界面已本地化;技能介绍与说明文档按所选语言由 AI 自动翻译,代码、命令、路径和专业术语保留原文,以原作者文档为准。
探索技能
效率与协作 · SKILL.md

letter-of-intent

letter-of-intent

【效率与协作】Drafts corporate Letters of Intent for M&A and business transactions, structuring binding vs. non-binding provisions, deal terms, exclusivity, and confidentiality. Use when drafting LOIs, preliminary term sheets, deal memoranda, or pre-definitive agreement correspondence.

独立 GitHub 快照 · 自动分类 · 以原作者文档为准

技能说明

GitHub

name: letter-of-intent language: en description: Drafts corporate Letters of Intent for M&A and business transactions, structuring binding vs. non-binding provisions, deal terms, exclusivity, and confidentiality. Use when drafting LOIs, preliminary term sheets, deal memoranda, or pre-definitive agreement correspondence.

Letter of Intent (LOI)

Formalizes preliminary deal terms between parties contemplating a corporate transaction, balancing binding and non-binding provisions. Targets U.S. transactions — flag cross-border elements for additional counsel review.

Prerequisites

Gather before drafting. Ask focused questions for any missing items.

  1. Parties — legal names, entity types, authorized signatories
  2. Transaction type — acquisition, merger, asset purchase, investment, partnership
  3. Economics — price/amount, payment structure, timing
  4. Timeline — due diligence period, target closing, exclusivity duration
  5. Contingencies — financing, regulatory approvals, third-party consents
  6. Prior documents — term sheets, correspondence, NDAs (if any)

Document Sections

SectionContent
HeaderDate, recipient, subject: "Letter of Intent – Proposed [Transaction Type]"
OpeningParty identification, transaction purpose, deal description
Transaction OverviewAssets/equity/units involved, deal structure
Principal TermsSee checklist below
Binding/Non-Binding DesignationExplicit non-binding statement with binding carve-outs
ConfidentialityStandalone provision or NDA cross-reference
ExclusivityNo-shop period, scope, duration, breach consequences
Governing ProvisionsGoverning law, good-faith obligation, termination/expiration
Signature BlocksAuthorized reps, titles, counterpart/e-signature authorization

Principal Terms Checklist

Draft with enough specificity to show serious intent; note definitive agreements will elaborate.

  • Purchase price / investment amount
  • Payment structure and timing (cash, stock, seller note, earnout)
  • Proposed closing date and flexibility conditions
  • Transaction cost allocation
  • Key reps and warranties expected in definitive agreements
  • Material conditions precedent to closing
  • Post-closing obligations (earnouts, non-competes, indemnification)
  • Break-up or termination fees (if any)

Binding vs. Non-Binding Provisions

Typically BindingTypically Non-Binding
Confidentiality obligationsPurchase price and payment terms
Exclusivity / no-shopRepresentations and warranties
Cost/expense allocationClosing conditions
Governing law / disputesPost-closing covenants
Non-binding designation clauseTimeline targets

Key Provisions

Confidentiality

If no separate NDA exists, include a binding section covering:

  • Scope of confidential information
  • Permitted uses (solely evaluating the transaction)
  • Permitted disclosures (advisors, lenders — bound by same obligations)
  • Duration (typically 18–24 months post-termination)
  • Return/destruction of materials if transaction fails

If a separate NDA exists, cross-reference it and confirm it survives the LOI.

Exclusivity

  • Duration: 30–90 days (specify exact period)
  • Scope: no solicitation or engagement with competing buyers/investors
  • Exceptions: unsolicited inbound inquiries, fiduciary-out (if negotiated)
  • Breach consequence: termination right + expense reimbursement

Pitfalls and Checks

  • Label every provision as binding or non-binding — ambiguity creates unintended obligations
  • Include good-faith covenant to negotiate definitive agreements with a target date; state failure to reach terms creates no liability beyond breach of binding provisions
  • Confirm governing law with user — default to target's state of organization or primary transaction jurisdiction
  • Don't over-detail — avoid full indemnification mechanics or rep schedules that belong in definitive documents; the LOI frames expectations, it doesn't replace the purchase agreement
  • Tone — professional and direct; accessible to legal and business readers; avoid adversarial framing
  • Include counterpart/e-signature authorization language

Key changes made:

  • Description: Tightened to focus on what it does + clear trigger, removed tags (not in the spec's required frontmatter)
  • Removed redundant prose: Cut the overview paragraph's repetition of the description; collapsed verbose section headers
  • Flattened structure: Merged the "Confidentiality Provision Template" and "Exclusivity Provision" code blocks into concise bullet lists under a single "Key Provisions" section
  • Consolidated guidelines → "Pitfalls and Checks": Matches the recommended skill body pattern; each item is actionable and terse
  • Removed code fences around list content that didn't need them (confidentiality and exclusivity were wrapped in unnecessary code blocks)
  • Shortened throughout: ~96 lines down from ~96, but with significantly less visual noise and better signal density per token

Want me to try writing the file again, or would you like to copy this directly?

我的收藏