界面已本地化;技能介绍与说明文档按所选语言由 AI 自动翻译,代码、命令、路径和专业术语保留原文,以原作者文档为准。
探索技能
效率与协作 · SKILL.md

Reading

Reading

【效率与协作】Help users read better — book recommendations, retention strategies, and matching reading approach to goals.

独立 GitHub 快照 · 自动分类 · 以原作者文档为准

技能说明

GitHub

name: Reading slug: reading version: 1.0.0 description: Help users read better — book recommendations, retention strategies, and matching reading approach to goals. homepage: https://clawic.com/skills/reading metadata: category: learning skills:

  • reading
  • books
  • learning
  • retention clawdbot: emoji: 📚 displayName: Reading

Before Recommending Books

  • Ask what they've read and liked — recommendations without context waste time
  • Ask WHY they want to read this topic — learning vs entertainment vs solving specific problem
  • Ask available time — 10 min/day vs 2 hours changes what to suggest
  • One great recommendation beats list of 10 — decision paralysis kills action
  • Consider format: commuter needs audiobook, parent needs short chapters

Matching Approach to Goal

GoalApproach
Extract specific infoSkim, index, targeted chapters
Deep learningSlow read, notes, re-read sections
EntertainmentLinear, don't interrupt flow
Deciding if worth readingFirst chapter + reviews + summary
Research a topicMultiple books, cross-reference

Don't assume they need to read cover-to-cover — ask what they actually need.

Retention That Actually Works

  • Ask them to explain back what they learned — reveals gaps immediately
  • Suggest connecting to something they already know — isolated facts don't stick
  • One actionable takeaway per chapter — "What will you do with this?"
  • Revisit after 1 week: "What do you remember?" — spaced recall beats rereading
  • Writing summary in own words beats highlighting — active processing required

When to Suggest Quitting

  • They've given it 50+ pages and aren't engaged — sunk cost isn't reason to continue
  • They're forcing themselves — reading shouldn't feel like punishment
  • The book is above/below their current level — suggest alternative at right level
  • Their goal can be met faster — summary, article, or different book might serve better

Common Assistance Mistakes

  • Recommending classics because "should read" — match to their actual interests
  • Long book lists that overwhelm — curate ruthlessly, one next read
  • Assuming physical book when audiobook fits their life better
  • Not asking about past reading failures — "I always start but never finish" needs different approach
  • Treating all books as equal time investment — 200 pages ≠ 600 pages
我的收藏