界面已本地化;技能介绍与说明文档按所选语言由 AI 自动翻译,代码、命令、路径和专业术语保留原文,以原作者文档为准。
探索技能
数据与研究 · SKILL.md

background-check-summary

background-check-summary

【数据与研究】Summarizes raw background check data into structured executive reports with risk categorization (GREEN/YELLOW/RED). Use when processing criminal records, court filings, employment/education verification, sanctions screening, or adverse media for pre-employment screening, executive due diligence, or investment-grade investigations.

独立 GitHub 快照 · 自动分类 · 以原作者文档为准

技能说明

GitHub

name: background-check-summary language: en description: Summarizes raw background check data into structured executive reports with risk categorization (GREEN/YELLOW/RED). Use when processing criminal records, court filings, employment/education verification, sanctions screening, or adverse media for pre-employment screening, executive due diligence, or investment-grade investigations.

Background Check Summarization

Transforms raw background check data into a decision-ready summary with risk categorization and compliance flags. Output has three sections: executive summary, detailed findings, and methodology.

Quick Start

  1. Identify subject (name, DOB, SSN last 4, search scope)
  2. Categorize each check type as Pass / Flag / Pending
  3. Assign overall status: GREEN, YELLOW, or RED
  4. Surface top 2–3 findings and any compliance flags
  5. Append methodology and coverage limitations

Output Structure

Executive Summary

  • Subject: Full name, DOB, SSN (last 4), search scope
  • Overall Status: GREEN (clear) / YELLOW (requires review) / RED (adverse findings)
  • Category Table: Pass/Flag/Pending per check type
  • Key Findings: 2–3 most significant items
  • Compliance Flags: Jurisdiction-specific requirements

Detailed Findings

Present each category with findings or explicit "No records found":

CategoryKey Data Points
Criminal Records (Fed/State/County)Charges, disposition, date, jurisdiction, sentence
Sex Offender RegistryStatus, jurisdiction
Civil LitigationCase type, role, disposition, damages
Employment VerificationTitle (claimed vs. verified), dates, departure reason
Education VerificationDegree (claimed vs. verified), institution, dates
Professional LicensesStatus, disciplinary actions
Sanctions/WatchlistOFAC, BIS, state debarment
Adverse MediaSource, date, relevance assessment

Methodology & Limitations

State sources searched and gaps (jurisdictions not covered, sealed records, database lag).

Risk Categorization

StatusCriteriaAction
GREENNo adverse records, all verifications confirmedProceed
YELLOWMinor discrepancies, old/minor offenses, items needing contextHuman review required
REDSignificant adverse findings, verification failures, recent serious offensesEnhanced review / adverse action

Escalation Factors

  • Criminal: Felony; violence/fraud/theft-related; recency (<7 yrs); position relevance; pending charges
  • Employment: Title inflation; date gaps >3 months; overlapping employment; employer not found
  • Education: Degree or institution mismatch; unaccredited institution

Compliance Checks

  • FCRA: Adverse action requires pre-adverse notice, report copy, and Summary of Rights — always note this
  • Ban-the-Box / Fair Chance: Flag jurisdictions restricting criminal history inquiries at specific hiring stages
  • EEOC Guidance: Evaluate criminal history for nature of offense, time elapsed, and job-relatedness
  • State lookback limits: Note applicable 7-year or other reportable-record limitations
我的收藏