界面已本地化;技能介绍与说明文档按所选语言由 AI 自动翻译,代码、命令、路径和专业术语保留原文,以原作者文档为准。
探索技能
开发与工程 · SKILL.md

playtest

playtest

【开发与工程】Playtest a studio's game the way Homie holds its own games to a bar — real browsers on a computer and a phone held both ways, the first ten seconds timed, the look measured (black or flat frames, contrast, detail), how much of the screen the UI covers, the game's real sound captured and measured, a round played with one person trying and one doing no…

独立 GitHub 快照 · 自动分类 · 以原作者文档为准

技能说明

GitHub

name: playtest description: Playtest a studio's game the way Homie holds its own games to a bar — real browsers on a computer and a phone held both ways, the first ten seconds timed, the look measured (black or flat frames, contrast, detail), how much of the screen the UI covers, the game's real sound captured and measured, a round played with one person trying and one doing nothing, the owner control tests and two strangers finishing a round — then a blind review by a fresh reviewer that never saw the code, and a ranked list of what is weak. Use when someone asks to playtest, test, review, critique or judge a game, asks what is weak or what to fix next, before calling a game finished or publishing it, and after every change that should make it better.

Apps: For a business, venue, cause or customer app, follow the app skill: apps/<id>/app.json, one morphing screen, roles and parts. Reuse these engines and workflows; do not impose game rounds, scores, bots, a game demo or page navigation. The app check proves shared actions and reconnect; app stores use the same standalone command.

Playtest a game

The question is never "does it run". It is: would a stranger who pressed Play stay for a whole round, and come back? Instruments measure what can be measured; a fresh reviewer who never saw the code answers the rest. A builder never grades its own work.

One script: scripts/playtest.mjs in this skill's folder (Claude Code: node "${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/skills/playtest/scripts/playtest.mjs" <command>), run from inside the studio. It needs Node 22, Chrome and the studio's @homie-rocks/studio (for puppeteer-core and its checks). It opens at most two browsers at a time, all muted: nothing plays out loud.

For rules games, build first: the guard, strict types and deterministic play check must pass before Chrome opens. Both online browsers are replicas of a server host; killing the first browser tests continuity, not host election. Use the real predicted pose in the probe, never fake movement or scores. Test local movement with 150 ms delay and also verify hits, scores, turns and results agree after authority arrives. A turn game, quiz or live app needs its actual buttons and workflow exercised: movement-only rows do not prove it works, and an app has no required game round. Use the app check for shared actions and reconnect. Report inapplicable rows honestly, and add a manual two-browser trial of the requested mechanic.

1. Run the site and the instruments

Start the site as a background task that outlives the command (Claude Code: the Bash tool's run_in_background), wait until the play page answers, then:

npm run dev                                     # background: http://127.0.0.1:8787 (another port: npx --no-install homie-studio dev --port <n>)
node <playtest.mjs> run <game id> --url http://127.0.0.1:8787

It takes five to ten minutes; poll its output, never end your turn while it runs, and do not rebuild while it runs (a rebuild under npm run dev can stop the dev server). --only first,look,ui,sound runs some rows; --seconds 30 plays longer. The live site works too (--url the studio's address). Stop the site afterwards with npx --no-install homie-studio dev --stop.

rowwhat it doesfails when
first <device>opens the play page like a stranger on a computer, a phone, a phone on its side, and times four separate things: a seat, the page's first paint (the loading card, not the game), the loading cover lifting, and the first picture of the game itself (cover gone, the game's own frames advancing); frames per second; the GPUno seat, a cover that never lifts, or no picture of the game in 10 s
move <device>waits for a live round and a body that is the player's, then presses right and times the body moving; when nothing moves it presses left too and reports both, with the position, round phase and time left at each pressthe body answers after 1.5 s, or neither way moves it in a live round. WARN when only the opposite way moved (a wall on that side looks like this). BLOCKED when no press fit inside a live round with a free body
look <device>plays like a person (holds a direction most of a second, sometimes the action, changes its mind) and shoots the screen: brightness, contrast, colour, visible detail, black or one-colour frames, holes where nothing drew, frames that did not changea black or one-colour frame, pure-black holes; WARN for dark, flat, featureless or still frames
ui <phone>waits for active play, holds the thumb on the stick, hides the world, paints the page black then white, and counts what stays: the share of the screen the DOM UI covers and what is opaque in the middle third. Both frames are saved with the game's state at eachover 12% covered, or anything opaque in the middle, during active play. N/A when the screen was the results card, a spectator view, the loading cover or a browser cut off from its room (measured, labelled, not judged by that bar). BLOCKED when the game changed state between the two frames. WARN when it would pass and a DOM HUD element sits under one of the play page's own controls (the room button, the server or chat pill, the banner): the row names the element and the control
soundcopies what the game sends to its speaker while it is played (no autoplay flag: the real first-touch rule); loudness overall and through a phone speaker, true peak, clipping, gaps, whether each action press answers with a sound, whether music startedsilence, clipping; WARN for quiet, gaps, actions without sound, what a phone loses
playa computer plays (direction holds and the game's primary action) and a phone does nothing, in the same public room, for a round that starts after both are in: places, scores, round length against game.json, lead changes, and which inputs the script really pressedno round finishes; WARN when doing nothing scores as well as playing, everyone ties, or a bot is far ahead (a measured gap in one scripted round, never "people cannot win")
controlsthe owner tests from homie-studio port check: hold a direction 5 s (one straight line, the camera's yaw moves under 10°), alternate directions 10 s (every press goes the pressed way), real touch on Android Chrome (and iPhone WebKit when Playwright's WebKit is installed; otherwise that row says skip), the first browser closing (server continuity; host election only for older games), a late joiner, the big screen, audio unlock, errorsany of them (port skill: references/CHECKS.md says what each failure usually means)
roundhomie-studio check: two fresh browsers press Play, meet in one room and both see a round finish with both of them in the results; reconnects are reported beside completionthey do not. WARN when the round finished and a browser reconnected on the way
errorsuncaught errors and failed requests seen along the wayany uncaught error

