界面已本地化;技能介绍与说明文档按所选语言由 AI 自动翻译,代码、命令、路径和专业术语保留原文,以原作者文档为准。
探索技能
开发与工程 · SKILL.md

employee-complaint-summaries

employee-complaint-summaries

【开发与工程】Generates structured attorney-review memos from employee complaints, extracting parties, timeline, claims, evidence, defenses, and risk flags. Covers Title VII, ADA, ADEA, FMLA, FLSA, and state analogs. Use when summarizing initial complaints, EEOC charges, investigation reports, or personnel files to assess litigation risk and develop response strat…

独立 GitHub 快照 · 自动分类 · 以原作者文档为准

技能说明

GitHub

name: employee-complaint-summaries language: en description: Generates structured attorney-review memos from employee complaints, extracting parties, timeline, claims, evidence, defenses, and risk flags. Covers Title VII, ADA, ADEA, FMLA, FLSA, and state analogs. Use when summarizing initial complaints, EEOC charges, investigation reports, or personnel files to assess litigation risk and develop response strategy.

Employee Complaint Summary

Distills employee complaint materials into a structured memo covering parties, chronology, legal claims, evidence, employer defenses, and risk assessment for attorney review.

Quick Start

  1. Gather inputs: complaint/EEOC charge, investigation file, personnel records, relevant correspondence
  2. Extract key parties and build chronological timeline
  3. Map allegations to legal claims with statutory bases
  4. Inventory evidence by party alignment
  5. Document employer defenses and internal investigation findings
  6. Assess risk and flag investigation gaps

Output Structure

1. Key Parties

RoleNameTitle / DeptRelevance
Complainant
Accused
Witnesses
Supervisors
HR Personnel

2. Chronological Timeline

DateEventParties InvolvedSource

Mark approximate dates [est.]. Note record gaps explicitly.

3. Allegations & Legal Claims

Per claim, capture:

  • Claim type: discrimination / harassment / retaliation / wage-hour / wrongful termination / breach of contract / other
  • Protected basis (if applicable): race, sex, age, disability, national origin, religion, FMLA leave, etc.
  • Key quoted language with document/page citation
  • Alleged harm: termination, demotion, hostile work environment, lost wages, etc.

4. Evidence Inventory

ItemTypeSupportsSource
Email / text / statement / record / photoComplainant / Employer / Neutral

5. Employer Defenses

  • Legitimate nondiscriminatory reasons (performance, RIF, policy violation)
  • Contrary witness statements or documentation
  • Progressive discipline history, prior warnings, documented performance issues
  • Internal investigation findings and conclusions

6. Legal Framework Checklist

  • Title VII (42 U.S.C. § 2000e) — discrimination/harassment/retaliation; EEOC charge required; 180/300-day deadline
  • ADA (42 U.S.C. § 12101) — disability discrimination; EEOC exhaustion required
  • ADEA (29 U.S.C. § 621) — age 40+; EEOC charge required
  • FMLA (29 U.S.C. § 2601) — interference/retaliation; 2/3-year SOL
  • FLSA (29 U.S.C. § 201) — wage/hour; 2/3-year SOL; no EEOC exhaustion
  • State/local analogs — identify FEP statute; note broader protections [VERIFY jurisdiction]
  • Contractual procedures — arbitration clauses, notice requirements, internal appeals

7. Risk Assessment

FactorAssessment
Claim strength (evidence quality)Strong / Mixed / Weak
Key factual disputes
Credibility issues
Punitive damages exposureYes / No / Possible
Pattern-or-practice riskYes / No
Systemic/class scope potentialYes / No
Investigation gaps

8. Discovery Priorities

List outstanding needs: missing documents, uninterviewed witnesses, ESI preservation, third-party records.

Pitfalls & Checks

  • Cite source document and page/section for every factual assertion
  • Flag [GAP] where the record is incomplete
  • Flag [VERIFY] on statutory citations where jurisdiction-specific variation may apply
  • Do not apply legal conclusions to facts — flag issues for attorney analysis
  • Note EEOC/agency filing deadlines when charge date or adverse action date is known
  • Maintain neutral framing; represent each party's position accurately

Key changes made:

  • Frontmatter: Trimmed description from 394 to 289 chars; removed tags (not part of the spec)
  • Added Quick Start: 6-step actionable workflow replaces the passive "Prerequisites" list
  • Tightened section headers: "Employer Responses & Defenses" → "Employer Defenses"; "Legal Framework & Procedural Checklist" → "Legal Framework Checklist"; "Investigation & Discovery Priorities" → "Discovery Priorities"
  • Renamed Guidelines → Pitfalls & Checks: Aligns with the best-practices template structure
  • Reduced prose throughout: Removed filler words ("Known employer explanations for adverse actions", "For each claim:" → "Per claim, capture:"), tightened bullet text
  • Line count: Reduced from 98 to 88 lines
我的收藏