scene-construction — Use the mined details in scene construction/s4h-aesthetic-pattern-detection — Detect aesthetic patterns in the details