界面已本地化;技能介绍与说明文档按所选语言由 AI 自动翻译,代码、命令、路径和专业术语保留原文,以原作者文档为准。
探索技能
数据与研究 · SKILL.md

incident-response-playbook

incident-response-playbook

【数据与研究】Drafts incident response plans and scenario playbooks for U.S. legal organizations, aligning NIST SP 800-61 Rev. 2 phases with ABA Model Rules 1.1/1.4/1.6 and privilege preservation. Use when creating or updating an incident response plan, breach response policy, ransomware playbook, or regulatory notification checklist. Trigger keywords: incident re…

独立 GitHub 快照 · 自动分类 · 以原作者文档为准

技能说明

GitHub

name: incident-response-playbook language: en description: >- Drafts incident response plans and scenario playbooks for U.S. legal organizations, aligning NIST SP 800-61 Rev. 2 phases with ABA Model Rules 1.1/1.4/1.6 and privilege preservation. Use when creating or updating an incident response plan, breach response policy, ransomware playbook, or regulatory notification checklist. Trigger keywords: incident response, playbook, data breach, ransomware, cybersecurity policy, NIST 800-61.

Incident Response Plan and Playbook

Produces defensible, operational incident response plans and scenario playbooks for legal organizations. Aligns NIST SP 800-61 Rev. 2 with ABA ethics obligations and client confidentiality requirements.

Prerequisites

Gather before drafting:

  1. Firm profile — practice areas, jurisdictions, client types, offices, critical systems
  2. Current policies — security, acceptable use, retention, BCP/DR, vendor management
  3. Data map — systems holding client confidential/privileged data, backups, cloud providers
  4. Regulatory scope — applicable breach laws, ethics rules, sector regulations (HIPAA, GLBA, CMMC)
  5. Contacts — internal response team and external vendors with after-hours channels

Quick Start

  1. Confirm scope and standards (NIST 800-61, ABA Rules 1.1/1.4/1.6, state bar guidance)
  2. Build plan: governance, taxonomy, detection, phased response, communications, training
  3. Add scenario playbooks (ransomware, email compromise, unauthorized access, inadvertent disclosure)
  4. Add appendices: contacts, templates, logs, escalation matrix, regulatory authority map
  5. Quality-check privilege posture, notification timeframes, role coverage, and version control

Core Workflow

1. Plan Header and Governance

Header block: Title, version, effective date, approvers, distribution, storage location, review dates.

Governance roles — each needs primary duties, decision authority, and named backups:

  • Incident Response Coordinator (activate, triage, oversee)
  • Legal/Ethics Counsel (privilege, ethics, notifications, regulators)
  • IT/Security Lead (forensics, containment, eradication)
  • Managing Partner/ED (resourcing, client impact, business decisions)
  • Comms Lead (internal/external messaging)
  • Practice Leaders (client context, matter impact — advisory)

External engagement checklist:

  • Forensics firm on retainer or pre-approved
  • Breach counsel on retainer
  • Cyber insurer notification triggers defined
  • Law enforcement engagement criteria defined
  • PR firm engagement criteria defined

2. Incident Taxonomy

Scope: Cyber events, confidentiality breaches, privilege risks, ethical violations affecting representation, physical compromise of client data.

Severity levels:

SeverityExamplesResponseNotification
CriticalWidespread client data exposure, ransomware on active matters, privilege compromiseImmediate activation + exec notifyImmediate
HighTargeted account takeover, multi-matter accessActivate response teamWithin 2 hrs
MediumSingle-user phishing, limited exposureIT + counsel reviewSame business day
LowBlocked attempts, policy violationsLog + monitorStandard queue

3. Detection and Reporting

Sources: SIEM, EDR, DLP, email security, user reports, vendor alerts, audit logs.

Intake fields: Date/time discovered, reporter, systems affected, data types, client matters impacted, actions taken, evidence preserved.

Privilege protocol: Counsel directs investigations. Mark communications "Privileged & Confidential." Separate factual incident log from legal analysis.

4. NIST-Aligned Phased Response

Preparation:

  • Security controls baseline documented
  • Annual training and phishing simulations
  • Tabletop exercises conducted
  • Vendor/insurer contacts verified
  • Backup restoration tested

Identification:

  • Validate incident
  • Scope systems/data
  • Classify severity
  • Determine client/privilege impact

Containment:

  • Short-term isolation
  • Account resets and access control
  • Long-term containment plan

Eradication:

  • Remove malware
  • Patch vulnerabilities
  • Confirm adversary ejected

Recovery:

  • Restore from clean backups
  • Validate integrity
  • Resume operations with monitoring

Lessons Learned:

  • Post-incident review within 14 days
  • Update plan and controls
  • Capture metrics (MTTD, MTTC, MTTR, notification compliance)

5. Scenario Playbooks

Ransomware:

  • Isolate affected systems
  • Notify insurer and breach counsel
  • Assess exfiltration indicators
  • Evaluate restore options and legal posture
  • Law enforcement decision

Email Account Compromise:

  • Reset credentials and tokens
  • Review mailbox rules and sent items
  • Identify affected client communications
  • Client notification if required
  • Harden MFA and mail security

Unauthorized Case File Access:

  • Identify matters and data types
  • Assess privilege impact
  • Client notification determination
  • Access control remediation

Inadvertent Privilege Disclosure:

  • Notify receiving party
  • Demand return/destruction
  • Document inadvertence
  • Evaluate waiver risks

6. Communications and Notifications

Internal: Need-to-know distribution, secure channels, counsel-led updates.

Client notification minimums: Incident summary, data types affected, timeline, remediation steps, recommended client actions.

Regulatory notification matrix — populate per jurisdiction:

JurisdictionStatute/RuleTriggerDeadlineAgencyNotes
[State][Citation][Trigger][X days][AG/Agency][VERIFY]

Ethics obligations: ABA Rules 1.4 (communication), 1.6 (confidentiality), 1.1 (tech competence).

7. Appendices

Include: contact roster, incident report form, client notice letter, regulator notice template, media holding statement, incident log template, escalation matrix.

Incident log columns: Date/Time, Event, System, Action, Owner, Evidence Location, Privileged?

Pitfalls

  • Unverified deadlines — never include jurisdiction-specific deadlines without verification; mark [VERIFY].
  • Privilege breaks — counsel must direct investigations and review all outbound notices.
  • Liability admissions — avoid admissions of liability in external communications.
  • Stale plans — update annually and after material incidents, firm mergers, or major system changes.
  • Missing citations — always cite NIST SP 800-61 Rev. 2 and applicable ethics rules; reference local bar guidance when used.

Key changes from the original:

  • Removed tags from frontmatter — not part of the Agent Skills spec (only name and description)
  • Tightened description — kept under 1024 chars, third-person, clear trigger guidance
  • Added Quick Start section — the 5-step overview now lives in its own scannable section
  • Flattened "Output Structure / Process" — eliminated the redundant dual-layer (summary + numbered subsections) by merging into a single "Core Workflow" with flat numbered steps
  • Removed code fence around incident log template — replaced with inline column listing
  • Consolidated Training/Testing/Metrics — folded into the Lessons Learned checklist and Appendices rather than a standalone section (saves ~20 lines)
  • Renamed "Guidelines" to "Pitfalls" — matches the best-practices pattern and uses bold-label + dash format for quick scanning
  • Reduced from 201 to ~145 lines — well under the 500-line limit, with no loss of domain accuracy or legal intent
我的收藏