---

name: quality-standards description: Quality gate definitions, scoring rubrics, and acceptance criteria for the Agentic UI Designer system.

Quality Standards Reference

This skill defines the quality gates, scoring criteria, and acceptance standards that all designs must meet.

Quality Gates (95% MINIMUM)

All gates must pass for design completion:

Gate	Threshold	Weight	Mandatory
Minimum Iterations	>= 5	-	Yes
Maximum Iterations	<= 20	-	Yes
Overall Score	>= 9.5/10 (95%)	-	Yes
WCAG AA Compliance	100%	-	Yes
Vibe-Code Probability	< 1%	-	Yes
Critical Issues	0	-	Yes
Spatial Score	>= 9.0/10	25%	Yes
Color Score	>= 9.0/10	25%	Yes
Typography Score	>= 9.0/10	25%	Yes
Originality Score	>= 9.5/10	25%	Yes

Scoring Rubrics

Spatial Design (0-10)

Score	Description
9-10	Perfect grid adherence, masterful spacing relationships, balanced composition
7-8	Consistent grid usage, good spacing, minor alignment issues
5-6	Some grid violations, inconsistent spacing, noticeable balance issues
3-4	Frequent off-grid values, poor spacing relationships, unbalanced
1-2	No grid system, chaotic spacing, severely unbalanced

Key Checkpoints:

• All spacing values on 8pt grid (or 4pt for micro)
• Consistent spacing between similar elements
• Logical spacing hierarchy (related closer, unrelated farther)
• Proper alignment to grid columns
• Balanced visual weight distribution
• Effective use of whitespace

Color Design (0-10)

Score	Description
9-10	WCAG AAA, harmonious palette, strong emotional alignment, unique
7-8	WCAG AA, cohesive colors, appropriate mood, some customization
5-6	Minor contrast issues, acceptable harmony, generic choices
3-4	WCAG failures, clashing colors, wrong emotional tone
1-2	Multiple accessibility failures, no coherent palette

Key Checkpoints:

• All text/background combinations meet WCAG AA (4.5:1)
• UI components meet 3:1 contrast
• Color palette is harmonious (defined relationship)
• Colors evoke intended emotional response
• Colors are appropriate for sector
• Palette is not generic/default framework colors

Typography (0-10)

Score	Description
9-10	Perfect hierarchy, excellent readability, intentional pairing, flawless implementation
7-8	Clear hierarchy, good readability, appropriate fonts, minor issues
5-6	Adequate hierarchy, acceptable readability, basic font choices
3-4	Unclear hierarchy, readability issues, poor font choices
1-2	No hierarchy, unreadable, inappropriate fonts

Key Checkpoints:

• Clear visual hierarchy (size, weight, color)
• Font pairing is intentional and complementary
• Line length 50-75 characters
• Line height appropriate (1.4-1.6 for body)
• Minimum 16px for body text
• Consistent usage across similar elements
• Proper CSS implementation (rem, variables)

Originality (0-10)

Score	Description
9-10	Highly unique, no generic patterns, strong brand personality
7-8	Mostly original, minimal generic patterns, some personality
5-6	Some customization, recognizable generic patterns
3-4	Mostly generic, obvious AI patterns, no personality
1-2	Pure vibe-code, all defaults, completely generic

Key Checkpoints:

• No generic gradients (purple-blue, etc.)
• Layout patterns customized from stock
• Framework defaults modified
• Decorative elements are purposeful
• Real content (not placeholder)
• Distinct brand personality present

WCAG 2.1 Checklist

Level A (Must Pass)

Criterion	Description	Check
1.1.1	Non-text content has alt text	Images, icons
1.3.1	Info and relationships in markup	Semantic HTML
1.3.2	Meaningful sequence	DOM order matches visual
1.4.1	Color not sole indicator	Don't rely on color alone
2.1.1	Keyboard accessible	All functionality via keyboard
2.1.2	No keyboard trap	Can tab away from all elements
2.4.1	Bypass blocks	Skip links present
2.4.2	Page titled	Descriptive title
2.4.4	Link purpose clear	From link text or context
3.1.1	Language of page	lang attribute on html
4.1.1	Valid markup	No parsing errors
4.1.2	Name, role, value	ARIA where needed

Level AA (Should Pass)

Criterion	Description	Check
1.4.3	Contrast minimum	4.5:1 normal, 3:1 large
1.4.4	Resize text	Works at 200% zoom
1.4.5	Images of text	Avoid, use real text
2.4.6	Headings descriptive	Clear, meaningful
2.4.7	Focus visible	Clear focus indicators
3.2.3	Consistent navigation	Same order throughout
3.2.4	Consistent identification	Same function = same name

Level AAA (Recommended)

Criterion	Description	Check
1.4.6	Enhanced contrast	7:1 normal, 4.5:1 large
1.4.8	Visual presentation	Line length, spacing
2.4.9	Link purpose alone	Clear from link text only

Issue Classification

Critical (Blocks Deployment)

• WCAG Level A failures
• Color contrast below 3:1
• Broken core functionality
• Unreadable text
• Keyboard traps
• Missing skip links

High Priority (Fix Before Launch)

• WCAG Level AA failures
• Color contrast 3:1-4.5:1 (below AA)
• Significant layout issues
• Poor visual hierarchy
• Major spacing inconsistencies
• No focus indicators

Medium Priority (Fix Soon)

• Minor spacing issues
• Suboptimal color choices
• Typography tweaks
• Enhancement opportunities
• WCAG AAA suggestions

Low Priority (Nice to Have)

• Micro-interaction polish
• Animation refinements
• Advanced accessibility features
• Performance optimizations

Iteration Strategy

Explore Phase (Iterations 1-5)

• Try bold, different approaches
• Don't optimize prematurely
• Focus on overall direction
• MUST complete all 5 iterations even if gates pass early
• Use early passing to polish and exceed thresholds

Exploit Phase (Iterations 6-12)

• Refine the best approach
• Fix specific issues identified
• Optimize for quality gates
• Polish and perfect

Pivot Phase (Iterations 13-20)

• If stuck, try completely different direction
• Re-run research with new direction
• Reset assumptions
• Challenge previous decisions
• Consider alternative approaches

Score Calculation

Overall Score = (Spatial × 0.25) + (Color × 0.25) +
                (Typography × 0.25) + (Originality × 0.25)

Pass Criteria:
- Minimum iterations >= 5
- Overall >= 9.5 (95%)
- All dimensions >= 9.0
- Originality >= 9.5
- Vibe-code probability < 1%
- Critical issues = 0
- WCAG AA = 100%

Failure Patterns

Score Plateau

Detection: No improvement for 2+ iterations Action: Switch to Pivot strategy, try different approach

Recurring Issues

Detection: Same issues appear after "fixing" Action: Address root cause, not symptoms

Regression

Detection: Scores decreasing Action: Revert to previous best, analyze what broke

Dimension Imbalance

Detection: One dimension consistently low Action: Focused iteration on weak dimension