界面已本地化;技能介绍与说明文档按所选语言由 AI 自动翻译,代码、命令、路径和专业术语保留原文,以原作者文档为准。
探索技能
文档与办公 · SKILL.md

negotiation-support

negotiation-support

【文档与办公】Generates a strategic negotiation support document with leverage analysis, BATNA assessment, risk matrix, and issue-by-issue tactical planning. Use when preparing for settlement conferences, mediations, contract negotiations, deal structuring, or dispute resolution strategy sessions.

独立 GitHub 快照 · 自动分类 · 以原作者文档为准

技能说明

GitHub

name: negotiation-support language: en description: >- Generates a strategic negotiation support document with leverage analysis, BATNA assessment, risk matrix, and issue-by-issue tactical planning. Use when preparing for settlement conferences, mediations, contract negotiations, deal structuring, or dispute resolution strategy sessions. tags:

  • analysis
  • memo
  • litigation
  • transactional

Negotiation Support

Strategic negotiation roadmap synthesizing case materials into leverage analysis, risk assessment, and tactical recommendations.

Prerequisites

  1. Matter context — parties, relationship history, negotiation type (settlement / contract / transactional / dispute resolution)
  2. Documents — contracts, correspondence, prior agreements, discovery, financials
  3. Client objectives — goals, constraints, authority limits, timeline
  4. Negotiation history — prior offers, counteroffers, impasses, tentative agreements

Quick Start

  1. Gather prerequisites above.
  2. Produce each output section in order (Executive Summary through Action Items).
  3. Cite source documents for every factual claim.
  4. Mark unconfirmed legal authority with [VERIFY].
  5. Label the document as privileged work product.

Output Structure

1. Executive Summary

ElementContent
Negotiation typeSettlement / contract / transactional / dispute resolution
PartiesNames, roles, relationship summary
Core objectivesClient's 3–5 primary goals, ranked
Critical issuesTop issues driving negotiation
Recommended strategyIntegrative vs. distributive; approach in 2–3 sentences
Key recommendationSingle most important strategic action

2. Factual Background

Chronological narrative with cited sources covering:

  • Relationship history and negotiation genesis
  • Key dates, amounts, communications, commitments
  • Prior negotiation attempts and outcomes
  • Current procedural posture or deal status

3. Interests & Positions Analysis

ClientOpposing Party
Stated positionsWhat they demandWhat they demand
Underlying interestsEconomic, operational, reputational, relationalSame categories (estimated)
ConstraintsAuthority, timeline, regulatoryLikely constraints
PrioritiesRank order of issuesEstimated rank order
Pressure pointsInternal deadlines, stakeholder demandsLikely pressures

4. Leverage Assessment

Rate each factor High / Medium / Low for both sides:

Leverage TypeClientOpposing Party
Legal — claims strength, precedent, contractual position
Economic — resources, market position, alternatives
Informational — asymmetric knowledge, discovery exposure
Timing — deadlines, limitations periods, market windows
Relational — ongoing relationship value, reputation

5. BATNA Analysis

ClientOpposing Party (est.)
Best alternative
Likely outcome if no deal
Cost of no deal
Timeline of alternative
Risks of alternative
Reservation pointMinimum acceptableEstimated walk-away
Target outcomeAspirational realistic goal

6. Risk Matrix

RiskTypeLikelihoodImpactMitigation
Legal / Business / StrategicH/M/LH/M/LSpecific action

Flag categories: litigation exposure, regulatory concerns, contractual weaknesses, reputational damage, precedent-setting risk, relationship damage.

7. Issue-by-Issue Plan

For each significant issue:

IssueOpeningTargetWalk-AwayValue to UsValue to Them
H/M/LH/M/L

Identify for each issue:

  • Trade opportunities — low-cost concessions that are high-value to the other side
  • Package proposals — bundled combinations that create value
  • Sequencing — optimal order to address issues

8. Tactical Recommendations

Approach: integrative vs. distributive rationale, anchoring strategy, concession pattern (graduated / reciprocal / contingent), framing.

Anticipated arguments & responses:

Opposing ArgumentResponseSupporting Authority / Facts
Cite documents, precedent, statutory provisions

Process recommendations:

  • Confidentiality protocol (NDA, FRE 408 / settlement privilege)
  • Stakeholder involvement and escalation triggers
  • Documentation protocol for offers and tentative agreements
  • Expert input needs (financial, technical, industry)

9. Action Items

ActionOwnerDeadlinePriority
Pre-session preparations
Information to gather
Stakeholder decisions needed
Analysis to complete

Include negotiation timeline with milestones.

Guidelines

  • Candid assessment — acknowledge weaknesses; do not overstate leverage.
  • Cite sources — tie every factual claim to specific materials reviewed.
  • Jurisdiction-aware — flag rules affecting negotiation (FRE 408, state settlement privilege, mandatory mediation).
  • Confidentiality — mark as privileged work product; note attorney-client privilege applicability.
  • Actionable specificity — tailor every recommendation to the matter facts; no generic advice.
  • Authority verification — mark unconfirmed authority with [VERIFY].
  • Living document — revise as new information emerges during negotiation.

Troubleshooting

  • Missing client authority limits: Flag gap and request before drafting BATNA reservation points.
  • Sparse opposing-party information: Mark estimated fields explicitly; recommend discovery or informal information-gathering steps.
  • Multi-party negotiation: Duplicate the Interests & Leverage tables per party; note coalition dynamics.
  • Cross-jurisdictional matters: Identify each jurisdiction's settlement privilege rules separately; flag conflicts.

我的收藏