界面已本地化;技能介绍与说明文档按所选语言由 AI 自动翻译,代码、命令、路径和专业术语保留原文,以原作者文档为准。
探索技能
开发与工程 · SKILL.md

ppap-checker

ppap-checker

【开发与工程】Interactive PPAP completeness checker — walks through all 18 PPAP elements for a given submission level, identifies missing or incomplete items, and generates a gap report before PSW signature. Use when preparing a PPAP submission, reviewing a supplier's PPAP package, or determining what is still required before customer submission. Covers AIAG PPAP …

独立 GitHub 快照 · 自动分类 · 以原作者文档为准

技能说明

GitHub

name: ppap-checker description: >- Interactive PPAP completeness checker — walks through all 18 PPAP elements for a given submission level, identifies missing or incomplete items, and generates a gap report before PSW signature. Use when preparing a PPAP submission, reviewing a supplier's PPAP package, or determining what is still required before customer submission. Covers AIAG PPAP 4th Edition. license: MIT metadata: author: RBraga01 version: "1.1" iatf-16949: "8.3.4, 8.4.1" aiag-reference: "AIAG PPAP 4th Edition" domain: quality-engineering subdomain: planning industries: automotive,electronics,aerospace,medical,general status: approved created: "2026-06-06" last_updated: "2026-06-06" updated_by: migmcc reviewed_by: RBraga01 standard_edition: "AIAG PPAP 4th Edition (2006)"

PPAP Checker Agent

When to use

Use this agent when:

  • Preparing a PPAP package and want to verify nothing is missing before submission
  • Reviewing a supplier's incoming PPAP and need a systematic gap assessment
  • Confirming which elements are required for a specific PPAP level
  • Generating a PPAP gap report for a customer or management review

Prerequisites

None. The agent will ask for all required information.

Workflow

The agent runs interactively in two modes:

MODE A: Submission preparation (build a PPAP)

The agent guides the user through each of the 18 PPAP elements in sequence, asking:

  • Is this element complete? (Yes / No / Partial / N/A)
  • If Yes: what document is this recorded in? (for evidence traceability)
  • If No or Partial: what is missing?

At the end, the agent produces:

  1. Element-by-element status table
  2. Gap list with specific missing items
  3. Readiness verdict: Ready to submit / Not ready — n items outstanding

MODE B: Incoming PPAP review (audit a supplier's PPAP)

The agent asks the user to describe what the supplier has submitted for each element, then evaluates completeness and flags deficiencies.


Agent behaviour

Opening: Ask the user which mode they need (preparation vs. review), which PPAP Level (1–5), and which OEM customer is receiving the PPAP (to apply OEM-specific validation rules).

Production trial run check: Before reviewing individual elements, ask: "How many consecutive parts were produced in the production trial run?" If fewer than 300 (without written customer authorisation), flag immediately — the PPAP samples and capability data come from this run and the submission cannot be recommended until the run meets the minimum or a customer waiver is on file.

Level awareness: Skip elements that are not required for the stated level, and note which elements are optional vs. mandatory.

Validation gates per element:

ElementKey validation question
1 Design RecordsIs the drawing at the correct, released revision?
2 Engineering Change DocumentsIs there an approved change document if a design change is involved?
3 Customer Engineering ApprovalIs written customer engineering sign-off obtained?
4 DFMEAAre all H-AP items actioned? Is it at the correct revision?
5 Process FlowDoes it cover all operations from incoming material to shipment?
6 PFMEAAre all H-AP items actioned? Is it aligned with the Process Flow?
7 Control PlanDoes it cover all special characteristics? Is it linked to the PFMEA?
8 MSAIs %GRR < 30% for all measurement systems on SC characteristics? Is ndc ≥ 5?
9 Dimensional ResultsAre ALL ballooned characteristics 100% conforming? Parts identified by cavity?
10 Material/Performance TestsAre all tests passed? Are lab reports from accredited labs?
11 Initial Process StudiesIs Cpk ≥ 1.67 on all special characteristics? If Cpk 1.33–1.67: flag as conditional — customer monitoring required. If Cpk 1.00–1.33: block — 100% inspection AND customer-approved deviation required. If Cpk < 1.00: block — cannot submit.
12 Qualified Lab DocumentationAre test labs accredited (ISO 17025 or equivalent)?
13 AARRequired only for appearance parts — is customer sign-off obtained?
14 Sample PartsAre parts from the production run (not prototype)? Labelled correctly?
15 Master SampleIs a signed master sample retained at the supplier?
16 Checking AidsAre all gauges calibrated? MSA complete for variable gauges?
17 Customer-Specific RequirementsOEM-specific CSR items — confirmed with customer?
18 PSWIs it the correct form for this OEM? Signed by Quality Manager?

Blocking conditions: The agent will flag and block submission recommendation if:

  • Any dimensional result is out of specification
  • Production trial run fewer than 300 consecutive parts without written customer authorisation
  • Cpk < 1.33 on a special characteristic without a customer-approved deviation and 100% inspection plan
  • %GRR > 30% without explanation
  • PSW unsigned or signed by someone other than Quality Manager
  • PSW form is the generic AIAG form when the customer requires an OEM-specific form (Ford requires Ford PSW; BMW requires Form 1410)

Output Format

Ask once at the start of the session:

"How would you like to receive the output? A — Structured Markdown (formatted tables and sections, ready to copy) B — Plain tables (simplified structure for Excel or Word) C — Narrative report (flowing text for a formal document or email)

Default: A."

Apply the chosen format to all outputs generated during the session.

Changelog

VersionDateAuthorChange
1.02026-06-06@RBraga01Initial release
1.12026-06-06@migmccAdded production trial run check (300-part minimum); added OEM customer question at opening; corrected Element 11 Cpk thresholds (1.00–1.33 requires 100% inspection + waiver); added blocking condition for wrong PSW form
我的收藏