界面已本地化;技能介绍与说明文档按所选语言由 AI 自动翻译,代码、命令、路径和专业术语保留原文,以原作者文档为准。
探索技能
开发与工程 · SKILL.md

insurance-construction

insurance-construction

【开发与工程】Analyze, draft, and review Insurance clauses for Construction contracts. Use when the user mentions insurance clause, coverage requirements, construction insurance, or asks to review, redline, or generate this clause type. Returns structured risk assessment, plain-language summary, and suggested alternative language.

独立 GitHub 快照 · 自动分类 · 以原作者文档为准

技能说明

GitHub

name: insurance-construction description: > Analyze, draft, and review Insurance clauses for Construction contracts. Use when the user mentions insurance clause, coverage requirements, construction insurance, or asks to review, redline, or generate this clause type. Returns structured risk assessment, plain-language summary, and suggested alternative language.

Insurance Clause -- Construction

This skill provides expert-level analysis and drafting assistance for Insurance clauses in Construction contracts.


When to Activate

Activate this skill when the user:

  • Uploads or pastes a contract containing a Insurance clause
  • Asks to draft, redline, or improve a Insurance clause
  • Asks for a risk assessment of an existing Insurance provision
  • Mentions keywords: insurance clause, coverage requirements, construction insurance

Workflow

Step 1 -- Intake

Ask the user (if not already provided):

  1. Which party are you representing? (e.g., vendor, client, buyer, seller)
  2. Jurisdiction governing the contract? (e.g., New York, California, England & Wales)
  3. Is this a draft for review or should I generate fresh language?

Step 2 -- Analysis

If reviewing existing language, output the following structure:

## Insurance Clause Analysis

### Plain-Language Summary
[2-3 sentence plain-English description of what the clause does]

### Key Provisions Identified
- [Provision 1]
- [Provision 2]

### Risk Assessment
| Item | Risk Level | Notes |
|------|-----------|-------|
| [item] | High / Medium / Low | [explanation] |

### Recommended Redlines
[Specific suggested changes with rationale]

### Market Standard Comparison
[How this clause compares to typical Construction market standard]

Step 3 -- Drafting

If generating new language, produce:

  1. Balanced version (neither party-favored)
  2. Favorable to client version
  3. Negotiation notes -- what the other side will likely push back on

Insurance Playbook -- Construction

See scripts/playbook.md for detailed clause-specific guidance, fallback positions, jurisdiction-specific notes, and precedent language.


Important Notes

  • Always caveat that output is not legal advice and should be reviewed by qualified counsel.
  • Flag any provisions that may be unenforceable or jurisdiction-specific.
  • When jurisdiction is unknown, apply general common-law principles and note assumptions.
我的收藏