界面已本地化;技能介绍与说明文档按所选语言由 AI 自动翻译,代码、命令、路径和专业术语保留原文,以原作者文档为准。
探索技能
开发与工程 · SKILL.md

grc-third-party-risk-diagram

grc-third-party-risk-diagram

【开发与工程】Use when creating a draw.io diagram for vendor intake, tiering, questionnaires, security/privacy/legal review, contracting, and ongoing monitoring in a GRC, security, audit, compliance, privacy, cloud, or risk context.

独立 GitHub 快照 · 自动分类 · 以原作者文档为准

技能说明

GitHub

name: grc-third-party-risk-diagram description: Use when creating a draw.io diagram for vendor intake, tiering, questionnaires, security/privacy/legal review, contracting, and ongoing monitoring in a GRC, security, audit, compliance, privacy, cloud, or risk context. allowed-tools: Write, Bash, Read, WebFetch

GRC third-party risk diagram

Use this skill to structure the GRC content and visual pattern for vendor intake, tiering, questionnaires, security/privacy/legal review, contracting, and ongoing monitoring. Then use the drawio skill to generate the native editable .drawio file and optional PNG/SVG/PDF export.

Common Requests

  • new vendor intake
  • security questionnaire workflow
  • vendor tiering
  • DPIA handoff
  • continuous vendor monitoring

Recommended Elements

Include these when relevant:

  • business owner
  • procurement
  • legal
  • privacy
  • security
  • vendor
  • approver
  • artifacts
  • tiering decisions

Recommended Output Pattern

Produce a Vendor lifecycle, swimlane workflow, or tiering decision tree. Choose a layout that matches the audience:

  • Executive: compact lifecycle/capability view with business impact labels.
  • Auditor/assessor: explicit evidence, owner, control, cadence, and scope labels.
  • Practitioner/engineering: operational systems, data paths, automation, failure/exception paths, and implementation detail.

draw.io Instructions

  1. Load and follow the drawio skill.
  2. Generate native mxGraphModel XML directly. Do not generate Mermaid as the final artifact.
  3. Use descriptive lowercase hyphenated filenames.
  4. Include a legend when colors, edge styles, or containers have compliance meaning.
  5. Validate XML well-formedness before finalizing.
  6. If PNG/SVG/PDF is requested, export with embedded diagram XML when the draw.io CLI is available.

Visual Conventions

  • Blue: systems, platforms, services, and automated collectors.
  • Green: implemented controls, approvals, validated evidence, and compliant outcomes.
  • Orange/red: risks, findings, exceptions, overdue items, gaps, and failed controls.
  • Gray: manual tasks, external parties, optional steps, and out-of-scope areas.
  • Dashed containers: audit scope, trust boundaries, authorization boundary, or responsibility boundary.
  • Solid edges: primary process or system flow.
  • Dashed edges: evidence or attestation flow.
  • Dotted edges: optional, manual, exception, or escalation flow.

Quality Bar

  • Make ownership explicit.
  • Label regulated data, control IDs, frameworks, and evidence repositories when known.
  • Show decision criteria where the process branches.
  • Avoid generic boxes like "Compliance" without a role, system, artifact, or action.
  • Prefer editable source of truth over screenshots.
我的收藏