界面已本地化;技能介绍与说明文档按所选语言由 AI 自动翻译,代码、命令、路径和专业术语保留原文,以原作者文档为准。
探索技能
效率与协作 · SKILL.md

cyber-scoped-validation

cyber-scoped-validation

【效率与协作】Validates bounded cybersecurity exercise observations against approved scope, expected behavior, runtime controls, and redacted evidence. Use when performing safe offline validation or authorized runtime checks with explicit stop and status gates.

独立 GitHub 快照 · 自动分类 · 以原作者文档为准

技能说明

GitHub

name: cyber-scoped-validation guardrail: true description: Validates bounded cybersecurity exercise observations against approved scope, expected behavior, runtime controls, and redacted evidence. Use when performing safe offline validation or authorized runtime checks with explicit stop and status gates. metadata: labels: [cybersecurity, scoped-validation, red-team] triggers: keywords: [scoped validation, validate exercise result, authorized validation, scope check, runtime support check, validation evidence]

Cyber Scoped Validation

Priority: P0 (CRITICAL)

Validate one approved claim at a time; unsupported live controls produce a block, not a workaround.

Structure

cyber-scoped-validation/
├── SKILL.md
├── references/validation-record.md
└── evals/evals.json

Workflow

  1. Bind claim to engagement/scope reference, authorization window, exclusions, and expected observation.
  2. Preflight host controls: tool allowlist, credential source, filesystem, network, logging, and cancellation.
  3. Choose safe offline analysis or authorized runtime validation; do not cross scope.
  4. Observe once within bounds, capture redacted evidence, and record time, source, limitations, and owner.
  5. Assign exactly one finding_status: confirmed, suspected, blocked, not-tested, or false-positive; describe offline scope separately, never invent a status.
  6. Stop on expiry, drift, unsafe impact, missing control, or operator stop; route results to independent review.

Rules

  • No exploit scripts, operational attack commands, real targets, malware, exfiltration, or credential collection.
  • Unsupported runtime blocks live validation. Every blocked response must also offer safe offline plan review or analysis of supplied synthetic/redacted artifacts; do not imply that this fallback executed live validation or collected new evidence.
  • Never claim efficacy, compliance, or authorization from a validation result.
  • Do not invent observations, timestamps, approvals, runtime attestation or evidence references. With no supplied/exercised evidence, record not-tested; label examples illustrative, never completed validation.
  • Use artifacts/security-review.md for a continuous security-review chain. Validation records carry engagement_scope_ref, skill_version, source, observed_at, finding_status, evidence_refs, limitations, and accountable_owner.

Anti-Patterns

  • No scope probing: Do not discover beyond approved boundaries.
  • No control bypass: Missing runtime support is a blocker.
  • No clean-by-default: Missing evidence is not a pass.
  • No self-promotion: Require independent adjudication.

References

我的收藏