视觉画布设计
canvas-design
基于设计原则创作静态视觉作品,用于海报与品牌图形。
negotiation-support【文档与办公】Generates a strategic negotiation support document with leverage analysis, BATNA assessment, risk matrix, and issue-by-issue tactical planning. Use when preparing for settlement conferences, mediations, contract negotiations, deal structuring, or dispute resolution strategy sessions.
独立 GitHub 快照 · 自动分类 · 以原作者文档为准
name: negotiation-support language: en description: >- Generates a strategic negotiation support document with leverage analysis, BATNA assessment, risk matrix, and issue-by-issue tactical planning. Use when preparing for settlement conferences, mediations, contract negotiations, deal structuring, or dispute resolution strategy sessions. tags:
Strategic negotiation roadmap synthesizing case materials into leverage analysis, risk assessment, and tactical recommendations.
[VERIFY].| Element | Content |
|---|---|
| Negotiation type | Settlement / contract / transactional / dispute resolution |
| Parties | Names, roles, relationship summary |
| Core objectives | Client's 3–5 primary goals, ranked |
| Critical issues | Top issues driving negotiation |
| Recommended strategy | Integrative vs. distributive; approach in 2–3 sentences |
| Key recommendation | Single most important strategic action |
Chronological narrative with cited sources covering:
| Client | Opposing Party | |
|---|---|---|
| Stated positions | What they demand | What they demand |
| Underlying interests | Economic, operational, reputational, relational | Same categories (estimated) |
| Constraints | Authority, timeline, regulatory | Likely constraints |
| Priorities | Rank order of issues | Estimated rank order |
| Pressure points | Internal deadlines, stakeholder demands | Likely pressures |
Rate each factor High / Medium / Low for both sides:
| Leverage Type | Client | Opposing Party |
|---|---|---|
| Legal — claims strength, precedent, contractual position | ||
| Economic — resources, market position, alternatives | ||
| Informational — asymmetric knowledge, discovery exposure | ||
| Timing — deadlines, limitations periods, market windows | ||
| Relational — ongoing relationship value, reputation |
| Client | Opposing Party (est.) | |
|---|---|---|
| Best alternative | ||
| Likely outcome if no deal | ||
| Cost of no deal | ||
| Timeline of alternative | ||
| Risks of alternative | ||
| Reservation point | Minimum acceptable | Estimated walk-away |
| Target outcome | Aspirational realistic goal |
| Risk | Type | Likelihood | Impact | Mitigation |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Legal / Business / Strategic | H/M/L | H/M/L | Specific action |
Flag categories: litigation exposure, regulatory concerns, contractual weaknesses, reputational damage, precedent-setting risk, relationship damage.
For each significant issue:
| Issue | Opening | Target | Walk-Away | Value to Us | Value to Them |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| H/M/L | H/M/L |
Identify for each issue:
Approach: integrative vs. distributive rationale, anchoring strategy, concession pattern (graduated / reciprocal / contingent), framing.
Anticipated arguments & responses:
| Opposing Argument | Response | Supporting Authority / Facts |
|---|---|---|
| Cite documents, precedent, statutory provisions |
Process recommendations:
| Action | Owner | Deadline | Priority |
|---|---|---|---|
| Pre-session preparations | |||
| Information to gather | |||
| Stakeholder decisions needed | |||
| Analysis to complete |
Include negotiation timeline with milestones.
[VERIFY].