技能创建器
skill-creator
创建、改进和评估自定义技能,把专业流程转化为可重复使用的 AI 能力。
cybersecurity-compliance【数据与研究】Use when identifying cybersecurity-specific regulations and incident reporting obligations. Covers NIS2, DORA, SEC cyber disclosure rules, CISA incident reporting, state breach notification laws, cyber insurance requirements, and security certification frameworks. USE FOR: NIS2, DORA, SEC cybersecurity rules, CISA, breach notification, incident repor…
独立 GitHub 快照 · 自动分类 · 以原作者文档为准
name: cybersecurity-compliance description: | Use when identifying cybersecurity-specific regulations and incident reporting obligations. Covers NIS2, DORA, SEC cyber disclosure rules, CISA incident reporting, state breach notification laws, cyber insurance requirements, and security certification frameworks. USE FOR: NIS2, DORA, SEC cybersecurity rules, CISA, breach notification, incident reporting, SOC 2, ISO 27001, cyber insurance, FedRAMP, StateRAMP, CMMC, data breach response DO NOT USE FOR: implementing security controls (use security skills), security testing tools (use security/security-testing), general data privacy (use privacy-data-protection) license: MIT metadata: displayName: "Cybersecurity Compliance" author: "Tyler-R-Kendrick" compatibility: claude, copilot, cursor references:
Disclaimer: This skill provides general educational information about legal topics relevant to software development. It is not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always consult a qualified attorney licensed in the relevant jurisdiction before making legal decisions for your organization.
Cybersecurity is no longer just a technical concern — it is a regulated activity. Mandatory incident reporting, board-level accountability, and third-party risk requirements are expanding globally. Organizations that experience a cyber incident face not only the technical challenge of response and recovery but also a complex web of legal obligations with strict timelines. Failure to comply with these obligations can result in penalties that compound the damage of the underlying incident. Understanding your reporting obligations, certification requirements, and insurance coverage before an incident occurs is essential.
| Regulation | Jurisdiction | Scope | Key Requirements | Effective |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| NIS2 Directive | EU | Essential + important entities across 18 sectors | Risk management measures, 24hr incident reporting, supply chain security, board accountability | October 2024 |
| DORA | EU | Financial entities + ICT providers | ICT risk management, incident reporting, resilience testing, third-party risk management | January 2025 |
| SEC Cyber Disclosure Rules | US | Public companies | Material incident disclosure within 4 business days on Form 8-K, annual risk management disclosure | December 2023 |
| CISA Incident Reporting (CIRCIA) | US | Critical infrastructure | 72hr incident reporting, 24hr ransomware payment reporting | Rules being finalized |
| State Breach Notification Laws | US (all 50 states) | Organizations with residents' data | Notification to affected individuals + state AG within specified timeframes | Varies by state — some as short as 30 days |
| PSTI Act | UK | Consumer IoT devices | No default passwords, vulnerability disclosure policy, defined support period | April 2024 |
| CER Directive | EU | Critical entities | Risk assessment, resilience measures, incident notification | October 2024 |
One of the most critical aspects of cybersecurity compliance is understanding how quickly you must report an incident and to whom. These timelines begin running from the moment you become aware of the incident, making rapid detection and assessment capabilities essential.
| Jurisdiction / Law | Timeline | Notify Whom | Trigger |
|---|---|---|---|
| GDPR | 72 hours | Supervisory authority + data subjects if high risk | Personal data breach |
| NIS2 | 24hr early warning + 72hr notification + 1 month final report | CSIRT / competent authority | Significant incident |
| HIPAA | 60 days | HHS + individuals + media if >500 affected | PHI breach |
| SEC | 4 business days | SEC on Form 8-K | Material cybersecurity incident |
| California | Expedient, without unreasonable delay | AG + individuals | Personal information breach |
| Australia | 30 days assessment + notification | OAIC + individuals | Eligible data breach |
Key considerations:
Many customers, partners, and regulators require evidence of your security posture through formal certifications or audit reports. Choosing the right framework depends on your market, customer base, and regulatory environment.
| Framework | Type | Scope | Who Needs It |
|---|---|---|---|
| SOC 2 | Audit report (Type I or Type II) | Service organizations | SaaS vendors selling to enterprises |
| ISO 27001 | Certifiable international standard | Any organization | Global enterprises, particularly in EU and APAC |
| FedRAMP | US federal government authorization | Cloud services for federal agencies | US government contractors and cloud providers |
| StateRAMP | State government authorization | Cloud services for state/local government | State and local government contractors |
| CMMC | DoD certification (Levels 1-3) | Defense contractors | US defense supply chain |
| TISAX | Automotive industry certification | Automotive supply chain | Automotive suppliers and partners |
| HDS | Healthcare hosting certification | Healthcare data hosting in France | Organizations hosting healthcare data in France |
SOC 2 vs. ISO 27001: SOC 2 is dominant in North America and focuses on controls relevant to service organizations (security, availability, processing integrity, confidentiality, privacy). ISO 27001 is more widely recognized internationally and provides a certifiable information security management system (ISMS). Many organizations pursue both.
FedRAMP: If you sell cloud services to US federal agencies, FedRAMP authorization is effectively mandatory. The process is rigorous and can take 12-18 months. FedRAMP Rev 5 aligns with NIST SP 800-53 Rev 5 controls. The FedRAMP authorization boundary must be clearly defined and all components within it must meet the required control baselines (Low, Moderate, or High).
CMMC: The Cybersecurity Maturity Model Certification is required for Department of Defense contractors. CMMC 2.0 simplified the model to three levels: Level 1 (foundational, self-assessment), Level 2 (advanced, third-party assessment for critical programs), and Level 3 (expert, government-led assessment). Level 2 aligns with NIST SP 800-171.
Cyber insurance has become an important component of organizational risk management, and insurers are increasingly prescriptive about the security controls they require.
What cyber insurance typically covers:
Common insurer requirements:
Insurers increasingly require specific security controls as a condition of coverage. Failure to maintain these controls can void your policy or result in claim denial:
Premium factors: Premiums are influenced by industry, revenue, data volume, security maturity, claims history, and the specific controls you have in place. Organizations with strong security postures and certifications (SOC 2, ISO 27001) often receive more favorable terms.
Multiple regulations now legally require organizations to maintain and test an incident response plan. Beyond regulatory compliance, a well-prepared incident response capability dramatically reduces the cost and impact of security incidents.
Regulations requiring incident response plans:
Key components of a compliant incident response plan:
Critical legal consideration: Involve legal counsel at the start of any incident response, not at the end. Communications during incident response may be discoverable in subsequent litigation or regulatory proceedings. Structuring the response under attorney-client privilege can protect sensitive assessments and recommendations.