技能创建器
skill-creator
创建、改进和评估自定义技能,把专业流程转化为可重复使用的 AI 能力。
pre-trial-report【数据与研究】Drafts objective pre-trial reports for insurance carriers in personal injury defense litigation. Covers liability analysis, damages evaluation, venue/jury analysis, cost projections, expert testimony, settlement recommendations, and trial outcome predictions (~60 days before trial). Use when preparing carrier pre-trial reports, defense trial assessme…
独立 GitHub 快照 · 自动分类 · 以原作者文档为准
name: pre-trial-report language: en description: Drafts objective pre-trial reports for insurance carriers in personal injury defense litigation. Covers liability analysis, damages evaluation, venue/jury analysis, cost projections, expert testimony, settlement recommendations, and trial outcome predictions (~60 days before trial). Use when preparing carrier pre-trial reports, defense trial assessments, or settlement recommendation memos. tags:
Produces a structured, objective pre-trial report to an insurance carrier with honest risk assessment and actionable settlement/trial recommendations.
PRE-TRIAL REPORT
TO: [Claims Manager Name and Title]
[Insurance Company]
FROM: [Attorney Name], [Firm Name]
DATE: [Current Date]
RE: [Insured] v. [Plaintiff]
[Court and Case Number]
Policy No: [Number] | Claim No: [Number]
Date of Loss: [Date] | Trial Date: [Date]
Draft each section. Be direct — acknowledge weaknesses, quantify risks, avoid over-promising.
| # | Section | Key Content |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Introduction | Purpose, timeline (~60 days out), developments since last report |
| 2 | Trial Logistics | Trial date, duration estimate, judge, remaining deadlines |
| 3 | Factual Summary | Chronological, evidence-supported; flag disputed facts |
| 4 | Venue & Jury Analysis | Historical verdict data, jury demographics, comparable verdicts |
| 5 | Judge & Opposing Counsel | Judge tendencies, ruling patterns; counsel trial record and style |
| 6 | Costs & Fees | Incurred to date; projected trial costs (attorney, experts, exhibits, post-trial) |
| 7 | Motions Practice | Completed motions and impact; pending (especially MSJ); planned MILs |
| 8 | Liability Analysis | Elements plaintiff must prove with evidence strength; comparative negligence %; affirmative defenses |
| 9 | Damages Analysis | Use damages table below |
| 10 | Expert Testimony | Both sides — qualifications, expected testimony, credibility, impeachment |
| 11 | Party Presentation | Plaintiff credibility, deposition performance; defendant witness quality |
| 12 | Surveillance & Impeachment | Footage inconsistencies, social media, medical contradictions, witness conflicts |
| 13 | Trial Outcome Predictions | Defense verdict % with reasoning; verdict range (low/mid/high) if plaintiff prevails |
| 14 | Settlement Recommendations | Current posture, recommended range with reasoning, timing |
| 15 | Final Recommendations | Overall assessment, cost-benefit, clear trial-vs-settle recommendation with timeline |
| Category | Amount/Range | Evidence Strength | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|
| Past medical expenses | $ | Gap treatment, causation | |
| Future medical expenses | $ | Expert support, speculative elements | |
| Past lost wages | $ | Documentation quality | |
| Future earning capacity | $ | Vocational expert opinions | |
| Pain & suffering | $ | Comparable awards in venue | |
| Loss of enjoyment | $ | Jury appeal factors | |
| Pre-existing conditions | — | Apportionment arguments |
Defense Verdict Likelihood: ___%
If Plaintiff Prevails:
Low: $___ Mid: $___ High: $___
Comparative Fault Offset: ___%
Recommended Settlement Range: $___ – $___