界面已本地化;技能介绍与说明文档按所选语言由 AI 自动翻译,代码、命令、路径和专业术语保留原文,以原作者文档为准。
探索技能
开发与工程 · SKILL.md

citlyze-prompt-audit

citlyze-prompt-audit

【开发与工程】Audit tracked prompts in Citlyze to find weak spots and coverage gaps. Use when asked "which prompts are underperforming", "audit my tracked prompts", "where are we invisible", or "what prompts should we track next". Requires the Citlyze MCP server.

独立 GitHub 快照 · 自动分类 · 以原作者文档为准

技能说明

GitHub

name: citlyze-prompt-audit description: Audit tracked prompts in Citlyze to find weak spots and coverage gaps. Use when asked "which prompts are underperforming", "audit my tracked prompts", "where are we invisible", or "what prompts should we track next". Requires the Citlyze MCP server. license: MIT metadata: author: Citlyze (https://www.citlyze.com)

Citlyze prompt audit

Review the prompt portfolio: find prompts where the brand is invisible, engines or locations that drag performance down, and intent gaps worth tracking next.

Prerequisites

The Citlyze MCP server must be connected (setup guide). Tools are read-only; adding or editing prompts happens in the app, not over MCP.

Workflow

  1. Inventory. Call list_prompts with active: true. Each prompt has query_id, query_text, intent, tier, topic, and prompt_group. Summarize the portfolio: counts by intent and topic.
  2. Baseline. Call get_visibility_overview for the latest completed window to know the brand's average per-engine performance.
  3. Drill into suspect prompts. For prompts the user cares about (or a sample of high-tier ones), call get_prompt_visibility with the query_id. Rows in by_engine_location break metrics down per engine and location; look for:
    • prompts with near-zero mention_rate everywhere (invisible)
    • prompts strong on one engine but absent on another (engine gap)
    • prompts that diverge sharply by location (localization gap) Read every conclusion alongside n_runs; thin run counts make weak evidence.
  4. Coverage gaps. Compare the prompt inventory against how buyers actually ask: are commercial-intent prompts ("best X for Y", "X vs Y", "X alternatives") represented for each core topic? Which competitor comparisons are missing? Which customer questions from the user's domain knowledge have no tracked prompt?
  5. Deliver:
    • Weak prompt table: prompt text, worst engine/location, mention rate, n_runs, suspected reason.
    • Suggested prompts to add (5-15), each with intent label and the reason it earns a slot. Remind the user to add them in the Citlyze app.

Interpretation rules

  • Treat intent, tier, topic, and prompt_group as the workspace's own labels; group by whatever values are present rather than assuming a fixed set.
  • Zero visibility on a prompt is not automatically bad tracking; it may be the honest baseline the user needs to see.

Learn more: Prompt results in Citlyze - citlyze.com

我的收藏