计划执行与检查节点
executing-plans
按既定实施计划完成工作,保持过程检查和反馈。
video-packaging【效率与协作】Package a video: title and thumbnail-text pairs that never repeat words, or critique them. "why is no one clicking this video"
独立 GitHub 快照 · 自动分类 · 以原作者文档为准
Packaging decides whether a video gets watched; the content only decides whether it deserved to be. On every video surface the viewer sees two elements at once — the title and the thumbnail text — and the craft is that they must do different jobs:
A video idea earns discovery one of two ways, and the packaging differs:
| Intent | How it is found | Packaging consequence |
|---|---|---|
| Search | Typed queries; ranks over months | Title leads with the query phrasing (front-load the keyword); thumb adds the differentiator vs the other results |
| Browse | Suggested/home feeds; spikes on click-through | Title can spend more of its length on intrigue; thumb carries the pattern-break |
| Both | Rare; usually a search topic with a browse-worthy angle | Package for search, let the thumb do the browse work |
No search or browse logic → not a video idea yet. Route it back through topic development before spending packaging effort on it. For search-intent videos, pull the real query phrasing from /digital-marketing-pro:keyword-research rather than guessing it.
Input: the topic or concept, the brand, target platform, intent if known.
# Video packaging — [topic]
**Discovery intent:** Search / Browse / Both — [the reasoning in one line]
## Pair 1 — [angle: curiosity / benefit / identity]
**Title:** [≤60 chars where possible — what survives truncation comes first]
**Thumb text:** [1-3 words]
**Why they pair:** [the different jobs, and how they combine into one click decision]
## Pair 2 — [different angle]
## Pair 3 — [different angle]
## Recommendation
[Which pair leads and why — grounded in the intent tag, not taste]
## A/B note
[Which single element to vary if testing — never both at once]
Input: an existing title and/or thumbnail text (works from a screenshot description too).
# Packaging critique — [the draft]
## Verdict: PASS / FIX / FAIL
## The pairing check
[Do title and thumb do different jobs? Quote any echoed words — each is the
finding, verbatim.]
## Working
[What earns its place]
## Not working
[Specific, quotable problems — vague titles, buried keywords, thumb text
restating the title, curiosity with no clarity]
## 3 fixed pairs
[Revised packages, same content, same claims — packaging never promises what
the video does not deliver]