界面已本地化;技能介绍与说明文档按所选语言由 AI 自动翻译,代码、命令、路径和专业术语保留原文,以原作者文档为准。
探索技能
开发与工程 · SKILL.md

review-session

review-session

【开发与工程】Review what changed in this session with RepoPilot before claiming work is done or that tests pass. Use after edits to tests, CI config, auth, or request handling, and whenever you are about to say "all tests pass".

独立 GitHub 快照 · 自动分类 · 以原作者文档为准

技能说明

GitHub

name: review-session description: Review what changed in this session with RepoPilot before claiming work is done or that tests pass. Use after edits to tests, CI config, auth, or request handling, and whenever you are about to say "all tests pass".

Review the session with RepoPilot

RepoPilot compares the repository with the snapshot taken when this session started. It is deterministic and local: the same change gives the same answer.

  1. Run repopilot review --since-snapshot.

  2. Read Decision, then the Definitely sensitive and Maybe sensitive lists.

  3. For every integrity.* signal — a focused, skipped, or removed test, a test that lost assertions, or a new suppression — either restore the check or state plainly in your reply why the change is intended. A green test run does not answer these signals: the run is what changed.

  4. For security signals (auth check removed, untrusted input reaching a sink), confirm the guard still exists on that path or fix it.

  5. Treat behavioral.quiet-fallback-introduced as a review candidate, not proof of harm. Inspect the caught operation and returned fallback, and preserve recovery behavior when it is intentional. This medium-confidence signal does not block the review gate.

Do not report the work as complete while a weakened check or a removed safeguard is open and unexplained. Other sensitive signals, such as a changed workflow or dependency, are context for the reviewer: mention them, but they do not need to be undone.

我的收藏