界面已本地化;技能介绍与说明文档按所选语言由 AI 自动翻译,代码、命令、路径和专业术语保留原文,以原作者文档为准。
探索技能
文档与办公 · SKILL.md

preservation-letter

preservation-letter

【文档与办公】Drafts litigation hold and document preservation letters under FRCP 37(e) and state equivalents. Covers custodian identification, ESI scope, hold implementation, and spoliation warnings. Use when sending preservation notices, litigation hold letters, spoliation notices, or evidence preservation demands.

独立 GitHub 快照 · 自动分类 · 以原作者文档为准

技能说明

GitHub

name: preservation-letter language: en description: Drafts litigation hold and document preservation letters under FRCP 37(e) and state equivalents. Covers custodian identification, ESI scope, hold implementation, and spoliation warnings. Use when sending preservation notices, litigation hold letters, spoliation notices, or evidence preservation demands.

Preservation Letter

Drafts a formal preservation notice establishing the opposing party's duty to preserve evidence, tailored to the matter's custodians, data sources, and time period.

Prerequisites

Gather before drafting:

  1. Case identification — parties, caption/docket (if filed), or anticipated claims
  2. Key facts — relevant dates, transactions, events establishing the dispute
  3. Known custodians — individuals likely possessing relevant information
  4. Data sources — IT systems, communication platforms, cloud services, retention policies
  5. Temporal scope — preservation start date through present

Quick Start

Format as formal business correspondence: letterhead, date, recipient block (name/title/org/address), re-line with matter description.

Required Sections

SectionContent
Opening NoticeCounsel, client, dispute nature. If filed: caption, court, docket. If pre-suit: state client reasonably anticipates litigation. Cite FRCP 37(e) or state equivalent.
Matter DescriptionFactual context sufficient for recipient to identify custodians and sources. Do not disclose litigation strategy.
Preservation ScopeCategorized instructions per scope table below
Implementation InstructionsLitigation hold procedures per checklist below
Spoliation ConsequencesLegal consequences of non-compliance
Response RequirementsWritten acknowledgment deadline (5–10 business days), hold confirmation, contact info
ClosingFormal closing, signature block with bar admissions

Preservation Scope Categories

Include only categories applicable to the dispute:

CategoryExamples
PaperContracts, memoranda, notes, financials, invoices, drafts
Electronic commsEmail, texts, IMs, social media, voicemails — all platforms/devices including personal if used for business
ESIDocuments, spreadsheets, databases, presentations, calendars — native format with metadata intact
Cloud/storageCloud services, shared drives, backups, archived data, servers, mobile devices
PhysicalProducts, equipment, machinery, vehicles (if applicable)
Audio/visualRecordings, photos, videos, surveillance footage

Key emphasis: metadata must be preserved intact; no format conversions; personal devices/accounts included if used for business.

Litigation Hold Checklist

Instruct recipient to:

  • Suspend all routine destruction, auto-deletion, email purging, and retention schedules immediately
  • Issue written hold notice to all custodians by name and position
  • Direct IT to disable auto-deletion, preserve backups, protect systems from data-destructive maintenance
  • Preserve all newly created documents relating to the matter
  • Maintain records of all preservation efforts
  • Continue hold until matter resolved or written release provided

Spoliation Consequences

Address with appropriate firmness:

  • FRCP 37(e) sanctions: monetary penalties through adverse inference instructions
  • Dismissal or default judgment in egregious cases
  • Contempt findings
  • Sanctions apply even for negligent destruction; intentional destruction risks punitive sanctions and criminal liability
  • Routine business practices are not a defense once litigation is reasonably anticipated

Pitfalls and Checks

  • Scope calibration — omit inapplicable categories (e.g., no physical evidence in a pure contract dispute)
  • No strategy disclosure — provide enough context for compliance, nothing more
  • Ongoing duty — emphasize preservation is continuous, not one-time
  • Questions ≠ delay — state that scope questions do not excuse or delay compliance
  • Temporal scope — define explicitly with start and end dates
  • Jurisdiction — default to federal (FRCP 37(e)); adapt to state rules if specified
  • Tone — professional courtesy with unmistakable firmness
  • Citations — verify all case law and statutory references; mark uncertain ones with [VERIFY]
我的收藏