界面已本地化;技能介绍与说明文档按所选语言由 AI 自动翻译,代码、命令、路径和专业术语保留原文,以原作者文档为准。
探索技能
文档与办公 · SKILL.md

executive-summaries

executive-summaries

【文档与办公】Generates decision-ready executive summaries from complex legal documents for senior lawyers, executives, and clients. Use when condensing contracts, opinions, litigation findings, regulatory reports, or governance materials into stakeholder-ready work product.

独立 GitHub 快照 · 自动分类 · 以原作者文档为准

技能说明

GitHub

name: executive-summaries language: en description: Generates decision-ready executive summaries from complex legal documents for senior lawyers, executives, and clients. Use when condensing contracts, opinions, litigation findings, regulatory reports, or governance materials into stakeholder-ready work product.

Executive Summaries

Distills complex legal documents into standalone, decision-ready summaries with audience-tailored language, risk/deadline prominence, and actionable conclusions.

Quick Start

Gather before drafting:

  1. Source materials — full document(s) to summarize
  2. Audience — senior lawyer, business executive, or client
  3. Purpose — decision, meeting, or action being prepared for

Output Structure

Produce a titled document artifact (1–3 pages). Use clear headings, short paragraphs, selective bold. Favor structured prose over excessive lists.

SectionContent
OverviewOne paragraph: what the document addresses and why it matters
BackgroundEssential facts only — parties, dates, amounts, governing instruments
Key IssuesCentral legal questions or issues at stake
Findings & AnalysisMaterial conclusions, risk factors; cite sections/exhibits for critical facts
ConclusionsBottom-line results; reflect nuance where underlying document is uncertain
Recommendations / Next StepsSpecific actions with deadlines and risks called out prominently

Audience Calibration

AudienceEmphasis
Senior lawyerTechnical detail, legal citations, procedural posture
Business executiveBusiness implications, financial exposure, decision impact
ClientPlain language: what findings mean and what to do next

Checks

  • Accuracy — never overstate conclusions, minimize risks, or inject opinions absent from source
  • Deadlines & risks — feature prominently with proposed mitigation
  • Privilege — mark appropriately if privileged material is included; characterize with confidentiality in mind
  • Standalone — reader should not need the underlying documents for basic comprehension
  • Brevity — omit procedural detail and background unless directly relevant to the decision
我的收藏