BLOCKED is never PASS. A browser rendering at a few frames a second (a software renderer, a machine under heavy load) makes any game look stuck: the rows say BLOCKED and judge nothing. Run again on a quieter machine. "Could not test" and "tested and fine" must never sound the same. The same goes for the instrument's own faults: a screenshot decoder that does not finish in 20 s is stopped, that device's rows say BLOCKED, the browser is closed and the run exits non-zero; a site address this computer's Node.js cannot look up (a browser may still open it) stops the run as BLOCKED, "network preflight failed, before any page or game was opened" (the words check, perf and port check use for it too), and offers the local site. N/A means the row did not apply to what was on screen. One scripted run is one run: report a gap as measured once, and repeat before concluding.

What the game tells the instruments

Every press and every picture is recorded with the game's state, read from its port probe (exposePort, the port skill) and the play page: round phase and time left, whether the body is the player's to steer (busy), where it is. A game with no probe still runs, and its rows say the phase was unknown. Three optional things make the rows sharper; none is required:

  • In exposePort(net, { extra: { ... } }): alive: () => boolean (false: spectating until the next round), mode: () => string (the control mode on screen), loadout: () => string (what the player holds, when it changes which controls show), touchHeld: () => boolean, and drawCalls / triangles (renderer.info.render.calls / .triangles: the look row then reports measured runtime scene cost, which is not the asset inventory's estimate).

  • In game.json, the primary action, so a shooter is played by firing and not by the space bar:

    "playtest": { "primary": { "label": "fire",
      "computer": { "mouse": "left" },
      "phone": { "selector": "[data-action=fire]" } } }
    

    computer is { "key": "<KeyboardEvent.code>" } or { "mouse": "left|right|middle", "at": [x, y] }; phone is { "selector": "<css, in the game's frame>" } or { "region": [x, y, w, h] } (fractions of the screen). Undeclared, the script presses the space bar and taps a fixed spot, says that was a guess, and qualifies anything it concludes from the scores. It does not aim.

  • In game.json, "scoring": "together": every result row carries the room's one shared total, so the play row marks the active-against-idle comparison not applicable.

The UI row measures DOM coverage only. A HUD, labels or hints drawn inside the canvas are hidden with the world and are not checked for coverage or overlap; REPORT.md says so beside the result.

The UI row also lays the game's visible DOM HUD against the play page's own controls, which the page draws over the game's frame and reports as window.__shell.rects (the game reads the same as net.shell / net.on('shell')). A HUD element under a control that stays is a WARN with both named; under the "N playing" chip, which fades, it is a note. Fix it by laying the HUD out around net.shell's rectangles, or by moving the page's controls (game.json screen.share, screen.chat). A page that reports no layout (an older studio) is said to be unchecked.

A reading taken while the browser was not in its room is labelled, never judged as play: the helper's link (window.__homieNet.link, and window.__shell.link.state) says reconnecting, alone (the room never answered; an older browser-hosted game may play locally), offline or closed, and a press, a picture or a UI frame sampled then is BLOCKED or N/A with "CUT OFF from its room" in its state. The round row says a browser "was seen cut off" beside completion.

The run writes .playtest/<game>/<time>/ in the studio (added to .gitignore): REPORT.md, report.json, contact sheets (sheet-desk.png, sheet-phone.png, sheet-phone-landscape.png), every screenshot (the UI row's pair as *-ui-on-black.png and *-ui-on-white.png), sound-capture.wav and its spectrogram, and the owner-test receipts. Open the contact sheets and look at every picture before believing any number.

