界面已本地化;技能介绍与说明文档按所选语言由 AI 自动翻译,代码、命令、路径和专业术语保留原文,以原作者文档为准。
探索技能
设计与创意 · SKILL.md

clickhouse-architecture-advisor

clickhouse-architecture-advisor

【设计与创意】MUST USE when designing ClickHouse architectures, selecting between ingestion or modeling patterns, or translating best practices into workload-specific system designs. Complements clickhouse-best-practices with decision frameworks and explicit provenance labels.

独立 GitHub 快照 · 自动分类 · 以原作者文档为准

技能说明

GitHub

name: clickhouse-architecture-advisor description: MUST USE when designing ClickHouse architectures, selecting between ingestion or modeling patterns, or translating best practices into workload-specific system designs. Complements clickhouse-best-practices with decision frameworks and explicit provenance labels. license: Apache-2.0 metadata: author: ClickHouse Inc version: "0.1.0"

ClickHouse Architecture Advisor

This skill adds workload-aware architecture decisioning on top of clickhouse-best-practices.

Official docs remain the source of truth. This skill must always prefer official ClickHouse documentation when available.

Required behavior

Before producing recommendations:

  1. Identify the workload shape
    • observability
    • security / SIEM
    • product analytics
    • IoT / telemetry
    • market data / financial services
    • mixed OLAP with point-lookups
  2. Read the relevant decision rule files in rules/
  3. Use mappings/doc_links.yaml to attach official documentation
  4. Classify every recommendation as:
    • official
    • derived
    • field
  5. Never present field guidance as official guidance
  6. If a recommendation is uncertain, say so explicitly

Provenance rules

official

Use this when the recommendation is directly backed by official docs.

derived

Use this when the recommendation is not stated verbatim in docs but follows logically from documented ClickHouse behavior.

field

Use this only for experience-based guidance that may be situational. When using field, include:

  • a disclaimer that the advice is heuristic
  • a relevant official doc if one partially applies
  • the reason the advice depends on workload context

Read these rule files by scenario

Real-time ingestion design

  1. rules/decision-ingestion-strategy.md
  2. rules/decision-real-time-preaggregation.md
  3. Relevant best-practices insert rules

Time-series and retention design

  1. rules/decision-partitioning-timeseries.md
  2. Relevant best-practices schema partition rules

Enrichment and dimension lookups

  1. rules/decision-join-enrichment.md
  2. Relevant best-practices query join rules

Mutable state / late-arriving events

  1. rules/decision-late-arriving-upserts.md
  2. Relevant best-practices mutation avoidance rules

Output format

Structure responses like this:

## Workload Summary
- workload:
- latency target:
- data shape:
- primary query patterns:
- operational constraints:

## Key Decisions
- ...
- ...

## Recommendations

### <Recommendation title>

**What**
...

**Why**
...

**How**
...

**Category**
official | derived | field

**Confidence**
high | medium | heuristic

**Source**
- doc link(s)

**Validation**
- concrete SQL, metric, or smoke test

Architecture-specific guidance

Prefer decision frameworks over generic advice. Good responses should:

  • explain tradeoffs
  • identify the likely operating bottleneck
  • separate immediate actions from structural redesign
  • provide target architecture patterns, not just isolated settings

Full reference

See AGENTS.md for the compiled version and examples/ for sample outputs.

我的收藏