算法艺术创作
algorithmic-art
通过代码和可调参数创作生成艺术与交互式视觉效果。
jpsp-tables-figures【设计与创意】Use when building tables and figures for a Journal of Personality and Social Psychology (JPSP) manuscript in APA 7th edition style — embedded in the text, self-contained, and covering a multi-study package including the internal meta-analysis forest plot. Guides exhibit design; it does not generate data.
独立 GitHub 快照 · 自动分类 · 以原作者文档为准
JPSP exhibits do heavy lifting because the paper spans many studies: readers navigate the package through your tables and figures. JPSP asks authors to embed tables and figures in the manuscript text, and information in tables does not count toward the word limit — so well-built exhibits both communicate and free up words for the (capped) introduction and discussion.
Generate exhibits from the fitted result, not by retyping numbers (the usual source of
body-vs-supplement drift). Full map: execution-with-mcp. JPSP is predominantly experimental social/personality psychology; randomization inference, mediation done right (mediate, not naive controlling-away), power, and family-wise corrections are decisive.
etable (multi-model columns) or did_summary_to_latex straight from the
result_id.plot_from_result / enhanced_event_study_plot / event_study_table —
axis units and the SE/clustering note baked in.See a full fitted-result → exhibit chain in the JF execution walkthrough.
Because the paper spans studies, two integrative exhibits do disproportionate work and reviewers look for them by name:
| Exhibit | What it must show | Reviewer flag if missing |
|---|---|---|
| Cross-study summary table | One row per study: N, design, key effect size, 95% CI | "I cannot see the package converge" |
| Internal meta-analysis forest plot | Per-study effects + pooled random-effects estimate + I² | "Where is the integrative analysis?" |
Illustrative forest-plot row set (invented): S1 d = 0.34 [0.10, 0.58]; S2 d = 0.21 [−0.02, 0.44]; S3 d = 0.40 [0.16, 0.64]; pooled d = 0.31 [0.18, 0.45]. Plotting these together — each CI as a horizontal bar, the diamond as the pooled estimate — lets a reviewer see S2's wide interval is low power, not disconfirmation. A stars-only table hides exactly that.
Treat this skill as an executable review pass, not a prose hint. First lock the construct validity, study sequence, power/robustness plan, and boundary conditions; then judge whether the current manuscript answers the venue's real reader: psychology reviewers who need a theoretical construct, validated measurement, and cumulative-study logic.
claim / evidence / risk / manuscript location rows, so the next agent can edit rather than rediscover the issue.resources/official-source-map.md has been checked for volatile rules and the manuscript has one concrete fix for the largest venue-specific risk.【Per-study exhibits】list (design-appropriate)
【Cross-study summary】effect-size table present? [Y/N]
【Meta-analysis figure】forest plot present? [Y/N]
【APA 7th formatting】tables/figures + notation compliant? [Y/N]
【Embedded + accessible】in-text + colorblind/grayscale-safe? [Y/N]
【Next】jpsp-writing-style
../../resources/external_tools.md — papaja/apaTables, ggplot2, metafor forest plots, SEM path diagrams../../resources/official-source-map.md — embedded-exhibits rule and word-count treatment