2. The blind review

For a rules game with maxSpeed 0 on every player kind, the toolkit marks the movement probe stationary. First-move rows say N/A and directional owner tests say not applicable, never PASS. Exercise its actual choices/taps/turns in two browsers and measure local feedback separately from authoritative acceptance. Do not add movement, fake pose samples or a board-direction probe to silence a check. A hold entirely inside a hiding countdown, death or stun is blocked evidence. Wait for an active, steerable phase and repeat the real controls in both browsers; record that directed result beside the generic row. Keep the mechanic and honest busy/alive probes; never remove a freeze or disguise it to turn a row green.

node <playtest.mjs> review .playtest/<game>/<time>

It writes REVIEW.md in that folder: a brief for a FRESH reviewer, with the pictures, the numbers and a rubric.

An outside review is optional, only when requested. Finish local checks and your own visual review without an extra question. When an outside review is requested, it hands screenshots outside this session: use the authorization already given, or ask once if the destination was not specified. The command prints approval: one self-contained question naming every file it sends (REVIEW.md, report.json and the listed pictures), the report folder they come from, and the destination (name it with --to "<the reviewer>": a subagent in this session, or an external command such as a second coding agent). For a requested outside review without prior destination consent, ask that question once. One yes covers that report folder and that reviewer; another folder or reviewer is a new question. review-request.json in the folder keeps the same list. A host that reviews what an agent sends may still refuse the transfer: that is the host's decision. Do not rephrase and retry it, and do not send the pictures another way. Then one of:

  • node <playtest.mjs> review <folder> --local writes REVIEW-LOCAL.md: the same rubric for this session to score the contact sheets itself. Nothing leaves the session. It is the builder grading its own build, so it is labelled not independent everywhere, and you say so in the first sentence when you report it. Read that brief and every listed picture, follow its JSON rubric and write VERDICT.json with "review": "local" in this exact run folder BEFORE calling reviewed --kind local. The reviewed command records a verdict; it does not create one. Rubric parts use 0–10; the overall JSON score and --score use 0–100 (for example, an overall seven out of ten is --score 70, not 7).
  • Record what happened, always: node <playtest.mjs> reviewed <folder> --kind independent --by "<who>", --kind local --reason "<why>", or --kind none --reason "<why>". REPORT.md and report <folder> then say which review this run had. With no record, or none, the review line is BLOCKED: a missing review never reads as a passed one. Hand its WHOLE TEXT, unchanged, to a reviewer that has not seen the code, the plan or your summary (Claude Code: the Agent tool with the file's full contents as the prompt, never just its path or your summary of it; Codex: a new session). Add nothing about what you built or changed. It plays the game itself, scores it 0-100 in eight parts, and returns gaps ranked by impact, each with evidence it saw and one concrete fix. Its verdict outranks yours. Put it in the run folder as VERDICT.json.

Comparing against other games (the person's references, the studio's last version, a game they admire): give the reviewer frames of each under shuffled labels, scored before the labels are revealed. A reference is a bar ("is it as good as that"), never a template ("make it look like that").

A game with models: give the reviewer the style board, the golden images and the lineup pictures (homie-studio assets lineup <id>, in .studio/art/<id>/) beside the frames, and add one question: "does every frame look like ONE game?" (1-10, naming outliers). Record it with homie-studio assets review <id> --score <n> --outliers <ids>.

3. Say what is weak

Lead with the numbers and the review, most important first: what fails, then what the reviewer would fix first. Group findings by cause before proposing work (five complaints about flat shapes are one missing lighting model, not five jobs). Name the one change that would matter most. Then, if the person wants, fix it and run the same instruments again; a change that does not measure better than the version before it is a regression, not progress. When the weak thing is speed (a low frame rate in first, a slow first ten seconds, a phone that struggles), the perf skill measures it properly: frame times and CPU per frame for player browsers (server tick work is separate), alternating runs, and only changes that beat the noise. When the weak thing is how a move feels (a hit that does not land, a floaty jump), the lab skill compares the change with the last commit frame by frame, with the person.

references/METHOD.md has the method behind the rows: playing like a person, the five numbers a round owes you, the scenarios, seats with different strategies, the do-nothing test, the ten-second test, and the traps that make an instrument lie.

Never

  • Never call a game good, fixed or finished from the code, a build that passed, or your own look at it.
  • Never report a local review as a blind one, and never read a BLOCKED or N/A row, or a missing review, as a pass.
  • Never turn one scripted round into a rule ("people cannot win", "input does not matter"): say what was measured, and run it again.
  • Never call the builder's local verdict an independent review: an independent reviewer is fresh every time.
  • Never script a player to make a number look good; the instruments play like a person on purpose.
  • Never leave a room open on a live site: the playtest's browsers leave when it ends; do not start more than two browsers of your own beside it.
我的收藏