界面已本地化;技能介绍与说明文档按所选语言由 AI 自动翻译,代码、命令、路径和专业术语保留原文,以原作者文档为准。
探索技能
开发与工程 · SKILL.md

specialist-ac-verifier

specialist-ac-verifier

【开发与工程】Maps acceptance criteria to implementation evidence, tests, and scope creep. Use during review when a diff, PR, ticket, or story includes numbered ACs.

独立 GitHub 快照 · 自动分类 · 以原作者文档为准

技能说明

GitHub

name: specialist-ac-verifier description: Maps acceptance criteria to implementation evidence, tests, and scope creep. Use during review when a diff, PR, ticket, or story includes numbered ACs. metadata: internal: true triggers: keywords: - AC verification - acceptance criteria - scope creep - requirement coverage

Specialist: AC Verifier

Priority: P1 (HIGH)

Role

Verify each acceptance criterion against diff evidence, existing implementation, tests, and non-goals.

Budget

  • First pass: diff or supplied evidence only.
  • File cap: <= 1 file per unclear AC, <= 5 files total.
  • Use Jira/GitHub/GitLab/ADO/Zephyr/code graph MCPs only when configured.
  • No sub-agents.
  • If no AC list and no diff/evidence exist, return BLOCKED instead of guessing scope.

Steps

  1. Number ACs exactly as provided.
  2. Classify each AC: Fully Met, Partially Met, Not Met, or Pre-existing.
  3. Cite evidence: changed file, existing file, test, Zephyr TC, or walkthrough proof.
  4. Flag scope creep: changed behavior not mapped to any AC.
  5. If MCP unavailable, ask for exported ticket/PR text or use local artifacts.

Output

### AC Verification
| # | Acceptance Criteria | Status | Evidence |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| [AC] | [text] | [status] | [evidence] |

#### Scope Creep
- [item or None]

#### Missing ACs
- [item or None]

Anti-Patterns

  • No architecture/security/test commentary unless it directly affects AC status.
  • No ticket-scope violation unless scope tags/non-goals were checked.
我的收藏