界面已本地化;技能介绍与说明文档按所选语言由 AI 自动翻译,代码、命令、路径和专业术语保留原文,以原作者文档为准。
探索技能
设计与创意 · SKILL.md

frontend-design

frontend-design

【设计与创意】Create distinctive, production-grade frontend interfaces with a clear visual direction while respecting project design specification constraints, existing design systems, and minimal-diff engineering boundaries. Use when building or restyling pages, landing screens, dashboards, marketing surfaces, or other frontend UI where visual quality materially …

独立 GitHub 快照 · 自动分类 · 以原作者文档为准

Cceilf6 / frontagentApache-2.0

技能说明

GitHub

name: frontend-design description: Create distinctive, production-grade frontend interfaces with a clear visual direction while respecting project design specification constraints, existing design systems, and minimal-diff engineering boundaries. Use when building or restyling pages, landing screens, dashboards, marketing surfaces, or other frontend UI where visual quality materially affects the result. license: See LICENSE.txt triggers: keywords: - "landing page" - "hero section" - "dashboard" - "marketing site" - "polish ui" - "restyle" - "beautify" - "redesign" - "美化" - "重设计" - "视觉升级" - "设计感" negative: - "code review" - "quality audit" - "bugfix" - "debug"

Frontend Design

Use this skill to produce frontend work that feels intentionally designed rather than generic. The goal is not maximalism by default. The goal is a clear visual point of view that matches the product context and still ships as maintainable code.

Trigger

  • New frontend surfaces where look and feel matter:
    • landing pages
    • dashboards
    • product pages
    • hero sections
    • marketing sites
    • polished application views
  • Requests to beautify, restyle, refine, or modernize an existing UI
  • Cases where the code must be working and production-usable, not just a mockup

Do Not Use

  • Pure bug fixes, refactors, or backend tasks
  • Review or audit requests
  • Small code changes where the user did not ask for visual improvement
  • Existing design-system work where the user only wants strict conformance and no meaningful visual interpretation

Workflow

  1. If the request is visually underspecified, ask only the next 1-3 questions needed to clarify audience, tone, and acceptance criteria. Use requirement-interviewer when the ambiguity is material.
  2. Read references/design-direction.md to choose one clear visual direction before coding.
  3. Read references/aesthetics-guidelines.md for typography, color, motion, composition, and background treatment.
  4. Read references/integration-guardrails.md before modifying an existing codebase, design system, or shared component surface.
  5. For a new page or major redesign, use assets/templates/visual-brief.md to form a short visual brief before implementation.
  6. Implement working code that matches the chosen direction and stays within project constraints.
  7. Read references/delivery-checks.md before handing off.

Output Contract

  • State the chosen visual direction in one short sentence when it meaningfully affects implementation.
  • Produce working frontend code, not mood-board prose.
  • Keep the implementation cohesive:
    • typography should support the direction
    • color should feel intentional
    • motion should be meaningful, not noisy
    • layout should feel composed rather than assembled from defaults
  • When editing an existing product, preserve the established system unless the user explicitly wants a stronger redesign.

Guardrails

  • Project design specification constraints, protected files, project stack rules, and user requirements remain hard boundaries.
  • Respect the existing design system first. Only deviate when the request explicitly calls for redesign or the current surface clearly lacks a defined visual direction.
  • Prefer minimal diffs for scoped tasks. Do not turn a local UI tweak into a whole-app restyle.
  • Do not add new dependencies, font loaders, or animation libraries unless the task clearly justifies them.
  • Avoid generic AI aesthetics:
    • default-looking font stacks for new standalone surfaces
    • timid palettes
    • predictable card grids with no visual idea
    • purple-gradient-on-white defaults
  • Do not optimize for ornament over clarity. If visual flair hurts usability, accessibility, or maintainability, scale it back.
我的收藏